Nipple-Areolar Complex-Sparing Mastectomy: Feasibility,Patient Selection,and Technique

Background

We assessed the feasibility, patient selection, and technique of nipple-areolar complex (NAC)-sparing mastectomy. This dynamic article includes a video that demonstrates that sentinel node biopsy or axillary dissection can be performed through the mastectomy incisions or through a separate axillary incision.

Methods

The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center initiated a prospective study investigating the feasibility of performing NAC-sparing mastectomy in the setting of prophylaxis and breast cancer treatment. Patients selected were at low risk for skin/NAC necrosis and NAC involvement with tumor.

Results

Preliminary results of 54 breasts that underwent NAC-sparing mastectomy showed a NAC necrosis rate of 7.2%. One patient who underwent NAC-sparing prophylactic mastectomy was found to have ductal carcinoma-in-situ that was not present at the nipple base. At a median follow-up of 15 months, there has been no NAC recurrence, which is similar to other reported series of 0% to 2%. Results were comparable with other small prospective series.

Conclusions

NAC-sparing mastectomy can be performed effectively while maintaining NAC viability. The risk of leaving residual breast tissue or occult tumor with the NAC is probably low if margin assessment is performed at the base or central core of the NAC. Long-term follow-up is forthcoming on these procedures. To achieve optimal cosmetic results with oncologic safety, NAC-sparing mastectomy should only be performed in carefully selected patients.

     

Present-Day Locoregional Control in Patients with T1 or T2 Breast Cancer with 0 and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Nodes After Mastectomy Without Radiotherapy

Background

We sought to determine present-day locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates to better understand the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in women with 0 to 3 positive lymph nodes.

Methods

Clinical and pathologic factors were identified for 1019 patients with pT1 or pT2 tumors and 0 (n = 753), 1 (n = 176), 2 (n = 69), or 3 (n = 21) positive lymph nodes treated with mastectomy without PMRT during 1997 to 2002. Total LRR rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared between subgroups by the log rank test.

Results

After a median follow-up of 7.47 years, the overall 10-year LRR rate was 2.7%. The only independent predictor of LRR was younger age (P = 0.004). Patients ≤40 years old had a 10-year LRR rate of 11.3 vs. 1.5% for older patients (P < 0.0001). The 10-year rate of LRR in patients with 1 to 3 positive nodes was 4.3% (94.4% had systemic therapy), which was not significantly different from the 10-year risk of contralateral breast cancer development (6.5%; P > 0.5). Compared with the 10-year LRR rate among patients with node-negative disease (2.1%), patients with 1 positive node had a similar 10-year LRR risk (3.3%; P > 0.5), and patients with 2 positive nodes had a 10-year LRR risk of 7.9% (P = 0.0003). Patients with T2 tumors with 1 to 3 positive nodes had a 10-year LRR rate of 9.7%.

Conclusions

In patients with T1 and T2 breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive nodes, LRR rates after mastectomy are low, with the exception of patients ≤40 years old. The indications for PMRT in patients treated in the current era should be reexamined.     

Implications of constructed biologic subtype and its relationship to locoregional recurrence following mastectomy

Introduction

We examined the prognostic value of biologic subtype on locoregional recurrence (LRR) after mastectomy in a cohort of low risk women who did not receive adjuvant radiation therapy.

Methods

A total of 819 patients with invasive breast cancer underwent mastectomy from January 2000 through December 2005. No patient received preoperative chemotherapy. Estrogen receptor (ER) receptor, progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status were used to construct the following 4 subtypes: i) ER+ or PR+ and HER2- (HR+/HER2-), ii) ER+ or PR+ and HER2+ (HR+/HER2+), iii) ER- and PR- and HER2+ (HR-/HER2+)and iv) ER- and PR- and HER2- (HR-/HER2-). LRR-free survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between time-to-event outcomes and patient prognostic factors.

