Factors associated with poor outcomes in patients with lupus nephritis

The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with important clinical outcomes in a case-control study of 213 patients with lupus nephritis. Included were 47% Hispanics, 44% African Americans and 9% Caucasians with a mean age of 28 years. Fifty-four (25%) patients reached the primary composite outcome of doubling serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease or death during a mean follow-up of 37 months. Thirty-four percent African Americans, 20% Hispanics and 10% Caucasians reached the primary composite outcome (P < 0.05). Patients reaching the composite outcome had predominantly proliferative lupus nephritis (WHO classes: 30% III, 32% IV, 18% V and 5% II, P < 0.025) with higher activity index score (7 +/- 6 versus 5 +/- 5, P < 0.05), chronicity index (CI) score (4 +/- 3 versus 2 +/- 2 unit, P < 0.025), higher baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) (111 +/- 21 versus 102 +/- 14 mmHg, P < 0.025) and serum creatinine (1.9 +/- 1.3 versus 1.3 +/- 1.0 mg/dL, P < 0.025), but lower baseline hematocrit (29 +/- 6 versus 31 + 5%, P < 0.025) and complement C3 (54 +/- 26 versus 65 + 33 mg/dL, P < 0.025) compared to controls. More patients reaching the composite outcome had nephrotic range proteinuria compared to controls (74% versus 56%, P < 0.025). By multivariate analysis, CI (hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.18 [1.07-1.30] per point), MAP (HR 1.02 [1.00-1.03] per mmHg), and baseline serum creatinine (HR 1.26 [1.04-1.54] per mg/dL) were independently associated with the composite outcome. We concluded that hypertension and elevated serum creatinine at the time of the kidney biopsy as well as a high CI are associated with an increased the risk for chronic renal failure or death in patients with lupus nephritis.     

Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Renal Disease Progression in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (AASER Study)

Background

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for developing cardiovascular events. However, limited evidence is available regarding the use of aspirin in CKD patients to decrease cardiovascular risk and to slow renal disease progression.

Study Design

Prospective, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial.

Setting and Participants

One hundred eleven patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 15–60 ml/min/1.73 m² without previous cardiovascular events.

Intervention

Aspirin treatment (100 mg/day) (n?=?50) or usual therapy (n?=?61). Mean follow-up time was 64.8?±?16.4 months.

Outcomes

The primary endpoint was composed of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome (nonfatal MI, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina pectoris), cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, or nonfatal peripheral arterial disease. Secondary endpoints were fatal and nonfatal coronary events, renal events (defined as doubling of serum creatinine, ≥?50% decrease in eGFR, or renal replacement therapy), and bleeding episodes.

Results

During follow-up, 17 and 5 participants suffered from a primary endpoint in the control and aspirin groups, respectively. Aspirin did not significantly reduce primary composite endpoint (HR, 0.396 (0.146–1.076), p?=?0.069. Eight patients suffered from a fatal or nonfatal coronary event in the control group compared to no patients in the aspirin group. Aspirin significantly reduced the risk of coronary events (log-rank, 5.997; p?=?0.014). Seventeen patients in the control group reached the renal outcome in comparison with 3 patients in the aspirin group. Aspirin treatment decreased renal disease progression in a model adjusted for age, baseline kidney function, and diabetes mellitus (HR, 0.272; 95% CI, 0.077–0.955; p?=?0.043) but did not when adjusted for albuminuria. No differences were found in minor bleeding episodes between groups and no major bleeding was registered.

Limitations

Small sample size and open-label trial.

Conclusions

Long-term treatment with low-dose aspirin did not reduce the composite primary endpoint; however, there were reductions in secondary endpoints with fewer coronary events and renal outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01709994.

