Proceedings of the 2006 annual meeting of the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Study Group.

This article describes the proceedings of the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Study Group (FASDSG), which was held in Baltimore, Maryland on June 24, 2006. The meeting was held in conjunction with the annual meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism and was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The 2005-2006 FASDSG officers, Daniel J. Bonthius (President), Heather Carmichael Olson (Vice-President), and Jennifer Thomas (Secretary-Treasurer), organized the meeting. Nationally prominent speakers delivered plenary lectures on topics of newborn screening, ethics, and neuroscience. Selected members of the FASDSG provided brief scientific data (FASt) reports, describing new research findings. Representatives from national agencies involved in fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) research, treatment, and prevention provided updates regarding priorities, funding, and agency activities. Presentations were also made by the 2006 Student Merit Award recipient and by the 2006 Rosett Award recipient. The meeting served as a forum for clinicians, neuroscientists, psychologists, social scientists, and other professionals to discuss recent advances in FAS research and to identify the most important gaps in the understanding of alcohol-induced teratology.     

颈动脉内膜切除术的恰当应用

在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)首创的头30年里,一直没有明确的标准来确定哪些颈内动脉疾病患者适合这一手术.最近,从7项临床随机试验中得出了哪些有症状与无症状患者适合行CEA的结论.对于颈内动脉狭窄70%以上的患者,卒中的危险性最大,手术的益处也最大.在这些研究中,CEA对以下患者最有益半球短暂性脑缺血发作、颅内外联合病灶和无侧支循环且除此之外身体状况良好的老年患者.下列患者虽然能从手术中获益,但围手术期卒中和死亡的危险性较高广泛白质疏松、对侧颈内动脉闭塞和腔内有血栓者.狭窄50%～69%的患者较少获益,包括女性和仅有一过性单眼盲在内的一些患者行CEA甚至可能有害.腔隙性卒中和一侧颈内动脉接近闭塞的患者有手术指征,但益处不大;狭窄＜50%的患者不能从手术中获益.在最大的一项无症状患者随机试验中,围手术期卒中和死亡的危险性非常小(1.5%),但要在2年内防止1例卒中发生需要相当多的病例(83例)接受CEA治疗.以后的文献报道围手术期危险性较高(2.8%～5.6%).近一半无症状患者的卒中是心源性栓塞和小血管疾病所致.这些局限性抵消了任何潜在的益处.其他试验正在进行,并可能确认哪些无症状患者亚组可从手术中获益.同时,大多数无症状患者内科治疗效果也较好.     

A qualitative investigation of seniors' and caregivers' views on pain assessment and management.

The literature suggests that pain in the elderly, especially among seniors with dementia, is under-assessed and under-treated.This qualitative study solicited the perspectives of seniors, front-line nursing staff, nursing-home administrators, and informal caregivers of seniors with dementia on the current status of pain assessment and management. The views of these participants complement the research findings reported in the literature. While some of their explanations and potential solutions concerning under-treatment of pain in seniors echo views that have been presented in the literature, the participants also pointed to factors and avenues that have been given less formal consideration (e.g., systemic barriers to effective assessment and treatment of pain).They also highlighted the need for pain-control strategies beyond medication. The implications of these findings are discussed.