Revisiting the biofragmentable anastomotic ring: Is it safe in colonic surgery?

INTRODUCTION: The use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring (BAR) has been reported in the literature with good results. Our purpose in this review was to document the clinical outcomes after gastrointestinal anastomoses performed with use of the BAR. METHODS: Data were gathered systematically through chart review with the help of data collection forms from 159 patients who underwent 173 intestinal anastomoses performed with use of the BAR between 1992 and 1999. Of the 165 patients who had anastomoses (6 had 2 anastomoses constructed on separate occasions and were considered separately), 23 (13.9%) had surgery with anastomosis under emergency conditions, and 44 (26.7%) were steroid-dependent patients. The indications for surgery were malignant disease in 63 (38.2%) patients, inflammatory bowel disease in 54 (32.7%) patients, diverticular disease in 13 (7.9%) patients and other conditions in 35 (21.2%) patients. RESULTS: A clinical anastomotic leak developed in the first 2 weeks after surgery in 7 (4.2%) patients, 6 of whom required reoperation. All recovered well, withno deaths related to use of the BAR. Early small-bowel obstruction developed in 13 patients (7.9%), none of whom required reoperation. The average postoperative length of hospital stay was 9.0 days, the average time to pass the first flatus was 3.2 days, and the average time to begin oral fluid intake was 3.3 days. The rate of leakage at the anastomosis in our series was comparable to that found in randomized trials with the BAR (2.0%-4.4%) and as reported with hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses (1.9%-8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that use of the BAR is safe and effective in both elective and emergent surgery. The rate of leakage is comparable to that reported in the literature when a BAR is used.     

Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: current options and future challenges

Current techniques of myocardial protection are evolving with the use of less conventional modalities of cardioplegia and have reduced the morbidity and mortality of cardiac operations. Blood cardioplegic solutions appear superior to cold cardioplegia in terms of myocardial protection and adjuncts as glutamate/aspartate enhancement, antioxidant supplementation, nitric oxide donors and maintenance of calcium homeostasis seem effective. In the near future, further experimental and clinical investigations about pharmacological preconditioning, sodium–hydrogen exchangers inhibition and gene therapy need to be addressed to well define their potential role in the improvement of current techniques of myocardial protection that are suboptimal in high-risk clinical settings.     

Laparoscopy training in United States obstetric and gynecology residency programs.

OBJECTIVES: To assess laparoscopic training curriculums in US Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs. METHODS: A list of E-mail addresses was obtained for the accredited Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs in the US from the CREOG Directory of Obstetric-Gynecologic Residency Programs and Directors. An E-mail survey containing 8 questions regarding laparoscopy training was sent to all residency directors with current E-mail addresses. RESULTS: Seventy-four residency directors responded to the survey for a response rate of 41%. Residency programs from all sections of the US were included in the study. Results of the survey indicate that 69% of residency programs had implemented a formal laparoscopy training program. At least half of the program directors surveyed stated that lack of faculty time and funds were the main barriers to laparoscopic surgery training. Seventy-two percent of those surveyed thought that in the future the health-care industry would demand proof of competency in laparoscopy as standard of care. CONCLUSIONS: Most US Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs have implemented a formal laparoscopy training curriculum, use more than one method to train their residents, and involve almost half of their faculty on average in training residents to perform laparoscopic surgery.     

Assessing postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for severe discomfort after mandibular third molar surgery and to assess the validity of the Postoperative Symptom Severity (PoSSe) scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a 2-year prospective study, a total of 255 unilateral impacted mandibular third molar teeth were surgically removed under local anesthesia by 3 surgeons. Standardized surgical and analgesic protocols were followed. At the review appointment, 1 week after surgery, all patients returned a completed follow-up questionnaire (PoSSe scale) and were evaluated clinically for postoperative pain (number of painkillers taken) and trismus (differences in mouth opening). Sixteen predictive variables were evaluated using stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify the risk factors associated with severe discomfort. RESULTS: Severe postoperative discomfort was predicted by these independent variables: gender, tobacco use, ramus relationship/space available, and antibiotic prophylaxis. Oral contraceptive use and operation time were not identified as risk factors. The patients' perceptions of the severity of symptoms (PoSSe scale score) was strongly correlated with clinical assessment of trismus (r = 0.54) and pain (r = 0.42). CONCLUSION: The PoSSe scale resulted in a valid and responsive measure of the severity of symptoms after surgical extraction of lower third molars and reflected the clinical severity of the postoperative discomfort. From a patient's perspective, operative factors had little bearing on the quality of life after removal of mandibular third molars.     

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with chronic daily headache: relationship with nerve growth factor and glutamate levels

Little has been done to investigate the biochemical basis of chronic daily headache (CDH). Our group has recently demonstrated an increase in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) in CDH patients, supporting the involvement of this growth factor in the abnormal processing of head pain in this pathological condition. Other members of the neurotrophin family, especially brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), have been hypothesized as being involved in the development of chronic head pain in patients affected by CDH, but so far no data are available on this subject. BDNF, NGF and glutamate levels were determined in the CSF of 25 patients affected by CDH with a previous history of migraine. These levels were compared with those of a group of 20 control subjects, for whom the CSF examination and other instrumental investigations excluded diseases of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Significantly higher levels of BDNF, NGF and glutamate were found in CDH patients compared with control subjects (p<0.0001, p<0.0002 and p<0.001, respectively). A significant positive correlation emerged between CSF values of BDNF and those of NGF (r=0.61, p<0.001) and glutamate (r=0.44, p<0.025) in CDH patients. No significant differences were detected in BDNF, NGF and glutamate levels between CDH patients with analgesic overuse and those without. These results support the involvement of BDNF in CDH through the potentiation of glutamatergic transmission involved in the processing of head pain. The significant correlation between BDNF and NGF levels suggests that NGF-mediated up-regulation of BDNF in central sites involved in long-term sensitization plays a key role in persistent head pain in CDH patients. Correspondence to P. Sarchielli     

Newspaper coverage of residential fires: an opportunity for prevention communication.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, fire-related burns are a major cause of unintentional injury, morbidity and mortality, with the majority of deaths occurring in developing countries. In the US, as in other countries, most fatal fires occur in the home. Effective prevention strategies for residential fires are, however, currently underutilized. The news media is one available communication channel to promote such strategies, and analyzing current news coverage is a first step towards incorporating media advocacy into injury prevention efforts related to residential fires. METHODS: Four daily newspapers circulating widely in Maryland were monitored for 1 year. Articles describing residential fires were coded for measures of prominence, content and frame. Analysis focused on measures of issue newsworthiness, reporting of causation and consequences of fires, and inclusion of public health context and conveyance of prevention messages. RESULTS: The data indicate that fires are newsworthy, with 374 relevant news articles in a 1-year period, 32% of which appear on the first page of a section. Coverage generally concerned recent local fire events. Most articles discussed the consequences of fires (88%), and identified a causal factor (58%). Only 36%, however, included prevention information, and less than one-quarter set residential fires in a public health context. CONCLUSION: The newsworthiness of residential fires provides a clear opportunity for widespread communication around injury prevention. Improving media advocacy will entail framing discussion of recent fire events in such a way as to support inclusion of prevention strategies and a public health context in news coverage.