Context Knowledge and understanding of gram-negative sepsis
have grown over the past 20 years, but the ability to treat
severe sepsis successfully has not.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of E5 in the
treatment of patients with severe gram-negative sepsis.
Design A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled
trial conducted at 136 US medical centers from April 1993 to
April 1997, designed with 90% power to detect a 25% relative
risk reduction, incorporating 2 planned interim analyses.
Setting Intensive care units at university medical centers,
Veterans Affairs medical centers, and community hospitals.
Patients Adults aged 18 years or older, with signs and
symptoms consistent with severe sepsis and documented or probable
gram-negative infection.
Intervention Patients were assigned to receive 2 doses
of either E5, a murine monoclonal antibody directed against
endotoxin (n = 550; 2 mg/kg per day by intravenous infusion
24 hours apart) or placebo (n = 552).
Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was mortality
at day 14; secondary end points were mortality at day 28, adverse
event rates, and 14-day and 28-day mortality in the subgroup
without shock at presentation.
Results The trial was stopped after the second interim
analysis. A total of 1090 patients received study medication
and 915 had gram-negative infection confirmed by culture. There
were no statistically significant differences in mortality between
the E5 and placebo groups at either day 14 (29.7% vs 31.1%;
P = .67) or day 28 (38.5% vs 40.3%;
P = .56). Patients presenting
without shock had a slightly lower mortality when treated with
E5 but the difference was not significant (28.9% vs 33.0% for
the E5 and placebo groups, respectively, at day 28;
P = .32).
There was a similar profile of adverse event rates between E5
and placebo.
Conclusions Despite adequate sample size and high enrollment
of patients with confirmed gram-negative sepsis, E5 did not
improve short-term survival. Current study rationale and designs
should be carefully reviewed before further large-scale studies
of patients with sepsis are conducted.
相似文献