Evaluation of a Wastewater-Based Epidemiological Approach to Estimate the Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infections and the Detection of Viral Variants in Disparate Oregon Communities at City and Neighborhood Scales

Background: Positive correlations have been reported between wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations and a community’s burden of infection, disease or both. However, previous studies mostly compared wastewater to clinical case counts or nonrepresentative convenience samples, limiting their quantitative potential.Objectives: This study examined whether wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations could provide better estimations for SARS-CoV-2 community prevalence than reported cases of COVID-19. In addition, this study tested whether wastewater-based epidemiology methods could identify neighborhood-level COVID-19 hotspots and SARS-CoV-2 variants.Methods: Community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was estimated from eight randomized door-to-door nasal swab sampling events in six Oregon communities of disparate size, location, and demography over a 10-month period. Simultaneously, wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations were quantified at each community’s wastewater treatment plant and from 22 Newport, Oregon, neighborhoods. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was sequenced from all positive wastewater and nasal swab samples. Clinically reported case counts were obtained from the Oregon Health Authority.Results: Estimated community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence ranged from 8 to 1,687/10,000 persons. Community wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations ranged from 2.9 to 5.1log10 gene copies per liter. Wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations were more highly correlated (Pearson’s r=0.96; R2=0.91) with community prevalence than were clinically reported cases of COVID-19 (Pearson’s r=0.85; R2=0.73). Monte Carlo simulations indicated that wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations were significantly better than clinically reported cases at estimating prevalence (p<0.05). In addition, wastewater analyses determined neighborhood-level COVID-19 hot spots and identified SARS-CoV-2 variants (B.1 and B.1.399) at the neighborhood and city scales.Discussion: The greater reliability of wastewater SARS-CoV-2 concentrations over clinically reported case counts was likely due to systematic biases that affect reported case counts, including variations in access to testing and underreporting of asymptomatic cases. With these advantages, combined with scalability and low costs, wastewater-based epidemiology can be a key component in public health surveillance of COVID-19 and other communicable infections. https://doi.org/10.1289/{"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"EHP10289","term_id":"372009674","term_text":"EHP10289"}}EHP10289     

Clinician perspectives on clinical decision support systems in lung cancer: Implications for shared decision‐making

BackgroundLung cancer treatment decisions are typically made among clinical experts in a multidisciplinary tumour board (MTB) based on clinical data and guidelines. The rise of artificial intelligence and cultural shifts towards patient autonomy are changing the nature of clinical decision‐making towards personalized treatments. This can be supported by clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) that generate personalized treatment information as a basis for shared decision‐making (SDM). Little is known about lung cancer patients'' treatment decisions and the potential for SDM supported by CDSSs. The aim of this study is to understand to what extent SDM is done in current practice and what clinicians need to improve it.ObjectiveTo explore (1) the extent to which patient preferences are taken into consideration in non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment decisions; (2) clinician perspectives on using CDSSs to support SDM.DesignMixed methods study consisting of a retrospective cohort study on patient deviation from MTB advice and reasons for deviation, qualitative interviews with lung cancer specialists and observations of MTB discussions and patient consultations.Setting and ParticipantsNSCLC patients (N = 257) treated at a single radiotherapy clinic and nine lung cancer specialists from six Dutch clinics.ResultsWe found a 10.9% (n = 28) deviation rate from MTB advice; 50% (n = 14) were due to patient preference, of which 85.7% (n = 12) chose a less intensive treatment than MTB advice. Current MTB recommendations are based on clinician experience, guidelines and patients'' performance status. Most specialists (n = 7) were receptive towards CDSSs but cited barriers, such as lack of trust, lack of validation studies and time. CDSSs were considered valuable during MTB discussions rather than in consultations.ConclusionLung cancer decisions are heavily influenced by clinical guidelines and experience, yet many patients prefer less intensive treatments. CDSSs can support SDM by presenting the harms and benefits of different treatment options rather than giving single treatment advice. External validation of CDSSs should be prioritized.Patient or Public ContributionThis study did not involve patients or the public explicitly; however, the study design was informed by prior interviews with volunteers of a cancer patient advocacy group. The study objectives and data collection were supported by Dutch health care insurer CZ for a project titled ‘My Best Treatment’ that improves patient‐centeredness and the lung cancer patient pathway in the Netherlands.     

