Vascular calcification is not associated with increased ambulatory central aortic systolic pressure in prevalent dialysis patients

Vascular calcification (VC) is a novel vascular risk factor strongly associated with mortality in dialysis patients.1,2 Although various explanations exist for this association, one mechanism is through alterations in pulse-wave velocity (PWV). Vascular calcification is associated with increased aortic PWV,3 which in turn is associated with raised central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) and reduced coronary perfusion.4,5 As a result, brachial pressure may significantly under- or over-estimate central pressure.6Not surprisingly therefore, central blood pressure parameters have been shown to predict hard cardiovascular endpoints (including mortality) better than concomitant brachial measurements.7-10 Whether vascular calcification is directly linked to central pressures is, however, unknown since there are many determinants of aortic stiffening other than calcification. Furthermore, a primarily damaged and stiff aorta may be the target for secondary deposition of calcium.11CASP can be calculated using applanation tonometry-derived peripheral pulse waveforms and associated software.12 This avoids the obvious disadvantages of invasive central pressure determination. The major disadvantage of standard techniques, however, is the one-dimensional static measurement that is obtained, with no information on ambulatory values or nocturnal dipping status.Loss of normal nocturnal systolic blood pressure dipping is prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and likely contributes to cardiovascular disease.13 Dipping, which can only be assessed using ambulatory monitoring techniques, correlates better with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in end-stage renal disease than office-based blood pressure measurement.14,15There have been calls for the routine use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in clinical studies of CKD13,16 and indeed, for investigations into the utility of ambulatory CASP in clinical practice.17,18 Combining both ambulatory and central pressure measurements is an attractive strategy, but until recently has not been technically possible.A non-invasive wrist watch-like device, BPro with A-Pulse CASP software (HealthStats, Singapore) was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA: K072593) for the measurement of CASP as well as ambulatory blood pressure. It is a small, wrist watch-like, cuffless monitor which obtains radial pressure waveforms by applanation tonometry. BPro has the ability to measure ambulatory CASP and although not yet commercially available, the manufacturer is able to convert data into ambulatory CASP using the same software.As part of a recently published study on vascular calcification,19 we sought to prospectively evaluate whether the presence of vascular calcification had any relationship with ambulatory CASP in our young CKD-5D cohort using the BPro® radial pulse-wave acquisition device. We also sought to determine the utility of inter-dialytic office brachial and central blood pressure measurements in predicting ambulatory parameters.     

Trematode infections: liver and lung flukes

Food-borne trematodiases are an emerging public health problem in Southeast Asia and Latin America and of growing importance for travel clinics in Europe and North America. The disease is caused by chronic infections with liver, lung, and intestinal flukes. This article focuses on the most important liver and lung flukes that parasitize man, namely Clonorchis sinensis, Fasciola gigantica, Fasciola hepatica, Opisthorchis felineus, Opisthorchis viverrini, and Paragonimus spp. The article describes the epidemiology of major liver and lung fluke infections, including current distribution, burden, life cycle, clinical signs and symptoms, diagnostic approaches, and current tools for prevention, treatment, and control.     

Anti-rheumatic drug-prescribing behaviour of Australasian rheumatologists 1984-1994

The prescribing behaviour of Australian and New Zealand rheumatologists was studied in 1994 using a questionnaire, and the results compared with a similar questionnaire administered in 1984. Perceived differences in efficacy and toxicity for disease-modifying anti- rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and cytotoxics were reported. Over the decade, methotrexate and sulphasalazine have become the most commonly used anti- rheumatic agents, and methotrexate is clearly seen as the most effective drug. Wide variations in monitoring practices for DMARDs were reported, highlighting the need for cost-effectiveness studies on monitoring. There was low usage of functional outcome measurements in assessing patients.      

Relationship between antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and retroviral infections in blood from volunteer donors

Background: The value of the test for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) as a surrogate screening assay in the time before sensitive, virus-specific screening tests were available has been well established. There is significant debate, however about the residual value of anti-HBc screening after the implementation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-, human T-lymphotrophic virus (HTLV)-, and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific assays and, in particular, about its utility as a lifestyle marker to identify persons at risk for retrovirus infections. Study Design and Methods: Screening tests for antibodies to HIV, HTLV, and HBc, as well as confirmatory or supplemental test results for anti-HIV and anti-HTLV, were obtained from approximately 2.8 million donations collected from 1991 through 1993 by five blood centers within the United States. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and relative prevalence of anti-HBc for each retrovirus were calculated and compared among demographic subgroups. Results: The overall relationship between anti-HBc and anti-HIV was similar to that between anti-HBc and anti-HTLV. When calculated from the measured endpoint of the prevalence of anti-HIV-positive and anti- HTLV-positive donations, the sensitivities were 31.1 and 26.2 percent, the positive predictive values were 0.18 and 0.21 percent, and the relative prevalences were 30.1 and 23.8, respectively. Among 27 anti- HIV-seroconverting donors and 9 anti-HTLV-seroconverting donors, the sensitivities were 7.4 percent (95% CI: 0.9–24.3%) and 0 percent (95% CI: 0.0–28.3%), respectively. It was estimated that for each HIV- infected window-period donation detected by anti-HBc, from 19,000 to 81,000 HIV-noninfected donations are discarded. Similarly, more than 33,000 HTLV-noninfected donations are likely to be discarded for each HTLV-infected donation detected by anti-HBc. Conclusion: Although anti- HBc-reactive donations are more likely to be seropositive for a retrovirus than are anti-HBc-nonreactive donations, the low positive predictive value limits the test's effectiveness. If the anti-HBc test is retained in the blood donor setting, efforts should be focused on reducing the number of false-positive results.     

Loss of volunteer blood donors because of unconfirmed enzyme immunoassay screening results. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND: Blood donors who test repeatably reactive on enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and are not confirmed as positive are a continuing problem for blood banks. Units are discarded and donors are deferred, in spite of multiple studies indicating that such donors are very rarely infected with the transmissible agents. Few data are available, however, with which to evaluate whether the discarded units are more likely to come from particular demographic subgroups. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study database of over 2 million allogeneic whole-blood donations collected in the years 1991 through 1993 was utilized. The prevalence of false-positive and indeterminate test results within demographic subgroups was computed for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and human T-lymphotropic virus (anti-HIV, anti-HCV, anti-HTLV, respectively) and hepatitis B surface antigen (false-positive only) as the proportion of donations that were repeatably reactive on EIA but negative or indeterminate on the confirmatory or supplemental test. RESULTS: Several demographic groups with increased prevalence of false- positive and indeterminate anti-HIV results were the same females, younger age groups, blacks, and first-time donors. Likewise, many of the demographic subgroups with increased prevalence of false-positive and indeterminate anti-HCV results were similar: older age groups, non- whites, lower education levels, first-time donors, donors making directed donations, and donors who had received transfusions. For anti- HTLV, by contrast, the oldest group had the highest prevalence of false- positive results but the lowest prevalence of indeterminate results: blacks had the lowest prevalence of false positive results but the highest prevalence of indeterminate results. CONCLUSION: If units that test repeatably reactive on EIA but that are not confirmed as positive are almost always from individuals not infected with the virus in question, then these results indicate that there may be sex-, race-, and/or age-linked proteins cross-reacting with the test kit materials. Elucidation of these antigenic determinates and their subsequent removal should be a priority.