Erythromycin treatment for gastrointestinal dysmotility in preterm infants

To report our clinical experience on the use of oral erythromycin for the treatment of severe gastrointestinal dysmotility in preterm infants.

Methodology:

A case series study of seven preterm infants (six were very low birthweight) with severe intestinal dysmotility in a tertiary neonatal centre.

Results:

All responded favourably without adverse effects and tolerated full enteral feeding within 1–2 weeks of the commencement of the drug.

Conclusions:

As prolonged total parenteral nutrition carries significant risk of complications, this therapy could be considered in selected preterm infants who fail to establish enteral feeding after an extended period, and in whom an anatomically obstructive lesion of the gastrointestinal tract has been excluded. Meanwhile, we would caution against the widespread implementation of this therapeutic approach until formal evaluation by randomized controlled trials have established the exact role of erythromycin, or its analogues, in the treatment of intestinal dysmotility in preterm infants.     

亚太地区炎症性肠病处理共识意见(一)

虽然目前亚太地区尚无炎症性肠病（IBD）的大规模流行病学资料，但一系列研究显示其发病率和患病率呈上升趋势。与西方国家相比仍呈滞后现象。溃疡性结肠炎（UC）的发病率仍较克罗恩病（CD）高。除地域差异外。在一些多民族国家中，IBD尚可见种族差异。亚太地区IBD的遗传背景有异于西方国家。如据报道该地区CD患者未检出NOD2／CARDI5变异。一般而言，该地区IBD患者的临床过程似不如西方国家严重。 亚太地区IBD的诊断存在一些特殊问题。如缺乏IBD诊断金标准。存在多种小肠结肠炎，与IBD临床表现相似，使鉴别诊断特别困难。迄今为止，亚太地区IBD的诊断标准多采用西方国家的诊断标准。诊断必须逐步排除非IBD的小肠结肠炎。确诊应有典型的组织学表现。某些患者需借助随访和诊断性治疗才能确诊。进一步研究IBD发病机制将有助于开发更好的诊断标记物。 亚太地区IBD的治疗亦存在特殊问题。由于诊断困难。IBD患者常未能及时接受适当的药物治疗，但该地区仍广泛采用药物治疗方案。结合西方指南和本地经验可制定类似的处理原则。以利诱导缓解和维持缓解。提倡逐级使用基于病变范围、活动性和严重度的阶梯式治疗方案。对不同病例采用综合性、个体化的方法。随着对IBD发病机制和亚太地区IBD独特性的深入理解。合理、实用的药物治疗指南和应用生物制剂治疗将改善该地区IBD的治疗前景。     

The unmasking of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pneumocystis jiroveci</Emphasis> pneumonia during reversal of immunosuppression: case reports and literature review

Background  

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) is an important opportunistic infection among immunosuppressed patients, especially in those infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The clinical presentation of PCP in immunosuppressed patients have been well-reported in the literature. However, the clinical importance of PCP manifesting in the setting of an immunorestitution disease (IRD), defined as an acute symptomatic or paradoxical deterioration of a (presumably) preexisting infection, which is temporally related to the recovery of the immune system and is due to immunopathological damage associated with the reversal of immunosuppressive processes, has received relatively little attention until recently.     

Should we eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection in patients receiving nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs or low‐dose aspirin?

Whether Helicobacter pylori infection alters the risk of ulcer disease in patients receiving nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low‐dose aspirin is one of the most controversial topics in peptic ulcer research. This is an important management issue, particularly in countries where peptic ulcer disease is common and the prevalence of H. pylori infection is high. Current evidence shows that H. pylori infection increases the ulcer risk associated with NSAIDs or low‐dose aspirin. Eradication of H. pylori reduces the subsequent risk of endoscopic and complicated ulcers in patients who are about to start long‐term NSAIDs. Among patients with H. pylori infection and a history of ulcer bleeding who continue to use low‐dose aspirin, 1 week of eradication therapy prevents recurrent ulcer bleeding. Failure of eradication and concomitant use of NSAIDs, however, account for most cases of recurrent bleeding with low‐dose aspirin. The apparent protective effect of H. pylori in long‐term NSAIDs users reported in some studies was actually the weeding out of susceptible patients who were intolerant to NSAIDs. There is no convincing evidence that eradication of H. pylori has any clinically important adverse effect on the healing and prevention of ulcers in NSAIDs users.     

