Reduction in oral corticosteroid use with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler improves health-related quality of life in patients with severe persistent asthma.

Severe persistent asthma can have a substantial impact on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQL), both as a result of symptoms and from side effects of treatment. The HRQL impact of two doses (400 and 800 microg twice daily) of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF DPI) was compared with placebo in patients with severe persistent asthma previously maintained on oral steroids as a component of a previously published randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. A 9-month open-label extension (OLE), with all patients treated with MF DPI, followed. Patients 12 years of age or older completed a generic HRQL measure, the Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form-36 (SF-36), and an asthma-specific measure, the Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-M), at baseline, at endpoint (last evaluable visit) of the double-blind phase (EODBP), and after the first 3 months of the OLE. Of 132 patients enrolled in the study, 128 provided HRQL data at baseline and at EODBP. Mean SF-36 scores at baseline showed significant HRQL impairment compared with U.S. general population norms. With treatment, the reduction in oral corticosteroid (OCS) requirements of the MF-DPI-treated groups was accompanied by significant (p < 0.05) improvement over placebo in the physical domain of HRQL (SF-36 physical component summary score and the physical function subscale) at EODBP. MF-DPI-treated patients also showed significant improvements at EODBP in each of the four subscales of the AQLQ-M (p<0.05). From EODBP to the OLE 3-month endpoint, patients treated with MF DPI twice daily maintained, or improved, SF-36 scores in most domains. Symptomatic improvement and reduction in OCS use with MF DPI were accompanied by significant improvement in HRQL in patients with severe persistent asthma. These improvements were maintained during the 3-month period of the OLE in which HRQL was evaluated.     

A survey: conscious sedation with epidural and zygapophyseal injections: is it necessary?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Substantial variation exists regarding the use of sedation before interventional spine techniques. Patient preference should play an important role in decision making regarding the need for sedation. However, little is known about patients' anxiety levels before spinal injections and their perceptions about the necessity of sedation. PURPOSE: To determine patient perception for need for sedation before epidural steroid injections and zygapophyseal joint injections. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Survey of consecutive spinal injection patients in an outpatient spine center. PATIENT SAMPLE: 500 consecutive lumbar, thoracic, and cervical patients receiving spinal injections. OUTCOME MEASURES: A 12-item questionnaire assessing patients' perceived anxiety before to a spinal injection. METHODS: Subjects were given the questionnaire after their spinal injection. Percentages requesting sedation for a first and potential second procedure were assessed. Additionally, anxiety level and pain rating, location of injection, age, sex, and other medication use were analyzed to determine the effect on the request for sedation. RESULTS: 17% of patients questioned requested sedation before an injection, and 28% would request sedation if they were to have a second injection. CONCLUSIONS: Routine sedation before diagnostic and therapeutic injections is not necessary as the majority of patients would not request sedation before the procedure when given the option. However, in some patients sedation is indicated, and all patients would benefit from educational material on sedation before the injection.     

Outcomes at 3 years of a prospective pilot study of Campath-1H and sirolimus immunosuppression for renal transplantation

Campath-1H (alemtuzumab) induction was used for renal transplantation in combination with sirolimus as immunosuppression. We previously reported a high (28%) rate of early rejection with this regimen, and now report 3-year outcomes. Twenty-nine patients were recipients of either deceased donor or non-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) identical living donor primary renal allografts. Clinical parameters including infection, malignancy, kidney function, and kidney histology were followed prospectively for 3 years. Three-year cumulative graft and patient survival were 96% and 100%, respectively. Twenty patients were maintained on steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens, and 15 patients were maintained on monotherapy for immunosuppression (12 on sirolimus). No serious infectious complications were observed and two patients developed basal cell skin cancer. The 3-year results of our initial pilot study demonstrate good graft (96%) and patient (100%) outcomes. Campath-1H induction has yielded a high proportion of patients maintained on immunosuppressive monotherapy (57%) without serious infectious- and no malignancy-related complications. The reported regimen yielded novel insights into both Campath-1H and sirolimus therapy in renal transplantation. Because of the higher incidence of early rejection, we recommend a modified strategy of immunosuppression including a brief course of a calcineurin inhibitor.     

Health insurance and AIDS: the status of state regulatory activity.

Information collected by the National Gay Rights Advocates in 1986 and by the authors in the spring of 1987 was used to determine the extent to which the states currently regulate the practices of the health insurance industry specific to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Of the 10 states reporting the greatest number of AIDS cases, six prohibit insurers form denying coverage to group policy applicants because of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. These findings refer only to the status of state regulatory activity specific to AIDS.