Revision Knee Arthroplasty for Bone Loss: Choosing the Right Degree of Constraint

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of bone deficiency requires varied levels of constraint to restore knee stability. However, the outcomes between different levels remain controversial. Clinical outcomes for 183 AORI Type I knees, 168 Type II knees and 124 Type III knees utilizing posterior stabilized (PS), unlinked constrained (UC) or hinged prostheses were evaluated with standardized clinical assessment tools and radiographic results over an average of 7.4 years. PS yielded superior knee scores in AORI Type I patients (P < 0.05), UC in Type II and III aseptic patients (P < 0.05), and a hinge was preferred in septic Type II or III knees (P < 0.05). Revision TKA conducted with increased constraint appears effective in the setting of increased bone deficiency.     

Lateral Patellar Facet Impingement After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: It Does Exist

The existence of the diagnosis “lateral patellar facet impingement” (LPFI) is controversial and the outcomes for surgical revision for symptomatic LPFI uncertain. We found that of the 3361 index knee revisions performed at our institution from 1995 to 2008, eleven were done for symptomatic LPFI. Their clinical histories and radiographic imaging were reviewed before and after revision TKA and were also compared to a group of control patients. We found no statistically significant differences between the groups in preoperative KS pain and function scores or radiographic features. However, the combined findings of pain in the subpatellar/lateral aspect of the knee post TKA and radiographic lateral facet contact were significantly associated with revision due to LPFI. Surgical revision results were variable, but ~ 2/3 of the patients were satisfied with the operation and had a significant improvement in KS function scores.     

Role of preoperative carbohydrate loading: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Surgical stress in the presence of fasting worsens the catabolic state, causes insulin resistance and may delay recovery. Carbohydrate rich drinks given preoperatively may ameliorate these deleterious effects. A systematic review was undertaken to analyse the effect of preoperative carbohydrate loading on insulin resistance, gastric emptying, gastric acidity, patient wellbeing, immunity and nutrition following surgery.

METHODS

All studies identified through PubMed until September 2011 were included. References were cross-checked to ensure capture of cited pertinent articles.

RESULTS

Overall, 17 randomised controlled trials with a total of 1,445 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. Preoperative carbohydrate drinks significantly improved insulin resistance and indices of patient comfort following surgery, especially hunger, thirst, malaise, anxiety and nausea. No definite conclusions could be made regarding preservation of muscle mass. Following ingestion of carbohydrate drinks, no adverse events such as apparent or proven aspiration during or after surgery were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of oral carbohydrate drinks before surgery is probably safe and may have a positive influence on a wide range of perioperative markers of clinical outcome. Further studies are required to determine its cost effectiveness.