The effect of anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody on allograft rejection

During immune response to an allograft, activated T cells express a number of cell surface activation antigens, among them the membrane receptor for the lymphokine interleukin 2 (IL-2). As the IL-2 receptor is not present on resting T cells, it offers an attractive target for potentially specific immunosuppressive therapy. The rat monoclonal antibody M7/20, which binds to the murine IL-2 receptor, was studied for its effect on allograft survival in two H-2-incompatible strain combinations in inbred mice. Treatment with M7/20 for 10 days markedly prolonged survival of vascularized, heterotopic heart allografts in both strain combinations, with indefinite graft survival in 50% of recipients. The same treatment significantly prolonged skin allograft survival in one of the two combinations. The results support the important role of the IL-2 receptor in the mechanism of graft rejection and confirm its suitability as a target for immunosuppressive therapy in transplantation.     

Late mortality and morbidity in recipients of long-term renal allografts

The experience of the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital with 217 renal allografts functioning for more than 5 years is reviewed. Patient and graft survival were similar after 5 years, with patient survival being 88 and 66% at 10 and 15 years, respectively, and graft survival 85 and 75% at the same time intervals. Actuarial graft survival at 15 years was higher than patient survival because death with a functioning graft was not considered to be graft failure. No differences in patients or graft survival were found between living related and cadaver donor allografts. There were 33 deaths (15.2%), occurring from 5 1/2 to 20 1/2 years post-transplantation. Chronic liver failure and sepsis were the most common causes of death. Thirty-two patients (14.7%) lost their grafts after 5 years, most commonly from chronic rejection. Another 33 patients (15.2%) had evidence of graft dysfunction secondary to chronic rejection, recurrent glomerulonephritis, ureteral obstruction, or renal artery stenosis. Chronic rejection was generally not responsive to alterations in immunosuppressive medication. Complications of varying severity were common affecting 204 (94%) of the patients. The most frequent were hypertension, cataracts, avascular necrosis, malignancy, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia. These data demonstrate that transplant-related mortality and morbidity continue to occur in recipients of long-term renal allografts. These patients require careful and continuing care in medical centers experienced in transplantation.     

Native nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: before or after kidney transplantation?

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? The indications and timing of native nephrectomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is controversial, especially for those undergoing renal transplantation. Post‐transplant unilateral native nephrectomy appears to be the preferred intervention compared to pre‐transplant native nephrectomy. There seems to be substantial additive risk to bilateral over unilateral nephrectomy, especially prior to transplantation. Pre‐transplant native nephrectomy should only be carried out when there are clear indications such as massive size preventing allograft placement, severe pain, early satiety, recurrent bleeding and infections, or suspected malignancy.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse indications, timing and outcomes of native nephrectomy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients listed for kidney transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all ADPKD patients who had a native nephrectomy prior to or following transplantation between January 2003 and December 2009 at a single centre, including those undergoing the sandwich technique (removal of the most severely affected native kidney prior to transplantation, and the other afterwards), was undertaken.

RESULTS

There were 35 individuals in our cohort (M : F = 16 : 19), with a median age of 51.5 years (range 43–65). Twenty patients were in the pre‐transplant nephrectomy group, 12 in the post‐transplant group, and three underwent the sandwich technique. Indications for nephrectomy varied but were most commonly pain/discomfort, space for transplantation, ongoing haematuria, recurrent infections, and gastrointestinal pressure symptoms (early satiety). Seven individuals in the pre‐transplant group and three in the post‐transplant group required critical care admission after nephrectomy. Transient renal graft dysfunction occurred in two post‐transplant bilateral nephrectomy patients. Two patients in the bilateral nephrectomy pre‐transplant group and one in the bilateral nephrectomy post‐transplant group died in the immediate post‐operative period. No complications were noted in the sandwich technique group.

CONCLUSION

Native nephrectomy in ADPKD is a major undertaking associated with significant morbidity especially in the pre‐transplant group. Post‐transplant unilateral nephrectomy appears to be the safest approach with fewest complications.     

Dialysis access failure: A sheep model of rapid stenosis.

PURPOSE: Intimal hyperplasia at the venous anastomosis of dialysis access grafts causes early failure, although increased flow inhibits intimal hyperplasia in arterial grafts and after vessel injury. We designed a sheep model to study this process. METHODS: Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts were placed in the necks of sheep from the carotid artery to the external jugular vein. Grafts were harvested after perfusion fixation at 4, 8, and 12 weeks and submitted for histologic and immunohistochemical examination, including morphometry of neointimal lesions. RESULTS: The venous anastomoses developed thick neointima within the PTFE graft by 4 weeks. Lesions at the venous end were significantly thicker than those at the arterial end by 8 weeks (1.2 +/- 0.1 vs 0.38 +/- 0.05 mm, P <.02) and had greater cross-sectional area at both 4 (0.32 +/- 0.21 vs 3.6 +/- 0.8 mm(2), n = 7, P <.02) and 8 weeks (9.8 +/- 1.9 vs 1.1 +/- 0.7 mm(2), n = 7, P <.02). Only one of the four grafts (25%) in the 12-week group remained patent. Lesions were composed of smooth muscle cells, matrix, and thrombus of various ages. Cellular proliferation was prominent in neointima adjacent to thrombus and in granulation tissue surrounding the graft. Organizing thrombus contributed significantly to luminal narrowing. CONCLUSION: The sheep model of dialysis access reliably produces venous stenosis within 4 weeks. Lesions develop in the absence of uremia, graft puncture, or dialysis, suggesting that these factors are not necessary for graft failure. The continued presence of thrombus and high rates of cellular proliferation suggest ongoing injury is an important cause of lesion formation. This model allows study of the cellular mechanisms of dialysis failure.