The 2005 Italian Quality Control Study for the evaluation of CD4 cells in centers involved in the treatment of HIV type 1 patients

We report the results of an external quality control program, including 17 Italian centers involved in the care of patients infected by HIV, to evaluate CD4 T cell count proficiency and reproducibility. The centers received two commercial stabilized blood preparations, one with "normal" and one with "low" CD4 T cell content. The centers were asked to process the samples two times, 1 week apart, with the same procedure used for samples from HIV patients. Most centers showed a good performance of CD4 frequency and absolute count determinations. In particular, the "low" sample was correctly analyzed by all centers; only two underestimated the "normal" sample CD4 frequency, and only one underestimated the CD4 absolute count by >100 CD4 cells/microl. Overall, our data suggest that most Italian laboratories provide reliable and reproducible results in evaluating CD4 T cells in HIV(+) samples.     

Hebb, pandemonium and catastrophic hypermnesia: the hippocampus as a suppressor of inappropriate associations

The hippocampus has been proposed as a key component of a “behavioural inhibition system”. We explore the implications of this idea for the nature of associative memory — i.e. learning that is distinct from the moulding of response sequences by error correction and reinforcement. It leads to the view that all associative memory depends on purely Hebbian mechanisms. Memories involve acquisition of new goals not the strengthening of new stimulus-response links. Critically, memories will consist of affectively positive and affectively negative associations as well “purely cognitive” information. The hippocampus is seen as a supervisor that is normally “just checking” information about current available goals. When one available goal is pre-eminent there is no hippocampal output and the goal controls the response system. When two or more goals are similarly and highly primed there is conflict. This is detected by the hippocampus which sends output that increases the valence of affectively negative perceptions and so resolves the conflict by suppressing more aversive goals. Such conflict resolution occurs with innate as well as acquired goals and is fundamentally non-memorial. But, in memory paradigms, it can often act to suppress interference on the current trial and, through Hebbian association of the increase in negative affect, decrease the probability of interference on later trials and during consolidation. Both memory-driven and innate behaviour is made hippocampal-dependent by innate and acquired conflicting tendencies and not the class of stimulus presented.     

A 5′ cytosine binding pocket in Puf3p specifies regulation of mitochondrial mRNAs

A single regulatory protein can control the fate of many mRNAs with related functions. The Puf3 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is exemplary, as it binds and regulates more than 100 mRNAs that encode proteins with mitochondrial function. Here we elucidate the structural basis of that specificity. To do so, we explore the crystal structures of Puf3p complexes with 2 cognate RNAs. The key determinant of Puf3p specificity is an unusual interaction between a distinctive pocket of the protein with an RNA base outside the “core” PUF-binding site. That interaction dramatically affects binding affinity in vitro and is required for regulation in vivo. The Puf3p structures, combined with those of Puf4p in the same organism, illuminate the structural basis of natural PUF-RNA networks. Yeast Puf3p binds its own RNAs because they possess a −2C and is excluded from those of Puf4p which contain an additional nucleotide in the core-binding site.     

Striatal dopamine in motor activation and reward-mediated learning: steps towards a unifying model

Summary On the basis of behavioural evidence, dopamine is found to be involved in two higher-level functions of the brain: reward-mediated learning and motor activation. In these functions dopamine appears to mediate synaptic enhancement in the corticostriatal pathway. However, in electrophysiological studies, dopamine is often reported to inhibit corticostriatal transmission. These two effects of dopamine seem incompatible. The existence of separate populations of dopamine receptors, differentially modulating cholinergic and glutamatergic synapses, suggests a possible resolution to this paradox.The synaptic enhancement which occurs in reward-mediated learning may also be involved in dopamine-mediated motor activation. The logical form of reward-mediated learning imposes constraints on which mechanisms can be considered possible. Dopamine D1 receptors may mediate enhancement of corticostriatal synapses. On the other hand, dopamine D2 receptors on cholinergic terminals may mediate indirect, inhibitory effects of dopamine on striatal neurons.