Results

At a median follow-up of 58 months, five-year cumulative incidence of LRR for the entire cohort was 2.5%. Subtype specific LRR rates were 1% for HR+/HER2-, 6.5% in HR+/HER2+, 2% for HR-/HER2+ and 10.9% for HR-/HER2- (P < 0.01). In HER-2+ patients (irrespective of ER/PR status), trastuzumab therapy was not associated with LRR-free survival. On multivariate analysis, one to three positive lymph nodes (HR 4.75 (confidence interval (CI) 1.75 to 12.88, P < 0.01), ?? 4 positive lymph nodes (HR23.4 (CI 4.64 to 117.94, P < 0.01), HR+/HER2+ (HR 4.26 (CI 1.05 to 17.33), P = 0.04), and HR-/HER2- phenotype (HR 13.87 (CI 4.96 to 38.80), P < 0.01) were associated with shorter LRR-free survival whereas age > 50 at diagnosis (HR 0.31 (CI 0.12 to 0.80), P = 0.02) was associated with improved LRR-free survival. Among the HR-/HER2- subtypes, five-year LRR incidence was 23.4% in patients with positive lymph nodes compared to 7.8% for lymph node negative patients (P = 0.01), although this association did not reach significance when the analysis was limited to HR-/HER2- women with only one to three positive lymph nodes (15.6% versus 7.8%, P = 0.11).

Conclusions

Constructed subtype is a prognostic factor for LRR after mastectomy among low risk women not receiving adjuvant radiation therapy, although rates of LRR remain low across subtypes. Patients with node positive, HR-/HER2- type tumors were more likely to experience LRR following mastectomy alone. Prospective studies to further investigate the potential benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in these women are warranted.     

The Role for Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients who Present with Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Background

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection has been investigated after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and has shown mixed results. Our objective was to evaluate SLN dissection in node-positive patients and to determine whether postchemotherapy ultrasound could select patients for this technique.

Methods

Between 1994 and 2010, 150 patients with biopsy proven axillary metastasis underwent SLN dissection after chemotherapy and 121 underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed before and after chemotherapy. Statistical analyses included Fisher??s exact test for nodal response and multivariate logistic regression for factors associated with false-negative events.

Results

Median age was 52?years. Median tumor size at presentation was 2?cm. The SLN was identified in 93?% (139/150). In 111 patients in whom a SLN was identified and ALND performed, 15 patients had a false-negative SLN (20.8?%). In the 52 patients with normalized nodes on ultrasound, the false-negative rate decreased to 16.1?%. Multivariate analysis revealed smaller initial tumor size and fewer SLNs removed (<2) were associated with a false-negative SLN. There were 63 (42?%) patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) in the nodes. Of those with normalized nodes on ultrasound, 38 (51?%) of 75 had a pCR. Only 25 (33?%) of 75 with persistent suspicious/malignant-appearing nodes had a pCR (p?=?0.047).

Conclusions

Approximately 42?% of patients have a pCR in the nodes after chemotherapy. Normalized morphology on ultrasound correlates with a higher pCR rate. SLN dissection in these patients is associated with a false-negative rate of 20.8?%. Removing fewer than two SLNs is associated with a higher false-negative rate.     

Histologic changes associated with false‐negative sentinel lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with confirmed lymph node‐positive breast cancer before treatment

BACKGROUND:

A wide range of false‐negative rates has been reported for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether histologic findings in negative SLNs after preoperative chemotherapy are helpful in assessing the accuracy of SLN biopsy in patients with confirmed lymph node‐positive disease before treatment.

