One Size Does Not Fit All: Choosing Practical Cognitive Screening Tools for Your Practice

Every year, millions of patients worldwide undergo cognitive testing. Unfortunately, new barriers to the use of free open access cognitive screening tools have arisen over time, making accessibility of tools unstable. This article is in follow-up to an editorial discussing alternative cognitive screening tools for those who cannot afford the costs of the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (see www.dementiascreen.ca ). The current article outlines an emerging disruptive “free-to-fee” cycle where free open access cognitive screening tools are integrated into clinical practice and guidelines, where fees are then levied for the use of the tools, resulting in clinicians moving on to other tools. This article provides recommendations on means to break this cycle, including the development of tool kits of valid cognitive screening tools that authors have contracted not to charge for (i.e., have agreed to keep free open access). The PRACTICAL.1 Criteria ( PRACTI cing C linician A ccessibility and L ogistical Criteria Version 1 ) are introduced to help clinicians select from validated cognitive screening tools, considering barriers and facilitators, such as whether the cognitive screening tools are easy to score and free of cost. It is suggested that future systematic reviews embed the PRACTICAL.1 criteria, or refined future versions, as part of the standard of review. Methodological issues, the need for open access training to insure proper use of cognitive screening tools, and the need to anticipate growing ethnolinguistic diversity by developing tools that are less sensitive to educational, cultural, and linguistic bias are discussed in this opinion piece. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:2207–2213, 2020.     

Evaluation of the policy of secondary prevention against rheumatic fever among Egyptian children

Objective

We evaluated the effectiveness of long acting penicillin (LAP) as a 2-weekly regimen in winter and a 3-weekly regimen in summer for prevention of streptococcal colonization and also studied the common complaints of patients during the period of compliance for LAP administration. We also attempted to determine the incidence of relapses or recurrence of rheumatic fever (RF) after the onset of first episode of RF.

Patients & methods

210 rheumatic patients with good compliance to LAP (for at least one year) were included in the study. Demographic, clinical information, patients'' complaints and echocardiographic data of rheumatic patients were collected both retrospectively and prospectively. Anti-streptolysin O titre (ASOT) and throat swab culture were done at the end of the study (on Day 14 in the 2-weekly regimen and on Day 21 in the 3-weekly regimen).

Results

The age of onset of rheumatic fever was mostly between 5 and 15 years and the youngest patient was 2 years old. Subclinical carditis (SCC) was present in 79 (37%) of all the patients in the study population. Only 7 patients (3.3%) had a relapse within 2 years of the acute episode of RF. At the end of the study, ASOT was found to be high only in 11 patients (5.2%) and throat swab cultures were found negative in all patients

Conclusion

LAP regimen is fairly effective in eradicating streptococcal colonization. The incidence of relapse of RF within 2 years of the acute episode of RF is relatively low.     

Epidemiology of tuberculosis and HIV coinfections in Singapore, 2000–2014

Cross‐matching of records between Singapore's tuberculosis and HIV registries showed that 3.3% of individuals with tuberculosis (TB) were coinfected with HIV (2000?2014), the TB incidence among individuals with HIV infection was 1.65 per 100 person‐years, and 53% of coinfections were diagnosed within 1 month of each other. The findings supported joint prevention programmes for early diagnosis and treatment.     

Satisfaction with rehabilitation in relation to self‐perceived quality of life and function among patients with stroke – a 12 month follow‐up

Scand J Caring Sci; 2013; 27; 373–379 Satisfaction with rehabilitation in relation to self‐perceived quality of life and function among patients with stroke – a 12 month follow‐up Background and Purpose: Stroke causes complex disability and function, and perceived quality of life has been shown to correlate with satisfaction with care as well as with life in general among stroke patients. The aim of this study was to study the relation of satisfaction with how rehabilitation was provided with self‐perceived quality of life, self‐perceived function and rehabilitation received, 12 months after the incidence. Method: The subjects were assessed 12 months after the onset of stroke. The Barthel index was used to measure function, and the EuroQol‐5D to measure quality of life. To measure satisfaction with how rehabilitation was provided, a questionnaire from the Swedish Stroke Register was used. Results: Two hundred and eighty‐three patients participated in the follow‐up, 137 women and 146 men, aged between 42 and 95 years (mean age 75.2, SD 11.8). For the majority of patients rehabilitation was initiated at in‐hospital care (directly after onset). One hundred and sixty‐eight patients considered that rehabilitation was well provided for. Sixty‐six regarded that the rehabilitation was only partly provided for and 35 that it was not provided for at all. High value on Barthel Index was associated with satisfaction with how rehabilitation was provided for (OR 2.81). Also, rehabilitation on three or more levels was negatively associated with satisfaction with rehabilitation provision (OR 0.24) and so was being male (OR 0.49). Conclusion: In this study, patients with higher values on Barthel Index were more satisfied with how rehabilitation was provided for. However, male patients and patients who received rehabilitation on three or more levels of care were less satisfied. Given the assumption that patients with more severe dysfunction after stroke are being rehabilitated on more levels, this might imply that it is not the amount of rehabilitation that gives satisfaction but the patients self‐perceived function after rehabilitation.