     

Phase I trial of interleukin-2 after unmodified HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplantation for children with acute leukemia

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for advanced acute leukemia is associated with a high risk of relapse. It is postulated that interleukin-2 (IL-2) administered after BMT might induce or amplify a graft-versus-leukemia effect and thereby reduce the relapse rate. To identify an IL-2 regimen for testing this hypothesis, a phase I trial of IL-2 (Roche) was performed in children in complete remission (CR) without active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) off immunosuppressive agents after unmodified allogeneic matched-sibling BMT for acute leukemia beyond first remission. Beginning a median of 68 days after BMT, 17 patients received escalating doses of induction IL-2 (0.9, 3.0, or 6.0 x 10(6) IU/m2/d representing levels I, II, and III) for 5 days by continuous intravenous infusion (CIV). After 6 days of rest, they received maintenance IL-2 (0.9 x 10(6) IU/m2/d) for 10 days by CIV infusion. Levels I and II were well-tolerated, but, of 6 patients at level III, 1 developed pulmonary infiltrates, 1 developed hypotension (both resolved), and 1 died of bacterial sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Grade II acute GVHD developed in 1 patient at level I and 1 at level III. The maximum tolerated dose of induction IL-2 was level II. IL-2 induced lymphocytosis, with an increase in CD56+ and CD8+ cells. Ten patients remain in CR at 5+ to 67+ months. Thus, a regimen of IL-2 has been identified that did not induce a high incidence of acute GVHD when administered to children after unmodified allogeneic BMT. Its clinical activity will be assessed in a phase II trial.     

Practice-Based Research Priorities for Palliative Care: Results From a Research-to-Practice Consensus Workshop

We employed the research-to-practice consensus workshop (RTP; workshops held in New York City and Tompkins County, New York, in 2013) model to merge researcher and practitioner views of translational research priorities in palliative care. In the RTP approach, a diverse group of frontline providers generates a research agenda for palliative care in collaboration with researchers. We have presented the major workshop recommendations and contrasted the practice-based research priorities with those of previous consensus efforts. We uncovered notable differences and found that the RTP model can produce unique insights into research priorities. Integrating practitioner-identified needs into research priorities for palliative care can contribute to addressing palliative care more effectively as a public health issue.Over the past 2 decades, palliative care has become established as a promising approach for addressing the needs of individuals with life-threatening illnesses from a holistic, interdisciplinary perspective. For this project, we defined palliative care as an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and families facing the problems encountered in life-threatening illness by preventing and relieving suffering. Core components of palliative care include providing relief from pain and other distressing symptoms, affirming dying as a normal process, integrating psychological and spiritual aspects of care, enhancing the quality of life of patients, and offering support systems to patients and their families to help them live as fully as possible until death occurs.Research suggests that palliative care results in positive patient outcomes, greater patient and family satisfaction, and significant cost savings.1,2 The American Public Health Association, the World Health Organization, and the Institute of Medicine3–6 have identified the development of a robust palliative care delivery system as a key public health issue because of the documented ability of palliative care to deliver effective and efficient patient- and symptom-focused care to a growing population in need.In its 2013 report the American Public Health Association specifically detailed the public health implications of palliative care, acknowledged the growing burden of advanced chronic illness and disease in older adults, and recommended key steps to address the problem. This policy statement called for federal, state, and local efforts to promote effective symptom management in populations with serious illness or at the end of life. Other recommended initiatives included the development of a palliative care workforce, educational programs to improve uptake and use of palliative and hospice care, and research funding to support the expansion of palliative care initiatives. Achieving these goals will require moving beyond traditional medical practices to include both policies and initiatives at the public health level.Despite the potential of palliative care to address the mental and physical health needs of individuals with advanced illness, significant knowledge gaps impede its reach and effectiveness. Reports from scientific bodies and consensus workshops have highlighted weaknesses in the literature and called for more research on palliative care and improved research methods.7–10 Thus, although both interest in and demand for palliative care are increasing, reviews of the knowledge base continue to lament the lack of research on many key issues.11,12Especially urgent is a research agenda that fits most closely with the needs of providers who deliver palliative care. The systematic engagement of community practitioners in a consensus process can lead to particularly useful and actionable recommendations for research,13–15 which are greatly needed at this stage in the development of the field. Therefore, to shed new light on research priorities in palliative care, we used a structured, participatory method designed to solicit practitioner input on research priorities: the research-to-practice consensus workshop (RTP) model.16We employed the RTP approach to identify knowledge gaps and types of studies that should be conducted to improve providers’ ability to deliver palliative care most effectively. This model harnesses practice wisdom by engaging clinicians, agency staff, and other practitioners with researchers in a process of articulating and refining research questions and research priorities that honors scientific expertise and practice wisdom.     