Inflammatory bowel disease: A survey of the epidemiology in Asia

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has long been considered a disease that affects predominantly a Western population. The incidence and prevalence rates from Asian populations are much lower in comparison. More recent data, however, have shown significantly higher rates in Asians and time trend studies have shown an increase in the incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) and a similar but lower rise in Crohn's disease (CD). The epidemiological changes that are taking place mirror that of the Western experience seen 50 years previously and seem to occur in parallel with the rapid socioeconomic development taking place in Asia. It appears that certain racial groups are more prone than others to develop IBD. For instance, Indians in South‐East Asia have higher rates compared to Chinese and Malays. While there is host genetic predisposition, environmental factor(s) may be responsible for this difference. Migrant studies of South Asians in the UK, where second‐generation immigrants have assumed incidence rates as high as the indigenous whites and Asian Jews who develop high incidence rates comparable to Jews from Europe or North America in Israel point to the role of environmental factors. It is unclear which specific factors are responsible. Studies have suggested a change in diet to a more Westernized one may underlie this epidemiological change in the Asian population. It is likely that there are racial groups amongst Asians who are more susceptible to IBD and who will demonstrate a higher frequency of IBD when exposed to putative environmental factors.     

盐酸帕罗西汀治疗胃肠疾病433例分析

常见胃肠疾病的临床症状常是非特异性及多样性,其中或多或少受到精神因素的影响［１］。为探索针对调整神经功能失调药物在治疗胃肠疾病中的作用,自１９９７年５月至１９９８年７月,我们在常规药物治疗的基础上加用盐酸帕罗西汀（赛乐特）治疗常见胃肠疾病４３３例,疗效满意,现报告如下。材料与方法一、研究对象４３３例胃肠疾病均依据临床表现、内镜、实验室及影象学检查明确诊断,其表１　主要胃肠道症状及治疗效果（例）恶心呕吐腹痛腹胀暖气大便次数及习惯改变吞咽障碍或吞咽不协调病例数１５６１２８８２４３１０有效数１３２１１…     

Management guidelines for uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia in the Asia-Pacific region: First Asian Pacific working party on functional dyspepsia

Dyspepsia is most optimally defined as pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen. The symptom complex may be caused by peptic ulcer disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux, or gastric cancer but is most often due to functional (or non-ulcer) dyspepsia. While upper endoscopy is the method of choice to determine the underlying cause of dyspepsia, it is expensive. A more pragmatic approach is needed in the Asia-Pacific region where health services are limited. A detailed treatment algorithm is given for managing patients presenting with new-onset dyspepsia and documented functional dyspepsia after endoscopy, and evidence to support this approach is reviewed. Prompt endoscopy is recommended for patients with alarm features. In patients without alarm features, treatment for 2–4 weeks with an empirical anti-secretory or prokinetic agent, followed by investigation using non-invasive Helicobacter pylori testing and treatment for patients who do not respond or relapse, is recommended. Trials of management strategies are now needed to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the approaches recommended.     

Effect of shunt surgery on spleen size, portal pressure and oesophageal varices in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension

Shunt surgery is considered to be the treatment of choice in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. There is little data on the effect of side-to-side lieno-renal (SSLR) shunt on oesophageal variceal size, splenic size and splenic pulp pressure (SPP) in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. We evaluated pre- and postoperatively endoscopic grading of varices, splenic size and SPP for predicting shunt patency in 86 patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: 56 with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) and 30 with non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF). The EHPVO patients with patent shunts (n= 47) showed significant reduction in SPP (pre-operative 43.56±7.9 vs postoperative 29.96±7.7 cm of saline), splenic size (6.5±2.8 vs 4.00±2.6 cm below costal margin) and varices grades (2.96±0.5 vs 0.92±0.8). Patients with blocked shunt (n= 9) did not show significant reduction in SPP and varices grades. However, there was reduction in spleen size (8.6±3.0 vs 6.3±4.3). In the NCPF group, 28 had patent shunts and showed significant reduction in SPP (46.3±13.5 vs 33.8±7.6 cm of saline), splenic size (9.1±3.3 vs 6.8±4.6 cm below costal margin) and varices grades (2.8±0.7 vs 1.05±0.96). As only two patients with NCPF had blocked shunts, no statistical comparison between patients with patent and patients with blocked shunts could be done. In conclusion, following SSLR, there is a significant reduction in SPP and varices grades in patients with patent shunts. Endoscopic grading of varices can be used to predict shunt patency. However, spleen size is not a good criteria for predicting shunt patency.