A comparison of double single suture-button fixation,suture-button fixation,and screw fixation for ankle syndesmosis injury: A retrospective cohort study

Different methods have been used throughout the years for syndesmotic injury but there is no consensus on the ideal treatment. Some methods are expensive and some have more complications. The aim of this study is to compare single suture endobutton with double suture endobutton and screw fixation for syndesmotic injury.Sixty nine patients with syndesmotic injury with fibular fractures whom were treated with a single interosseous suture endobutton system (ZipTight^TM, Zimmer Biomet), a double interosseous suture endobutton system (ZipTight^TM, Zimmer Biomet) and 1 syndesmotic screw (TST, Istanbul, Turkey) were included in this study. Functional and radiological results from patient records between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.Twenty patients were treated with the double interosseous suture endobutton, 23 were treated with the single interosseous suture endobutton, and 26 were treated with traditional AO screw fixation. Three patients from the screw fixation group (11.5%) required revision surgery (P < .05). All the radiologic and clinical outcomes were statistical similar in all 3 groups.Our findings showed that the interosseous suture endobutton system is at least as safe as the screw fixation technique for treatment of syndesmosis joint injuries and can be used as an alternative to the screw method. The interosseous suture endobutton system eliminates the need for a second surgery to remove the hardware, which minimizes the probability of re-diastasis. Since our results showed no statistical difference between single and double interosseous suture endobutton systems, the less costly single endobutton system may be the better alternative.     

Ultrasound Examination and Localization of the Sciatic Nerve: A Volunteer Study

Background: Few studies have examined the use of ultrasound for sciatic nerve localization. The authors evaluated the usefulness of low-frequency ultrasound in identifying the sciatic nerve at three locations in the lower extremity and in guiding needle advancement to target before nerve stimulation.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 15 volunteers underwent sciatic nerve examination using a curved ultrasound probe in the range of 2-5 MHz and a Philips-ATL 5000 unit (ATL Ultrasound, Bothell, WA) in the gluteal, infragluteal, and proximal thigh regions. Thereafter, an insulated block needle was advanced inline with the ultrasound beam to reach the nerve target, which was further confirmed by electrical stimulation. The quality of sciatic nerve images, ease of needle to nerve contact, threshold stimulating current, and resultant motor response were recorded.

Results: The sciatic nerve was successfully identified in the transverse view as a solitary predominantly hyperechoic structure on ultrasound in all of the three regions examined. The target nerve was visualized easily in 87% and localized within two needle attempts in all patients. Nerve stimulation was successful in 100% after two attempts with a threshold current of 0.42 +/- 0.12 (mean +/- SD) eliciting foot plantarflexion or dorsiflexion.     

Reinforcement of the suture line with an ePTFE graft attached with histoacryl glue in duodenal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Most duodenal injuries are managed with primary repair, but the degree of duodenal-wall injury may threaten the integrity of the primary repair. Therefore, we evaluated whether the primary repair site could be reinforced with histoacryl glue (HAG) or HAG with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh. METHODS: Grade 3 duodenal injury in the second portion of the rat duodenum was chosen as a standard trauma model. Thirty-three male rats were divided into sham (n = 3), 2-layer primary repair (n = 10), 1-layer primary repair plus HAG application (n = 10) and ePTFE attached with HAG over the 1-layer primary repair site (n = 10) groups. Ten-day survival, adhesion grades and histological assessment were taken as outcome measures. RESULTS: A significant survival advantage was identified in the group that had an ePTFE graft attached with HAG over a 1-layer repair when compared with the group that had a 2-layer primary repair. Adhesion grades were found to be particularly increased in the group that had an ePTFE graft attached with HAG over the primary repair site, moderately increased in the primary repair plus HAG application group and lower in the 2-layer primary repair group. ePTFE graft application was found to be beneficial to coverage of the HAG-dependent empty spaces in the serosal layer. CONCLUSIONS: A primary repair site after duodenal trauma or a difficult duodenal stump can be reinforced with the application of HAG or ePTFE graft implantation with HAG.     

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a regular origin in the muscularis propria, but an extremely diverse gross presentation

Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are thought to arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs). ICCs form a network surrounding the myenteric plexus and between-muscle fibres of the muscularis propria of the tubular GI tract. The cell of origin of so-called extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumours (EGISTs) is not known.Aim and methods To study the diversity of gross presentation of GISTs and to critically assess the incidence of EGISTs and their relationship to mural GISTs, a total of 200 neoplasms with typical morphologic and immunohistochemical features of GISTs were reviewed, looking for any degree of association with the muscularis propria of the gut wall.Results There were 130 gastric (65%), 9 duodenal (4.5%), 48 small intestinal (24%), 9 colorectal (4.5%), 1 appendiceal (0.5%) and 3 unclassifiable GISTs (1.5%). Fourteen cases (7%) were initially submitted as EGISTs (four mesenteric, four omental, one pararectal/prostatic, one pelvic/Douglas, one perivesical, one located between root of mesentery and tail of pancreas, one involving the mesentery, omentum and abdominal wall extensively and one located between liver and stomach). After critical re-evaluation of surgical reports and remote clinical history and a careful search for residual muscular tissue from the gut wall in the tumour pseudocapsule (in some cases supported by desmin immunoreactivity), it was possible to reclassify most of these cases (11/14) as either GISTs with extensive extramural growth resulting in loss of contact to the external muscle coat of the gut (8/14) or as metastases from an inoperable GIST (2/14) or from a previously resected deceptively benign tumour (1/14).Conclusion EGISTs are probably rarer than previously reported (1.5% or less in this study). We concluded that most so-called EGISTs represent apparent EGISTs that should have arisen from the outermost muscle coat, but have lost their contact to the point of origin due to extensive extramural growth pattern. From a surgical point of view, it is crucial to document and mark any focal attachment or adhesions to the gut wall noticed during surgery for an apparent EGIST. In contrast to most other neoplasms, GISTs should be defined by virtue of any degree of association with the muscularis propria (no matter how minimal), but not by localisation of the bulk of the tumour.