The floating hip injury: which should we fix first?

In floating hip injuries, the priority of the steps in fixation has not been well described. We have treated these patients in accordance with the following protocols. In patients with pelvic ring fractures, the external fixation should be performed first, and in patients with acetabular fractures, the femoral fractures should be internally fixated first. The purpose of the present study was to review our experience with these fracture treatments to evaluate our strategy. For 8 years, 31 patients with femoral fractures associated with ipsilateral fractures: 26 unstable pelvic ring fractures and 7 unstable acetabular fractures were surgically treated at our level 1 trauma center. We reviewed the admission, operation, and follow-up records retrospectively and evaluated the order of the fixation and the complications. Two patients with acetabular fractures failed to follow our protocol outlined at the preoperative planning stage. There were no surgical difficulties other than two patients with the hemipelvis dislocated proximally who required traction of the fixated femur. The complications that were thought to be related to our protocol were one fat embolism syndrome and one pubic fracture displacement. One heterotopic ossification seemed to occur due to using a single approach for both fractures. We believe our protocol to be generally effective, however, in patients with acetabular and vertical shear type pelvic ring fractures, the internal or external fixation of the femur should be performed before the internal fixation of the pelvis.     

Electrophysiological studies of brain plasticity of the motor system

Neurological Sciences - Brain plasticity, intended as the pattern of functional and structural changes in responses to environmental physiological or pathological events, is underlined by several...     

Spinal fluid dynamics during thoracic- and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.

AIM: The intention was to investigate cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) and volume of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drained during and after thoracic- and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. The findings were related to the occurrence of postoperative neurologic deficits. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (12 with thoracic and 17 with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm) were operated without shunting or extracorporeal circulation. For monitoring of CSFP an intrathecal catheter was placed in all patients. The volume of CSF withdrawn intraoperatively, on the day of operation as well as on the 1st and 2nd postoperative day was recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients had no postoperative neurologic sequelae. One patient had postoperative paraplegia while 2 had paraparesis. The three patients with neurologic sequelae had higher CSFP intraoperatively than those without neurologic symptoms (P=0.04). Median CSFP during aortic cross-clamping was 19 mmHg and 10 mmHg and the median volumes of CSF drained on the day of operation 210 and 85 mL in the two groups, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between CSFP and central venous pressure. CONCLUSIONS: A higher intraoperative CSFP was observed in patients with neurologic sequelae following thoracic- and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. Further, there was a tendency of higher volumes of CSF drained in this group of patients. Although, the series is too small to allow firm conclusions, it supports the view that CSFP monitoring and drainage is beneficial during thoracic- and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.