When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of a novel risk stratification tool

Purpose

To externally validate the performance characteristics of the Briganti’s risk stratification tool for baseline staging bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

From 2009 onwards, a consecutive series of patients with PCa were enrolled. All patients were staged to evaluate the presence of bone metastasis (BM) with a conventional total-body Tc 99 m MDP scintigraphy performed regardless of baseline PCa characteristics. The area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used to test the accuracy of the Briganti’s risk stratification tool that recommended staging baseline bone scan for patients with a biopsy Gleason score >7 or with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >10 ng/ml and palpable disease (cT2/T3). The new tool was compared to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline.

Results

A total of 313 patients were consecutively enrolled. Median age was 68 (range 49–95 years), and median PSA was 7 ng/ml (range 0.81–2,670). Twenty (6.4 %) patients presented BMs. Patients with BMs were significantly older, with higher PSA and a higher Gleason score (p = 0.001). The novel Briganti’s model was significantly (p = 0.001) more accurate (AUC: 0.75; CI: 0.632–0.859) than the EAU guideline (AUC: 0.64; CI: 0.52–0.761) for the prediction of BMs.

Conclusions

Our study validated in a group of patients with PCa the novel risk stratification tool proposed by Briganti, which presented a higher accuracy for baseline staging bone scan when compared with the EAU guideline. In our experience, this approach would further reduce (about 60 %) the use of staging baseline bone scan without compromising the ability to detect BMs in patients with PCa.     

Gender differences in clinicopathological features and survival in surgically treated patients with renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the multicenter CORONA database

Purpose

To investigate gender differences in clinicopathological features and to analyze the prognostic impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing surgery.

Methods

A total of 6,234 patients (eleven centers; Europe and USA) treated by radical or partial nephrectomy were included in this retrospective study (median follow-up 59 months; IQR 30–106). Gender differences in clinicopathological parameters were assessed. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied to determine the influence of parameters on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 3,751 patients of the study group were male patients (60.2 %), who were significantly younger at diagnosis and received more frequently NSS than women. Significantly, more often high-grade tumors and simultaneous metastasis were present in men. Whereas tumor size and pTN stages did not differ between genders, clear-cell and chromophobe RCC was diagnosed less frequently, but papillary RCC more often in men. Gender also independently influenced DSS (HR 0.75, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.80, p < 0.001) with a benefit for women. However, inclusion of gender in multivariable models did not significantly gain predictive accuracies (PA) for DSS (0.868–0.870, p = 0.628) and OS (0.775–0.777, p = 0.522). Furthermore, no significantly different DSS and OS rates were found in patients undergoing NSS.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates important gender differences in clinicopathological features and outcome of RCC patients with improved DSS and OS for women compared to men, even if solely patients with clear-cell RCC or M0-stage are taken into evaluation. However, inclusion of gender in multivariable models does not significantly gain PA of multivariable models.     

Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Resectable Liver Metastases: Monocentric Management in a Hepatobiliary Referral Center Improves Survival Outcomes

Background

Management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM) should be individually tailored. This study compares patients managed by hepatobiliary centers from diagnosis with those referred for liver resection (LR).

Methods

Between 1998 and 2010, a total of 284 patients with SCRLM underwent resection; 106 resectable patients (1–3 unilobar metastases, diameter <100 mm, liver-only disease) were divided into two groups: 66 managed from diagnosis (group A) and 40 referred for LR (group B).

Results

Group A contained a greater proportion of multiple metastases (55.0 vs. 34.8 %, P = 0.042). Group B always received colorectal surgery as up-front treatment (vs. 18.2 %, P < 0.0001). In group B, chemotherapy before LR was more common (72.5 vs. 33.3 %, P = 0.0001) and lasted longer (P = 0.010). More patients in group B exhibited disease progression before LR (17.5 vs. 3.0 %, P = 0.025). Group A underwent fewer surgical procedures (80.3 % simultaneous resection vs. 0 %, P < 0.00001), with similar short-term outcomes. After a median follow-up of 42.0 months, group A exhibited higher 5 year disease-free survival (DFS, 64.8 vs. 30.8 %, P = 0.005) and fewer extrahepatic recurrences (21.5 vs. 47.5 %, P = 0.005). The late-referral group (>6 months, n = 24) had shorter median overall survival (OS) and DFS than group A (49.1 and 25.3 months vs. not achieved and not achieved, P < 0.05). The early-referral group exhibited OS and DFS similar to group A. Multivariate analysis confirmed late referral as a negative predictive factor of OS and DFS.

Conclusions

Monocentric management of SCRLM in hepatobiliary centers is associated with shorter preoperative chemotherapy, better disease control, fewer surgical procedures (simultaneous resection), and, compared with late-referred patients, better survival.     

Sonographic assessment of clubfoot

PURPOSE: This study was performed to develop a standardized methodology for the sonographic assessment of clubfoot at birth and at the end of both conservative treatment and surgical correction. METHODS: Forty-two congenital clubfeet and 42 normal feet were examined sonographically in the position of spontaneous alignment and during passive manual correction. Scans along 4 planes provided information relevant to the assessment: sagittal posterior, sagittal anterior, coronal lateral, and transverse. RESULTS: Sagittal posterior sonograms demonstrated the progressive gain of dorsiflexion ability during the different steps of treatment for clubfoot. Sagittal anterior sonograms could not demonstrate the normal alignment of the navicular in clubfeet because of the bone's medial displacement. On transverse sonograms, the talar head and the medially displaced navicular may lie on the same plane, depending on the severity of the deformity. Coronal lateral sonograms provided for estimation of the relationships between the calcaneus and cuboid, which were described by the calcaneal-cuboid angle. CONCLUSIONS: Sonography is a promising technique for assessment and monitoring of clubfoot during treatment. The method described here yields accurate and reproducible information about the anatomy of the nonossified clubfoot, helping the orthopedic team decide on appropriate treatment steps.