Platelets modulate the proteolysis of factor VIII:C protein by plasmin

Factor VIII coagulant protein (VIII:C) functions as a critical cofactor with factor IXa, calcium ions, and phospholipid during the activation of factor X. In the course of this reaction, the activity of VIII:C is first increased and then is destroyed by one or more serine proteases that are part of the coagulation sequence. In this study, we have investigated the influence of platelets on the inactivation of VIII:C by plasmin. Platelets were separated from plasma proteins in the presence of granule release inhibitors and were incubated with plasmin and isolated VIII:C or the complex of purified VIII:C/von Willebrand factor (vWF); VIII:C activity and antigen levels were assessed over time. In the presence of platelets, the isolated VIII:C showed an initial increase in VIII:C activity that was not present when platelets were absent, and the VIII:C/vWF showed an increase in VIII:C activity over that seen when platelets were absent. In addition, platelets stabilized VIII:C activity over a one-hour time course when compared with buffer. The VIII:C antigen did not increase and decreased slowly whether platelets were present or absent. Preincubating the platelets with ristocetin, collagen, or plasmin did not alter the results, and experiments using platelets from a patient with severe von Willebrand's disease also showed a pattern similar to that seen with normal platelets. Experiments using fixed platelets or phospholipid vesicles showed that they did not support the activation reaction or delay the inactivation reaction. These studies demonstrate that platelets modulate the activation and inactivation of VIII:C by plasmin, apparently by a mechanism that is independent of the platelet release reaction.     

Care planning for long‐term conditions – a concept mapping

Objective

This article focuses on approaches within clinical practice that seek to actively involve patients with long‐term conditions (LTCs) and how professionals may understand and implement them. Personalized care planning is one such approach, but its current lack of conceptual clarity might have impeded its widespread implementation to date. A variety of overlapping concepts coexist in the literature, which have the potential to impair both clinical and research agendas. The aim of this article is therefore to explore the meaning of the concept of care planning in relation to other overlapping concepts and how this translates into clinical practice implementation.

Methods

Searches were conducted in the Cochrane database for systematic reviews, CINHAL and MEDLINE. A staged approach to conducting the concept mapping was undertaken, by (i) an examination of the literature on care planning in LTCs; (ii) identification of related terms; (iii) locating reviews of those terms. Retrieved articles were subjected to a content analysis, which formed the basis of our concept maps. (iv) We then appraised these against knowledge and experience of the implementation of care planning in clinical practice.

Results and Conclusions

Thirteen articles were retrieved, in which the core importance of patient‐centredness, shared decision making and self‐management was highlighted. Literature searches on these terms retrieved a further 24 articles. Our concept mapping exercise shows that whilst there are common themes across the concepts, the differences between them reflect the context and intended outcomes within clinical practice. We argue that this clarification exercise will allow for further development of both research and clinical implementation agendas.