METHODS:

Eighty‐six patients with confirmed lymph node‐positive disease at presentation underwent successful SLN biopsy and axillary dissection after preoperative chemotherapy at a single institution between 1994 and 2007. Available hematoxylin and eosin‐stained sections from patients with negative SLNs were reviewed, and associations between histologic findings in the negative SLNs and SLN status (true negative vs false negative) were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Forty‐seven (55%) patients had at least 1 positive SLN, and 39 (45%) patients had negative SLNs. The false‐negative rate was 22%, and the negative predictive value was 67%. The negative SLNs from 17 of 34 patients with available slides had focal areas of fibrosis, some with associated foamy parenchymal histiocytes, fat necrosis, or calcification. These histologic findings occurred in 15 (65%) of 23 patients with true‐negative SLNs and in only 2 (18%) of 11 patients with false‐negative SLNs (P = .03, Fisher exact test, 2‐tailed). The lack of these histologic changes had a sensitivity and specificity for identifying a false‐negative SLN of 82% and 65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Absence of treatment effect in SLNs after chemotherapy in patients with lymph node‐positive disease at initial presentation has good sensitivity but low specificity for identifying a false‐negative SLN. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Reconstruction in the Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient: Results from the National Cancer Database

Purpose

Modern treatments are prolonging life for metastatic breast cancer patients. Reconstruction in these patients is controversial. The purpose of this study was to characterize de novo metastatic breast cancer patients who undergo mastectomy and reconstruction and to report complication and survival rates.

Methods

We queried the National Cancer Database for de novo metastatic breast cancer patients, who underwent systemic therapy and mastectomy with reconstruction (R) or without reconstruction (NR) between 2004 and 2013. Patient-tumor characteristics, mortality, and readmissions were compared. Propensity score matched analysis was performed, and survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

A total of 8554 patients fulfilled study criteria (n?=?980/11.5% R vs. n?=?7574/88.5% NR). There was a significant increase in reconstruction rates by year: 5.2% in 2004, 14.3% in 2013 (p?<?0.0001). Compared with the NR patients, R patients were younger (mean age 49 vs. 58 years, p?<?0.0001), more hormone receptor-positive (76.1% vs. 70.5%, p?=?0.0004), had lower grade disease (p?=?0.0082), and fewer sites of metastases (85.7% had 1 metastasis; 14.3% had?≥?2 R vs. 79% had 1; 21% had?≥?2 NR, p?=?0.0002). R patients received more hormonal and chemotherapy than NR but equally received radiation. Median overall survival of the total cohort was 45 months, and median overall survivals of R and NR groups by matched analysis were 56.7 and 55.3 months respectively (p?=?0.86). Thirty-day mortality (0.2%-R, 0.3%-NR, p?=?0.56) and readmissions (5.9%-R, 5.8%-NR, p?=?0.81) were similar; 90-day mortality also was similar (1.1%-R vs. 1.6%-NR, p?=?0.796).

Conclusions

There is an increasing trend to reconstruct metastatic breast cancer patients with low complication rates, without survival compromise. Impact on quality of life warrants further assessment.

     

Timing of Surgical Intervention for the Intact Primary in Stage IV Breast Cancer Patients

Background Recent studies demonstrate improved progression-free survival (PFS) and improved overall survival (OS) with extirpation of the primary tumor in breast cancer patients who present with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. The subset of patients who would most benefit from surgery remains unclear. This study evaluates the pathological attributes and optimum timing for surgery in patients who present with stage IV breast cancer and an intact primary. Methods Retrospective, single-institution review of all breast cancer patients between 1997 and 2002 presenting with an intact tumor and synchronous metastatic disease. Information collected included: demographics, tumor characteristics, metastatic sites, type/timing of surgery, and radiation/systemic therapy received. Patients initiated treatment within 3 months of their diagnosis. Patients were divided into three groups based on time interval from diagnosis date to surgery date. Disease progression and vital status at last follow-up were evaluated. Analysis of metastatic PFS (defined by progression of systemic disease) benefit in relation to surgical timing was performed. Results Multivariate analysis revealed patients having only one site of metastasis, negative margins, and Caucasian race had improved PFS. Further analysis revealed non-Caucasian patients more often underwent surgical intervention for palliation versus surgery for curative intent, possibly explaining their worse outcome. Patients who underwent surgery in the 3–8.9 month or later period had improved metastatic PFS. Conclusions: Surgical extirpation of the primary tumor in patients with synchronous stage IV disease is associated with improved metastatic PFS when performed more than 3 months after diagnosis. Resection should be planned with the intent of obtaining negative margins.