Management of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis

Amiodarone is used increasingly in a number of cardiac conditions. Amiodarone is heavily iodinated and can cause thyroid dysfunction. The diagnosis of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis remains difficult and more common causes of thyrotoxicosis need to be considered and excluded. Amiodarone has a significant side effect profile, which includes thyroid dysfunction. Amiodarone is an effective drug and its withdrawal may have significant impact on a patient's already fragile cardiac status. There are three different types of amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) (I, II and mixed). Identification of the different subtypes of AIT allows a rational and appropriate management strategy to be chosen. Type I occurs in patients with underlying thyroid disease, whilst type II is thought to result from a destructive thyroiditis. Differentiation is based on clinical grounds together with investigations, which can include thyroid function test, radioiodine uptake scanning, measurement of interleukin-6 levels and colour flow Doppler sonography. Amiodarone should be discontinued in both types of AIT if the indication for its use is not a life-threatening cardiac condition. The management of type I centres around antithyroid drugs to control thyrotoxicosis and later consideration of more definitive treatment. Type II AIT responds to steroid therapy, although antithyroid drugs may be useful if symptoms are severe. Therapeutic options for refractory cases of AIT include surgery, radioiodine and plasmapheresis.     

Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty combined with revascularization in patients with functional ischemic mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to determine whether mitral valve (MV) annuloplasty benefits patients with moderate/severe (3+/4+) functional ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation is a strong predictor of poor outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy; whether correcting it at the time of CABG improves outcomes is less certain. METHODS: From 1991 to 2003, 390 patients with 3+/4+ ischemic MR had CABG with (n = 290) or without (n = 100) MV annuloplasty. Groups were propensity-matched using demographics, extent of coronary disease, regional wall motion, and quantitative electrocardiography. Survival, echocardiographic severity of MR, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class were compared. RESULTS: One-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 88%, 75%, and 47% after CABG alone and 92%, 74%, and 39% after CABG + MV annuloplasty (p = 0.6). Mortality was increased in patients with severe lateral wall motion abnormalities (p = 0.05), ST-segment elevation in lateral leads (p < 0.004), and higher QRS voltage sum (p < 0.0001). Patients undergoing CABG alone were more likely to have 3+/4+ postoperative MR than those undergoing CABG + MV annuloplasty (48% vs. 12% at 1 year, p < 0.0001). The NYHA functional class substantially improved in both groups (p < 0.001) and remained improved; at 5 years, 23% of patients having CABG + mitral annuloplasty and 25% having CABG alone were in NYHA functional class III/IV. CONCLUSIONS: Although CABG + MV annuloplasty reduces postoperative MR and improves early symptoms compared with CABG alone, it does not improve long-term functional status or survival in patients with severe functional ischemic MR. The MV annuloplasty in this setting, without addressing fundamental ventricular pathology, is insufficient to improve long-term clinical outcomes.     

Improved outcomes after aortic valve surgery for chronic aortic regurgitation with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: Among patients undergoing aortic valve surgery for chronic aortic regurgitation (AR), we sought to: 1) compare survival among those with and without severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVD); 2) identify risk factors for death, including LVD and date of operation; and 3) estimate contemporary risk for cardiomyopathic patients. BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic AR and severe LVD have been considered high risk for aortic valve surgery, with limited prognosis. Transplantation is considered for some. METHODS: From 1972 to 1999, 724 patients underwent surgery for chronic AR; 88 (12%) had severe LVD. They were propensity matched to patients with nonsevere LVD to compare hospital mortality, interaction of operative date with severity of LVD, and late survival. Propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis was performed for all 724 patients to identify risk factors for death. RESULTS: Survival was lower (p = 0.04) among patients with severe LVD than among matched patients with nonsevere LVD (30-day, 1-, 5-, and 25-year survival estimates were 91% vs. 96%, 81% vs. 92%, 68% vs. 81%, and 5% vs. 12%, respectively). However, survival of patients with severe LVD improved dramatically across the study time frame (p = 0.0004): hospital mortality decreased from 50% in 1975 to 0% after 1985, and time-related survival in patients with severe LVD operated on since 1985 became equivalent to that of matched patients with nonsevere LVD (p = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Neutralizing risk of severe LVD has improved early and late survival such that aortic valve surgery for chronic AR and cardiomyopathy is no longer a high-risk procedure for which transplantation is the best option.     

A Risk Score to Predict Arrhythmias in Patients with Unexplained Syncope

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a risk score predicting arrhythmias for patients with syncope remaining unexplained after emergency department (ED) noninvasive evaluation. METHODS: One cohort of 175 patients with unexplained syncope (Geneva, Switzerland) was used to develop and cross-validate the risk score; a second cohort of 269 similar patients (Pittsburgh, PA) was used to validate the system. Arrhythmias as a cause of syncope were diagnosed by cardiac monitoring or electrophysiologic testing. Data from the patient's history and 12-lead emergency electrocardiography (ECG) were used to identify predictors of arrhythmias. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors for the risk-score system. Risk-score performance was measured by comparing the proportions of patients with arrhythmias at various levels of the score and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The prevalence of arrhythmic syncope was 17% in the derivation cohort and 18% in the validation cohort. Predictors of arrhythmias were abnormal ECG (odds ratio [OR]: 8.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.0 to 22.7), a history of congestive heart failure (OR: 5.3, 95% CI=1.9 to 15.0), and age older than 65 (OR: 5.4, 95% CI=1.1 to 26.0). In the derivation cohort, the risk of arrhythmias ranged from 0% (95% CI=0 to 6) in patients with no risk factors to 6% (95% CI=1 to 15) for patients with one risk factor, 41% (95% CI=26 to 57) for patients with two risk factors, and 60% (95% CI = 32 to 84) for those with three risk factors. In the validation cohort, these proportions varied from 2% (95% CI=0 to 7) with no risk factors to 17% (95% CI=10 to 27) with one risk factor, 35% (95% CI=24 to 46) with two risk factors, and 27% (95% CI=6 to 61) with three risk factors. Areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.88 (95% CI=0.84 to 0.91) for the derivation cohort to 0.84 (95% CI=0.77 to 0.91) after cross-validation within the same cohort and 0.75 (95% CI=0.68 to 0.81) for the external validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, a risk score based on clinical and ECG factors available in the ED identifies patients at risk for arrhythmias.