Pars plana vitrectomy for ocular complications of Beh?et's disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery for the ocular complications of Behcet's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 20 eyes of 15 patients with Beh?et's disease (9 men, 6 women; mean age at surgery, 31.0 +/- 1.8 years; range, 21-44 years) who had undergone vitreoretinal surgery for Behcet's disease at Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Samsun, Turkey, between January 2000 and September 2003. Postoperative visual acuity outcome, course of uveitis, and complications were evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: Indications for surgery were vitreous opacities in 10 eyes (50%), cystoid macular edema in 5 eyes (25%), epiretinal membrane in 3 eyes (15%), and vitreous hemorrhage in 2 eyes (10%). At the last postoperative follow-up, visual acuity had increased 2 Snellen lines or more in 10 (50%) of 20 eyes. Cystoid macular edema completely improved in 3 (60%) of 5 eyes after vitrectomy. Uveitis attacks significantly decreased during follow-up (P = .015). Immunosuppressive treatment was stopped in 11 (73%) of 15 patients. Retinal detachment and phthisis were not observed in any eye. CONCLUSION: Vitreoretinal surgery may be useful in the treatment of posterior segment complications of Behcet's disease.     

Metal fume fever presenting as aseptic meningitis with pericarditis, pleuritis and pneumonitis

BACKGROUND: Metal fume fever (MFF) is a well-known complication of zinc oxide fume inhalation. Prompt recognition of this condition is essential for the proper medical management of this self-limited disease. AIM: To present a unique and unusual case of MFF. RESULTS: Our patient is a 25-year-old male welder who had MFF and presented with aseptic meningitis with pericarditis, pleuritis and pneumonitis. To our knowledge, this is the first case of MMF presenting with these signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: MFF can present with a systemic inflammatory response causing a multi-organ serositis. Our case highlights the utmost importance of obtaining an occupational history on all our patients, even if they are critically ill.     

Combined diagnostic approach of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of female infertility: results of 612 patients

AIM: To clarify the role of a combined diagnostic approach using laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of female infertility in developing countries. METHODS: In a prospective study, 612 consecutive infertile women underwent complete fertility evaluation at a tertiary university infertility clinic: 300 complained of primary infertility, 221 of secondary infertility, and 91 were requesting reversal of a previous tubal ligation. All the patients were examined by simultaneous combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy as a part of their routine infertility evaluation. Focused hysteroscopic evaluation of the region of utero-tubal junction was attempted. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was successful in 608 and hysteroscopy in 597 patients. The most frequent pathologies detected hysteroscopically in the infertile group were adhesive in nature and believed to be post-traumatic and/or post-phlogistic. The number of intrauterine abnormalities found by hysteroscopy was significantly greater than by hysterosalpingography. The rate of diagnosis of significant lesions by laparoscopy of 64.3% rose to 76.6% when the hysteroscopic findings were included. A significant number of women with secondary infertility had abnormal hysteroscopic findings when compared to either women with primary infertility or those requesting sterilization reversal. Hysteroscopic evaluation of the region of utero-tubal junction revealed significant lesions believed to have caused infertility in comparison with those requesting sterilization reversal. CONCLUSION: The combined diagnostic approach of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy is recommended in the evaluation of female infertility in communities where the risk of pelvic infections is great.     

Meta-analysis of recombinant versus urinary-derived FSH: an update

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to analyse the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing recombinant FSH and urinary-derived FSH gonadotrophins [hMG, urinary purified FSH (FSH-P) and highly purified FSH (FSH-HP)] in an IVF/ICSI programme. METHODS: All published truly RCTs using a long protocol of GnRH agonists for down-regulation, were reviewed. Data of pregnancy rate per started cycle were extracted, and odds ratios (OR) calculated using a fixed effect model. Subgroup analysis was carried out to compare recombinant FSH (rFSH) with each product (hMG alone, FSH-P alone and FSH-HP alone). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the pregnancy rate per started cycle between rFSH and urinary-derived FSH gonadotrophins (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.94-1.22). Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the pregnancy rate per started cycle between rFSH versus hMG (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.63-1.05), rFSH versus FSH-P (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.98-1.58) and rFSH versus FSH-HP (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.94-1.40). There was no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect across the trials. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of clinical superiority in clinical pregnancy rate for rFSH over different urinary-derived FSH gonadotrophins. Additional factors should be considered when choosing a gonadotrophin regimen, including the cost, patient acceptability, safety and drug availability.     