Association of Polyphenols from Oranges and Apples with Specific Intestinal Microorganisms in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

Our group has recently shown the existence of a gut microbial dysbiosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), supporting previous evidence involving intestinal bacteria in the initiation and amplification of autoimmune diseases. While several studies have addressed the use of dietary fibres to modify intestinal microbiota, information about other correlated components, such as polyphenols, is scarce. The aim of this work was to identify dietary components able to influence this altered microbiota in 20 SLE women and 20 age-matched controls. Food intake was recorded by means of a food frequency questionnaire. The intake of fibres was calculated from Marlett tables, and Phenol-Explorer was used for polyphenol consumption. Results showed positive associations between flavone intake and Blautia, flavanones and Lactobacillus, and dihydrochalcones and Bifidobacterium in the SLE group. Regarding the controls, dihydroflavonols were directly associated with Faecalibacterium, whereas flavonol intake was inversely associated with Bifidobacterium. From the food sources of these polyphenols related to microbiota, orange intake was directly associated with Lactobacillus and apple with Bifidobacterium in SLE, whilst red wine was the best contributor to Faecalibacterium variation. The association between common foods and particular microbial genera, reported to be decreased in SLE, could be of great importance for these patients.     

Life Change Events,Ballistocardiography and Coronary Death

Abstract

Thirty-six men and women who experienced a documented myocardial infarction, half of whom ultimately died from their disease and half of whom survived over a six-year period, provided longitudinal recent life changes and ballistocardiographic data. The 18 patients who died from their coronary disease indicated a significant buildup in life changes which peaked approximately one year prior to death; their serial ballistocardiograms indicated a significant buildup in average force of contraction which was seen to peak approximately six months prior to death. The 18 post-infarction patients who survived the six-year follow-up showed neither a buildup in life change nor a buildup in the ballistocardiographic index of cardiac contraction force. These findings of a life change peak preceding ballistocardiographic evidence of an “overworked” heart are discussed in terms of their possible medical and psychophysiological significances.     

Supra and infratentorial massive strokes in previously healthy young patients with SARS-CoV-2. The role of neurosurgery

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has amazed by its distinct forms of presentation and severity.COVID-19 patients can develop large-scale ischemic strokes in previously healthy patients without risk factors, especially in patients who develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS-CoV-2).We hypothesize that ischemic events are usually the result of the combined process of a pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant state plus vascular endothelial dysfunction probably potentiated by hypoxia, hemodynamic instability, and immobilization, as reported in other cases.To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of partial obstruction of a vertebral artery in a patient with COVID-19.Decompressive surgery remains a life-saving maneuver in these patients (as in other non-COVID-19 strokes) and requires further investigation.     

Effect of BH4 on blood phenylalanine and tyrosine variations in patients with phenylketonuria

BackgroundIn patients with phenylketonuria, stability of blood phenylalanine and tyrosine concentrations might influence brain chemistry and therefore patient outcome. This study prospectively investigated the effects of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), as a chaperone of phenylalanine hydroxylase on diurnal and day-to-day variations of blood phenylalanine and tyrosine concentrations.MethodsBlood phenylalanine and tyrosine were measured in dried blood spots (DBS) four times daily for 2 days (fasting, before lunch, before dinner, evening) and once daily (fasting) for 6 days in a randomized cross-over design with a period with BH4 and a period without BH4. The sequence was randomized. Eleven proven BH4 responsive PKU patients participated, 5 of them used protein substitutes during BH4 treatment. Natural protein intake and protein substitute dosing was adjusted during the period without BH4 in order to keep DBS phenylalanine levels within target range. Patients filled out a 3-day food diary during both study periods. Variations of DBS phenylalanine and Tyr were expressed in standard deviations (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV).ResultsBH4 treatment did not significantly influence day-to-day phenylalanine and tyrosine variations nor diurnal phenylalanine variations, but decreased diurnal tyrosine variations (median SD 17.6 μmol/l, median CV 21.3%, p = 0.01) compared to diet only (median SD 34.2 μmol/l, median CV 43.2%). Consequently, during BH4 treatment diurnal phenylalanine/tyrosine ratio variation was smaller, while fasting tyrosine levels tended to be higher.ConclusionBH4 did not impact phenylalanine variation but decreased diurnal tyrosine and phenylalanine/tyrosine ratio variations, possibly explained by less use of protein substitute and increased tyrosine synthesis.