A comparison between the Regnauld arthroplasty and osteotomies of the first ray for the treatment of hallux valgus

This article is a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of Regnauld arthroplasty to first ray osteotomies for the treatment of hallux valgus. One hundred consecutive cases of Regnauld arthroplasties were compared with 100 consecutive first ray osteotomies. One hundred fourty-one patients were available for follow-up, and based on clinical/radiographic examinations, 72 were treated with the osteotomy protocol (group A) and 69 with Regnauld arthroplasty (group B). Age at surgery, clinical symptoms, and preoperative radiologic findings were similar for the 2 groups; there was a preponderance of female patients (90%). The average follow-up was 49 months in group A and 51 months in group B. Clinical evaluation showed in the osteotomy group a more stable correction (79% v 49%), greater pain reduction (measured in a visual analog scale from 0 = pain free to 10 = deep intolerable pain), increased residual articular excursion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (27 degrees of active dorsiflexion from neutral position v 8 degrees ), and less presence of central metatarsalgia (15% v 34%) (P <.05). The radiographic evaluation expressed more stable correction values in group A for the following parameters: joint preservation, sesamoid position, intermetatarsal angle (7 degrees v 12 degrees ), abduction angle of the hallux (14 degrees v 20 degrees ), and proximal articular set angle (8 degrees v 18 degrees ) (P <.05).     

Ambulatory Phlebectomy Versus Compression Sclerotherapy: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Although no randomized controlled trial has assessed the effects of either compression sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomy, both techniques are used to treat varicose veins worldwide. We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare recurrence rates of varicose veins and complications after compression sclerotherapy and ambulatory phlebectomy. METHODS: From September 1996 to October 1998, we randomly allocated 49 legs to compression sclerotherapy and 49 legs to ambulatory phlebectomy. Our primary outcome parameters were as follows: recurrence rates at 1 and 2 years and complications related to therapy. Eighty-two patients were included, of whom 16 were included with both of their legs. The number of treated legs was therefore 98, but two patients were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: One year recurrence amounted to 1 out of 48 for phlebectomy and 12 out of 48 for compression sclerotherapy (P<0.001); at 2 years, six additional recurrences were found, but then solely for compression sclerotherapy (P<0.001). Significant differences in complications occurring more in phlebectomy than in compression sclerotherapy therapy were blisters, teleangiectatic matting, scar formation, and bruising from bandaging. CONCLUSION: Our results show that ambulatory phlebectomy is an effective therapy for varicose veins of the leg. Recurrence rates are significantly lower than for compression sclerotherapy therapy. If varicose veins persist 4 weeks after compression sclerotherapy, it can be argued that to reduce the risk of future recurrence ambulatory phlebectomy should be considered as the better treatment option.     

Venous Lake of the Lip Treated With a Sclerosing Agent: Report of Two Cases

BACKGROUND: A venous lake is a venous ectasia that appears mostly on the lower lip and other sun-exposed areas of an older person. Treatment of lip venous lake includes surgical excision, laser therapy, infrared coagulation, and cryotherapy. Although the use of sclerotherapy on varicose veins, leg telangiectasia, hemorrhoids, and hemangiomas is well established, the use of sclerotherapy for lip venous lake has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: We present two cases of lip venous lake treated with intralesional injection of 1% polidocanol. METHOD: Two cases are reported, and literature is reviewed. RESULT: The lesions virtually disappeared, leaving an inconspicuous scar, with two sessions of sclerotherapy. Side effects were not observed. CONCLUSION: Sclerotherapy with polidocanol is effective in the treatment of lip venous lake and offers an alternative to conventional methods.     

Factors Affecting Emergency Department Opioid Administration to Severely Injured Patients

OBJECTIVES: Studies of emergency department (ED) pain management in patients with trauma have been mostly restricted to patients with fractures, yet the potential for undertreatment of more severely injured patients is great. The authors sought to identify factors associated with failure to receive ED opioid administration in patients with acute trauma who subsequently required hospitalization. METHODS: At an urban Level 1 trauma center and teaching hospital, a retrospective cohort study of trauma team activation patients requiring hospitalization between January 1 and December 31, 1999, was conducted. The authors excluded patients receiving opioids only within ten minutes of chest tube insertion or fracture manipulation. The main outcome measure was ED opioid administration. RESULTS: A total of 540 charts of hospitalized first-tier trauma team activation patients were reviewed. A total of 258 (47.8%) received intravenous opioid analgesia within three hours of ED arrival. The median time to receiving the first dose of opioids was 95 minutes. Patients were independently less likely to receive opioids if they were younger or older, were intubated, had a lower Revised Trauma Score, or did not require fracture manipulation. Patients with these factors were less likely to receive opioids independent of the amount of time they spent in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Many trauma activation patients requiring hospitalization do not receive opioid analgesia in the ED. Patients at particular risk for oligoanalgesia include those who are younger or older and those who are more seriously injured, as defined by a lower Revised Trauma Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, and intubation.     

Psoriasis: To Cut or Not to Cut, What Say You?

BACKGROUND: A common problem facing patients suffering from psoriasis is the need for surgery that requires incision through active psoriatic skin. Many patients have been denied surgery because of the fear of an increased risk of infection, decreased wound healing ability, and worsening of the psoriatic lesions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the practices and beliefs of dermatologists and surgeons (orthopedic and plastic surgeons) faced with the decision of whether to operate through active psoriatic skin. METHODS: Dermatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and plastic surgeons selected from various professional membership lists from five representative cities were sent a survey to ascertain their opinions on operating on active psoriatic skin. Psoriatic patients were also given forms asking about the severity of their psoriasis and whether they had ever been denied surgery. RESULTS: Dermatologists are more likely to condone surgery in active psoriatic skin and to believe that there is not a risk of increased infection or decreased wound healing than are orthopedic surgeons and plastic surgeons. These findings are statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: With proper preoperative measures and dermatologic treatment, surgery can be performed on active psoriatic skin in most cases with minimal reservations, although a controlled, prospective study is necessary to arrive at a definitive conclusion.