排序方式: 共有61条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
31.
32.
33.
目的 探讨AO锁定加压接骨板有限切口手术治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折的疗效。 方法 32例胫骨远端粉碎性骨折(AO/AFIF分类 A2型8例,A3型15例,B2型2例,C1型5例,C2型2例),采用有限切口手术复位AO锁定加压接骨板内固定治疗。 结果 28例获得随访,平均15月,骨折均获得愈合。临床愈合时间3 ~ 6个月,无出现骨筋膜综合症,无骨折畸形愈合或接骨板折弯或断裂等并发症。93%患者获得正常活动,关节功能恢复满意。 结论 AO锁定加压接骨板设计合理,固定效果良好,结合有限切口技术对骨折进行内固定符合生物学内固定要求,疗效优良。 相似文献
34.
骶管硬膜外蛛网膜囊肿的临床特点及治疗(附7例报告) 总被引:4,自引:2,他引:4
目的:探讨骶管硬膜外蛛网膜囊肿的临床特点及治疗方法。方法:本组7例,男2例,女5例,年龄28-76岁,平均44.2岁,病变全部位于S1、S2节段。临床特点:腰骶部钝痛,下肢痛与体位改变有关,膀胱功能障碍。X线检查:7例中骶骨骨质侵蚀4例,有腰骶部先天畸形2例,MRI检查:硬膜囊末端均为梭型的囊性肿物。治疗:全部采取手术摘除。结果:7例中6例得到随访5月-5年,平均3.8年,全部病人腰骶部症状缓解。结论:骶管硬膜外蛛网膜囊肿临床上少见,容易误诊,其诊断靠病史、体征及影像学检查,其治疗则采用手术摘除,疗效满意。 相似文献
35.
36.
锁定加压钢板在上肢长管骨干骺端粉碎性骨折中的初步应用 总被引:8,自引:0,他引:8
目的 探讨锁定加压钢板治疗上肢长管骨干骺端粉碎性骨折的效果。方法 自2002年3月至2003年9月,选用锁定加压钢板治疗上肢长管骨干骺端粉碎性骨折35例。按AO骨折分型,其中11C3型7例,21B3型6例,23A3型2例,23C2型12例,23C3型8例。结果术后随访3—20个月,平均8个月。35例伤口均I期愈合,无感染。术后3~4周开始见骨痂生长,骨折临床愈合期为6~10周,骨折愈合率100%。功能评定:肩关节按Constant等标准,肘关节按Mayo标准,腕关节按NYOH标准,优20例,良11例,可3例,差1例,优良率为88%。结论锁定加压钢板具有钉-板角度稳定性强和对骨膜血供损伤小的生物学固定优点,根据骨折情况可以选择加压机制、内支架机制或两种混合的机制固定骨折。 相似文献
37.
Objective To compare the navigational and traditional dynamic hip screw (DHS) fix-ations in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the elderly patients with intertrochanterie fracture who had been treated in our de-partment from April 2005 to April 2007 and whose clinical data were complete. Enrolled in the present study were 25 cases that had received navigational DHS fixation and 31 cases who had received traditional DHS fixation. In navigational group, there were 10 males and 15 females, with an average age of 82. 1 years. They were 14 eases of Evans type Ⅰ and 11 Evans type Ⅱ. In traditional group, there were 12 males and 19 fe-males, with an average age of 82. 8 years. They were 16 cases of Evans type Ⅰ and 15 Evans type Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in incision length, operation time, bleeding volume, X-ray exposure time, bed-ridden time, medical and implant complications, and one-year functional recovery. Results In navigational group, 23 patients were followed for 11 to 20 (average, 14) months and 2 were lost. In traditional group, 30 patients were followed up for 14 to 23 (average, 18) months and 1 died from cardiovascular disease within 1 year. Compared with traditional group, navigational group had a smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time and less X-ray exposure time, a higher rate of fracture healing at 3 months, with statistically significant differences (P <0.05). The Harris hip function scores at postoperative 1 year were of no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) . In navigational group there were 3 medical and 1 implant complications. In traditional group there were 9 medical and 5 implant complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures for the elderly patients, the navigational DHS fixation is superior to traditional DHS fixation due to its ad-vantages of smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time, faster fracture healing and betterfunctional recovery. 相似文献
38.
Objective To compare the navigational and traditional dynamic hip screw (DHS) fix-ations in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the elderly patients with intertrochanterie fracture who had been treated in our de-partment from April 2005 to April 2007 and whose clinical data were complete. Enrolled in the present study were 25 cases that had received navigational DHS fixation and 31 cases who had received traditional DHS fixation. In navigational group, there were 10 males and 15 females, with an average age of 82. 1 years. They were 14 eases of Evans type Ⅰ and 11 Evans type Ⅱ. In traditional group, there were 12 males and 19 fe-males, with an average age of 82. 8 years. They were 16 cases of Evans type Ⅰ and 15 Evans type Ⅱ. The 2 groups were compared in incision length, operation time, bleeding volume, X-ray exposure time, bed-ridden time, medical and implant complications, and one-year functional recovery. Results In navigational group, 23 patients were followed for 11 to 20 (average, 14) months and 2 were lost. In traditional group, 30 patients were followed up for 14 to 23 (average, 18) months and 1 died from cardiovascular disease within 1 year. Compared with traditional group, navigational group had a smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time and less X-ray exposure time, a higher rate of fracture healing at 3 months, with statistically significant differences (P <0.05). The Harris hip function scores at postoperative 1 year were of no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) . In navigational group there were 3 medical and 1 implant complications. In traditional group there were 9 medical and 5 implant complications. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures for the elderly patients, the navigational DHS fixation is superior to traditional DHS fixation due to its ad-vantages of smaller incision, less blood loss, shorter bed-ridden time, faster fracture healing and betterfunctional recovery. 相似文献
39.
40.
神经松解减压术治疗上肢神经损伤 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:1
目的 :报告采用神经松解压术治疗上肢神经损伤的效果。方法 :采用显微外科技术对 6例 48条上肢神经分别行神经外膜松解、外膜加束膜松解及神经前置治疗。结果 :48条神经中疗效优的 18条 ,良 2 4条 ,可 5条 ,差 1条 ,总优良率 87.5 %。结论 :对上肢神经损伤患者 ,应尽早选用神经探查松解减压术 ,可望获得满意效果。 相似文献