Coexistence of primary central nervous system lymphoma and primary breast lymphoma: Clinical presentation,imaging features,and treatment management

The presence of synchronous dual hematological diseases is an uncommon finding. We report an unusual case of coexistence of primary central nervous system lymphoma and primary breast lymphoma without systemic involvement in an immunocompetent patient. To our knowledge a similar case has not yet been reported in the literature. We especially focus on presenting the imaging features, the associated clinical findings and treatment management of each entity, with the aim of raising awareness on these two rare types of lymphomas and the possibility of their coexistence.     

“Marina-Trinkkur” and a few more modern-time hydrotherapeutic myths from the Kvarner region of NW Croatia

Purpose. The present paper tries to address the rise and decay of the sea-water “cult” in regional health tourism in NW Croatia, concentrating upon and analysing more thoroughly the example of Marina, chemicaly processed sea water, an invention of Dr Géza Fodor, the Hungarian physician practicing in that part of Croatia.

Method. The original documents and archived items related to the topic were examined. Furthermore, we investigated numerous comunal bulletins and medical authorities' records of respective time.

Results. Our research showed that the sea-water baths, introduced thanks to the influence of balneologists (like J. Glax), and “drinking cures” (advocated by M.-J. Örtel, for instance) were surprisingly popular not only among tourists of the time, but also among the physicians that used them extensively for therapeutical purposes. These baths and “drinking cures” enriched and completed the medical offer of the resorts regardless of their sometimes dubious effectiveness.

Conclusions. This simple distilled sea-water preparation, advertised as a real panacea, demonstrates a paradigm that elucidates the mentality of physicians, merchants, and patients/consumers of the time.     

The extended brow lift: the toucan technique

Brow ptosis is the main consequence of aging in the upper third of the face. Many methods have been described to correct it: skin excisions of the brow hairline, skin excisions of the forehead natural creases, skin trimmings of the temporal, coronal, or forehead hairline flaps, and endoscopic methods [1,15,17,18,24,26,27]. The authors created a procedure which is based on a forehead-temporal subcutaneous flap and a muscular relocation. It treats the brow ptosis and its surrounding area—temporal ptosis, upper and lower lateral eyelid ptosis, crow's feet—and at the same time improves the sclera show or ectropion. The method preserves the sideburn and the temporal hairline and can reduce the width between the temporal hairline and the lateral end of the eyebrow. The method produces maximum improvement, with high-quality scars and minimal evidence of surgery. The procedure is called "The Toucan Technique," due to the shape of the skin resection which looks like a toucan bird [11,13,14].     

Effect of kidney transplantation on bone mass and body composition in males

BACKGROUND: Bone loss is a frequent and well-known complication in the first months after renal transplantation, but there are no data considering body composition variables (bone, fat, and lean mass) together in transplant recipients. This prospective study investigated total body bone density, fat mass, and lean mass before and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after renal transplantation in male patients who underwent hemodialysis. METHODS: Twenty consecutive renal transplant male patients aged 23-64 years (mean, 40 years; median, 41 years) received one of two immunosuppressive therapies (cyclosporine+methylprednisolone, or cyclosporine+methylprednisolone+azathioprine). The bone, fat, and lean mass of the total body and its related subregions were assessed by means of dual X-ray photon absorptiometry. Mixed factorial analysis of variance for repeated measurements was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: During the 6 months after transplantation, there was a reduction in trabecular bone mass in the spine, ribs, and pelvis total body subregions; the reduction was statistically significant in the last two subregions. There was no statistically significant difference in the lean mass of the total body or its subregions over time, but there was a statistically significant increase in the fat mass of the total body and all of its subregions; the increase in total and trunk fat mass seemed to be greater in the patients not receiving azathioprine. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 6 months after renal transplantation in male patients who underwent hemodialysis, there is a marked increase in fat mass, a significant loss of trabecular bone mass, and no change in cortical bone and lean mass.     

Phonemic fluency in Portuguese-speaking subjects in Brazil: ranking of letters

Phonological verbal fluency studies in English most commonly employ the letters F-A-S as stimuli. We assessed the production of words with these and 14 other letters in Portuguese-speaking healthy subjects (n = 74). The letters F-A-S were ranked among the easiest to produce words in one minute, which is consistent with the findings of studies with English-speaking subjects. There were differences in the overall ranking of letters depending on whether the total word number or the latency between words were considered. Our findings provide a databank of phonological verbal fluency performance using different stimuli in Portuguese, and demonstrate that the ranking of the letters F-A-S is comparable between the English and Portuguese languages in terms of the level of difficulty to produce words, when the task is used in its traditional format.