Giant-cell tumour in the cervical spine: a case report

A forty-six-year-old man presented with a two-month history of increasing neck pain of insidious onset. He received treatment from his familty doctor and chiropractor consisting of analgesics and manipulation respectively, both of which did not offer relief. The patient presented to University Hospital where plain radiographs and CT showed a pathological fracture of the C4 vertebral body. A neoplasm was suspected and surgical excision revealed a giant-cell tumour of bone. This type of neoplasm is rare in the spine and difficult to manage in this site. This case highlights some of the problems encountered in the treatment of giant-cell tumour of the spine.     

Percutaneous coronary intervention of or through saphenous vein grafts or internal mammary arteries: the impact of stents, adjunctive pharmacology, and multicomponent distal protection.

We hypothesized that the use of stents and aggressive adjunctive pharmacotherapies has been associated with lower rates of complicating myocardial infarction (MI) and improved long-term outcomes compared to either previous balloon-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or atheroablative intervention for lesions of or through saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) and/or internal mammary arteries (IMAs). PCI of SVG has been complicated by relatively high rates of procedural MI and less favorable long-term outcomes than native vessel PCI, stimulating the development and application of an array of technologies. This study was based on retrospective review of stent-era (1999-2004) 5-year experience of a single center with 95 SVG procedures in 85 patients and 20 IMA procedures in 20 patients. These cases were compared with the previously published experience of one of the operators during the balloon-only period and literature review of the application of multiple technologies to SVG intervention, as well as consideration of the reoperation alternative. There was one in-hospital death each in the SVG cohort (1%) and in the IMA cohort (5%). There were SIX procedural MIs (6%), defined by total CK > normal, and 19 procedural MIs (20%) based on troponin-I > 1.0. Follow-up has been from 4 months to 5 years (average, 2.5 years), with 91% survival and one late CABG in the IMA group. SVG PCI with stents and adjunctive pharmacotherapies is associated with relatively low rates of procedural MI and favorable long-term outcomes.     

Guardianship: A medicolegal review for clinicians

Guardianship may pose an ethical dilemma for physicians, who must balance protecting vulnerable patients from potential safety concerns with respecting their autonomy. Older adults with dementia are particularly susceptible to loss of independence and the ability to participate in medical decision making. To have the capacity for medical decision making, individuals must understand relevant information, appreciate their circumstances, demonstrate reasoning, and express a consistent choice free from coercion. Although capacity assessments are usually task-specific, geriatricians and other specialists may be asked to comment on capacity more globally. These determinations may be used to support a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian of a Legally Incapacitated Adult, the legal process of pursuing guardianship in probate court. Assigned guardians may be known to the incapacitated individual (e.g., a family member or friend) or may be professional guardians with no prior relationship to the ward. Guardians are encouraged to use substituted decision-making, taking into account the ward's previously expressed values and preferences. Although a number of viable alternatives to guardianship exist, numerous systemic barriers may prevent these from being fully explored. The ongoing need for guardianship should be periodically revisited and reassessed. Data about guardians and wards is shockingly sparse, as there are no centralized databases. Laws and regulations for guardianships vary significantly between states. Physicians can serve as important allies and advocates for patients with cognitive impairment at risk of incapacity, can help preserve their autonomy for as long as possible, and ensure appropriate protections are in place if the patient does lose their decision-making ability.     

The effect of intravenous insulin,apheresis and oral lipid-lowering agents on non-fasting hypertriglyceridemia and associated pancreatitis

Objectives: There is evidence that increasing severity of hypertriglyceridemia increases the risk of acute pancreatitis. There is a debate about superiority of treatment methods and previous works have specifically called for direct comparison between IV insulin and apheresis techniques. Identify patient characteristics predictive of lipid-lowering therapy selection in a large community hospital for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia; evaluate for a concentration-dependent relationship between hypertriglyceridemia severity and risk of acute pancreatitis; assess for differences in clinical outcomes between patients treated with IV insulin versus apheresis.

Methods: Single center, retrospective cohort study including patients with hypertriglyceridemia between January 2007 and December 2016. Main measures included frequency of pancreatitis, choice of lipid-lowering therapy, and clinical comparisons of diet, oral lipid-lowering agents, IV insulin, and apheresis.

Results: Initial serum triglyceride level and disease acuity was higher among patients in insulin and apheresis groups. Neither triglyceride level, Charlson comorbidity index, age, BISAP score, nor initial CRP predicted use of IV insulin versus apheresis. Prevalence of pancreatitis increased with higher triglyceride level, reaching 48% with triglycerides >2000 md/dL (p < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in serum triglycerides at each time interval (p < 0.05) in patients treated with IV insulin and apheresis, but no difference in clearance rate between the two. Length of stay did not differ between IV insulin and apheresis.

Conclusion: The presence of pancreatitis, hyperglycemia, and hypertriglyceridemia severity influenced selection of therapies like IV insulin and apheresis. We found no superiority of either IV insulin or apheresis in the treatment of severe hypertriglyceridemia among patients hospitalized for pancreatitis.