The outcome of in vitro fertilization in advanced endometriosis with previous surgery: a case-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in patients with advanced pelvic endometriosis and previous surgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A case controlled study was performed. RESULTS: Patients with the diagnosis of stage IV endometriosis with previous surgical treatment were treated by IVF (group A = 85). An age-matched group of patients (group B = 177) with tubal factor infertility were treated with the same protocol of IVF. In group A, cycle cancellation because of poor response occurred in 29.7% compared with 1.1% in the control group (relative risk 26.03, 95% CI 6.02-112.45). There were 13 (15.3%) clinical pregnancies per stimulated cycle in group A compared with 93 (52.5%) clinical pregnancies in the control group, P <.0001 (odds ratio 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.55). CONCLUSION: The outcome of IVF in stage IV endometriosis with previous surgery was significantly lower compared with an age-matched group of tubal factor infertility.     

A prospective comparative study on IVF outcomes with either purified FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin in downregulated normogonadotrophic women

OBJECTIVE: In compare the use of purified follicle-stimulating hormone with that of a preparation containing follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in infertile females undergoing IVF. DESIGN: Open-labelled prospective controlled single-center study. SETTING: Nile Badrawy IVF unit. PARTICIPANTS: 153 infertile females undergoing their first cycle of IVF divided into 2 groups. Interventions: Ovarian stimulation was done with either highly purified FSH for group 1 (n = 75) or human menopausal gonadotrophin group 2 (n = 78) after pituitary desensitization commenced in the midluteal phase of the preceding cycle. Monitoring was performed by ultrasound transvaginal oocyte retrieval followed by IVF and transfer of three embryos. OUTCOMES: Number of oocytes >18 mm at day of hCG, fertilization rate, embryo transfer rate, clinical pregnancy rate and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. RESULTS: The response to ovarian hyperstimulation was similar in both groups. The number of follicles >18 mm achieved at day of hCG was 12.3 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SEM) following stimulation with 38.3 +/- 0.9 ampoules of Fostimon The Menogon-treated group needed 39.1 +/- 0.8 ampoules to produce 11.6 +/- 0.7 follicles. Fertilization rate (2PN/cell) was 58.6 vs. 64.2% in the Fostimon and Menogon group, respectively (p > 0.05). The number of embryos transferred per woman was 3.1 +/- 0.1 in the Fostimon group and 3.6 +/- 0.1 in the Menogon group. The pregnancy rate per woman was 33.3 vs. 25.6% in the Fostimon- and Menogon-treated groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Miscarriage rate was 16 vs 20%, respectively. However, the incidence of multiple pregnancies was significantly higher in the Fostimon-treated group (32%) vs. 10% only in the Menogon-treated group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Purified FSH yields similar clinical outcome to hMG in terms of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancies in a standard IVF regimen.     

GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review

BACKGROUND: In the present systematic review, we wished to compare the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted conception. METHODS: Five randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In four studies, the multiple low-dose (0.25 mg) antagonist regimen was applied and, in one study, the single high-dose (3 mg) antagonist regimen was investigated. In all trials, reference treatment included a long protocol of GnRH agonist (buserelin, leuprorelin or triptorelin) starting in the mid-luteal phase of the preceding cycle. RESULTS: In comparison with the long protocol of GnRH agonist, the overall odds ratio for the prevention of premature LH surges was 1.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-4.16], which was not statistically significant. There were significantly fewer clinical pregnancies in those treated with GnRH antagonists (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99). There was no statistically significant reduction in incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome between the two regimens (relative risk 0.51; OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.22-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol is a short and simple protocol with good clinical outcome, but the lower pregnancy rate compared with the GnRH agonist long protocol and the non-significant difference between both protocols regarding prevention of premature LH surge and prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome necessitates counselling subfertile couples before recommending change from GnRH agonist to antagonist. The clinical outcome may be further improved by developing more flexible antagonist regimens, taking into account individual patient characteristics.