Lifetime and baseline alcohol intakes and risk of pancreatic cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study

Recent evidence suggested a weak relationship between alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer (PC) risk. In our study, the association between lifetime and baseline alcohol intakes and the risk of PC was evaluated, including the type of alcoholic beverages and potential interaction with smoking. Within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study, 1,283 incident PC (57% women) were diagnosed from 476,106 cancer‐free participants, followed up for 14 years. Amounts of lifetime and baseline alcohol were estimated through lifestyle and dietary questionnaires, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models with age as primary time variable were used to estimate PC hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI). Alcohol intake was positively associated with PC risk in men. Associations were mainly driven by extreme alcohol levels, with HRs comparing heavy drinkers (>60 g/day) to the reference category (0.1–4.9 g/day) equal to 1.77 (95% CI: 1.06, 2.95) and 1.63 (95% CI: 1.16, 2.29) for lifetime and baseline alcohol, respectively. Baseline alcohol intakes from beer (>40 g/day) and spirits/liquors (>10 g/day) showed HRs equal to 1.58 (95% CI: 1.07, 2.34) and 1.41 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.94), respectively, compared to the reference category (0.1–2.9 g/day). In women, HR estimates did not reach statistically significance. The alcohol and PC risk association was not modified by smoking status. Findings from a large prospective study suggest that baseline and lifetime alcohol intakes were positively associated with PC risk, with more apparent risk estimates for beer and spirits/liquors than wine intake.     

Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials

OBJECTIVE: To compare the feasibility of blinding and the perceived risk of unblinding in trials evaluating pharmacologic (PT) and nonpharmacologic treatments (NPT) of hip or knee osteoarthritis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Two independent reviewers assessed the feasibility of blinding patients, care providers, and outcome assessors, the perceived risk of unblinding, and whether blinding was reported in 110 reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PT and NPT in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Blinding was considered to be possible less often in NPT trials than in PT trials for patients (42 vs. 96%; P <.001), care providers (12 vs. 96%; P <.001), and outcome assessors (34 vs. 98%; P <.001). When blinding was judged feasible, the perceived risk of unblinding was more often considered moderate or important in NPT than PT trials for patients (35 vs. 14%, P=.02) and outcome assessors (44 vs. 10%, P=.0004). When blinding was judged feasible, it was reported less often in NPT reports than in PT reports for patients (46 vs. 98%, P <.001), care providers (43 vs. 83%, P=.03), and outcome assessors (72 vs. 98%, P=.0006). CONCLUSION: Blinding appears to be more difficult to achieve and unblinding may occur more often in NPT than PT trials.     

A 15-year series of gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: a population-based study.

Data from the Registry of Digestive tumours of the Département of Côte d''Or (France) were used to study the characteristics of gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin''s lymphomas in the 1976-90 period. The mean annual age-standardized incidence rate was 0.94 per 100,000 for men, and 0.54 per 100,000 for women. Incidence varied little during the study period. Overall 5-year survival rate was 34.3 +/- 5.6%.     

Impaired mitochondrial pyruvate importation in a patient and a fetus at risk

The patient was the first child of healthy consanguineous parents. She presented at birth with hypotonia, mild facial dysmorphism, periventricular cysts, marked metabolic acidosis, hyperlactacidemia with normal lactate/pyruvate molar ratios, normoglycemia, and normal ammonia. Hyperlactacidemia was severe (5-14 mmol/l) and not corrected with bicarbonate, thiamine (10 mg/d), 2-chloropropionate (100 mg/kg/d) and a ketogenic diet. Pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDHC) activity was normal in lymphocytes and fibroblasts. Functional assays were performed in digitonin-permeabilized fibroblasts to measure oxidation rates from radiolabeled pyruvate and malate. The production of [14C]acetylcarnitine or [14C]citric cycle intermediates derived from [2-14C]pyruvate as well as the release of 14CO(2) from [1-14C]pyruvate was severely impaired, whereas decarboxylation of [U-14C]malate was normal. With increasing concentrations of [1-14C]pyruvate, the patient's fibroblasts behave like control fibroblasts incubated in the presence of alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamate, a specific inhibitor of mitochondrial pyruvate uptake: a progressive increase in 14CO(2) production was observed, likely due to passive diffusion of [1-14C]pyruvate through the mitochondrial membranes. Our results are consistent with a defect of mitochondrial pyruvate transport in the patient. Mutational analysis was precluded as the cDNA sequence of the pyruvate carrier has not been identified as yet in any organism. An affected fetus was recognized in a subsequent dichorionic twin pregnancy using the coupled assay measuring [2-14C]pyruvate oxidation rates on digitonin-permeabilized trophoblasts. After selective feticide, the pregnancy was uncomplicated with delivery at 37w of a healthy female, who is currently 2-month old.     

A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To develop a checklist of items measuring the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing nonpharmacological treatments (NPTs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The Delphi consensus method was used to select and reduce the number of items in the checklist. A total of 154 individuals were invited to participate: epidemiologists and statisticians involved in the field of methodology of RCTs (n = 55), members of the Cochrane Collaboration (n = 41), and clinicians involved in planning NPT clinical trials (n = 58). Participants ranked on a 10-point Likert scale whether an item should be included in the checklist. RESULTS: Fifty-five experts (36%) participated in the survey. They were experienced in systematic reviews (68% were involved in the Cochrane Collaboration) and in planning RCTs (76%). Three rounds of the Delphi method were conducted to achieve consensus. The final checklist contains 10 items and 5 subitems, with items related to the standardization of the intervention, care provider influence, and additional measures to minimize the potential bias from lack of blinding of participants, care providers, and outcome assessors. CONCLUSIONS: This tool can be used to critically appraise the medical literature, design NPT studies, and assess the quality of trial reports included in systematic reviews.