Prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes in southern Italy

HCV is ubiquitous. In 50% of all cases it causes chronic hepatitis that often evolves into liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently HCV has been classified in 5 genotypes by Okamoto. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of 5 genotypes in Campania, a region of Southern Italy, where the prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies ranges from 0.87 to 4%, and to evaluate the correlation between the HCV genotypes and the severity of histological damage. One hundred and thirty-five anti-HCV positive patients were enrolled and tested by PCR to identify HCV-RNA. One hundred and twenty-four patients resulted HCV-RNA positive. Genotyping was performed as described by Okamoto et al. with minor modifications of the specific primer to type III proposed by Silini et al. Eight patients were negative for all genotypes. Eight patients were positive for type I(1a), 61 for type II(1b), 39 for type III(2a), 11 for type IV(2b) and 1 for type V(3a). In 4 cases two different genotypes were present in the same sample [II(1b)-IV(2b), III(2a)-II(1b) twice, III(2a)-IV(2b)]. Histological evaluation of liver damage showed: CPH (22 cases), minimal CAH (56), severe CAH (31) and liver cirrhosis (15). There was no statistically significant correlation between the 5 genotypes and the severity of histological damage. Data on the prevalence of genotype II(1b) in Italy are similar to those reported for other European countries. The prevalence of genotypes in Southern Italy is similar to that reported in the population of Northern Italy.     

Basic neuroscience

Poster Session 1

Basic neuroscience     

A placebo-controlled trial of lamotrigine add-on therapy for partial seizures in children. Lamictal Pediatric Partial Seizure Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of add-on lamotrigine and placebo in the treatment of children and adolescents with partial seizures. BACKGROUND: Add-on and monotherapy lamotrigine is safe and effective in adults with partial seizures, and reports of preliminary uncontrolled trials suggest similar benefits in children. METHODS: We studied 201 children with diagnoses of partial seizures of any subtype currently receiving stable conventional regimens of antiepileptic therapy at 40 study sites in the United States and France. After a baseline observation period (to confirm that more than four seizures occurred in each of two consecutive 4-week periods), patients were randomized to add-on lamotrigine or placebo therapy. A 6-week dose-escalation period was followed by a 12-week maintenance period. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, lamotrigine significantly reduced the frequency of all partial seizures and the frequency of secondarily generalized partial seizures in these treatment-resistant patients. The most commonly reported adverse events in the lamotrigine-treated patients were vomiting, somnolence, and infection; the frequency of these and other adverse events was similar to that in the placebo-treated group, with the exception of ataxia, dizziness, tremor, and nausea, which were more frequent in the lamotrigine-treated group. The frequency of withdrawals for adverse events was similar between groups. Two patients were hospitalized for skin rash, which resolved after discontinuation of lamotrigine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine was effective for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in children and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile.     

Is obstructive sleep apnea syndrome a risk factor for auditory pathway?

Purpose  

The transduction mechanism of the inner ear and the transmission of nerve impulses along the auditory way are highly dependent upon the cochlear oxygen supply. Several studies have considered the possibility that obstructive sleep apnea–hypopneas during sleep can interfere with these processes, and the results are not uniform. The aim of the study is to evaluate the auditory function in adult patients affected by severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).     

Prospective study of the meaning of indeterminate results of the Recombinant Immunoblot Assay for hepatitis C virus in blood donors

Background

The interpretation of “indeterminate” results of the recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) is a particularly sensitive issue for Transfusion Services, and donors with such a serological condition require long-term follow-up.

Materials and methods

In the Immunohaematology and Transfusion Medicine Division of Umberto I University Hospital (Rome, Italy), 102,979 donor blood units were screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) over a 5-year period (01.01.2000 – 31.12.2004). Since 24.10.2001, HCV -RNA testing was added. All samples repeatedly reactive by ELISA were then submitted to a HCV confirmatory assay (RIBA).

Results

Among the 102,979 donors we found 271 positive to HCV ELISA testing. The results of the RIBA assay for these donors were negative in 178 (65.7%) cases, positive in 28 (10.3%) and indeterminate in 65 (24.0 %).Of the 65 subjects with an indeterminate pattern, 24 completed a sufficient follow-up (median 25 months; range, 6 – 52), during which some (n=8; 33%) converted to a negative status, some (n=16; 67%) maintained their reactivity pattern, but none became seropositive for HCV.

Conclusions

The HCV-RIBA indeterminate status may indicate either a non-specific reaction (false positive) or a real pre-existing or initial infection and does not, therefore, enable a prediction of outcome. The use of HCV genomic assays (nucleic acid amplification testing), which are more specific than antibody-based assays (ELISA, RIBA), therefore improves HCV blood donor testing by allowing an accurate interpretation of such primary assays.     

Biological therapies for eosinophilic asthma

Introduction: Severe uncontrolled asthma is by definition refractory to traditional therapies or can be controlled only with therapies that have intolerable side effects. Monoclonal antibodies that target interleukin (IL)-5/IL-5Rα, IgE, and IL-4Rα have shown favorable results in clinical trials, including reductions in asthma exacerbations and other important clinical outcomes. These biological agents offer treatment alternatives to patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma.

Areas covered: This article reviews how the shifting emphasis toward identifying distinct asthma phenotypes has led to the approval of biological therapies that preferentially benefit patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. The clinical trials that led to the approval of these biologic treatments are discussed in detail.

Expert opinion: Biologic therapies targeting the IL-5, IgE, IL-4/IL-13 signaling pathways have been successful in clinical trials in subjects with severe eosinophilic asthma. Some of these agents have also been successful regardless of peripheral blood eosinophil counts. These treatments have shown a relatively favorable safety profile in clinical trials, although long-term safety data for some of these agents are limited. Due to the high costs associated with these medications, they should be reserved for select patients where they yield a therapeutic and pharmacoeconomic advantage.