Modified Rives-Stoppa technique for repair of complex incisional hernias in 59 patients

Incisional hernias develop in 2% to 11% of patients who undergo laparotomy. Prosthetic mesh repair provides more strength, tension-free closure, and decreased recurrence rates as compared to primary tissue repairs. Complications-fistula formation, adhesions, skin erosion, and seroma/abscess formation-however, include increased rates of infection, sometimes requiring complete mesh removal. The Rives-Stoppa repair for complex incisional hernias confers the benefits of prosthetic repair and lower recurrence rates, but decreases certain complications by preventing direct mesh contact with the bowel. A total of 89 consecutive patients (mean age, 58.1) underwent a modified Rives-Stoppa repair for purposes of this review, all the patients who lost to follow-up before 6 months postoperatively were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 59 patients, 32.2% (n = 19) had expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh, and 67.8% (n = 40) had polypropylene mesh. Average range of follow-up was 40.0 months. Hernia recurred in 1 patient (1.7%). Infection requiring explantation of the prosthesis occurred in 3 patients (5.1%). The Rives-Stoppa repair is reportedly the best open technique for complex incisional hernias with comparatively lower recurrence rates. Additionally, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (64.4% of our series), who often require later reoperation for their primary disease, may benefit from this technique of herniorrhaphy where no interface exists between intrabdominal contents and the prosthesis. This lack of interface decreases intrabdominal adhesions and facilitates re-entry if future surgery is needed for inflammatory bowel disease.     

Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax Genotypes and Efficacy of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in Papua New Guinea

Intermittent preventive treatment of infants (IPTi) reduces early childhood malaria-related morbidity. While genotypic drug resistance markers have proven useful in predicting the efficacy of antimalarial drugs in case management, there are few equivalent data relating to their protective efficacy when used as IPTi. The present data from an IPTi trial in Papua New Guinea demonstrate how these markers can predict protective efficacy of IPTi for both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax.     

Abbreviated CT protocol for postoperative surveillance of renal cancer

Introduction

Postoperative surveillance protocols after nephrectomy for kidney cancer include periodic computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest and abdomen. A single study exposes the patient to 21 mSv (equivalent to 7-year exposure to natural background radiation). The objective of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that an abbreviated CT protocol restricted to the chest and upper abdomen (i.e., to the level of the intervertebral disk L3–L4) is sufficient for routine postnephrectomy follow-up as it detects most tumor recurrence with lower radiation exposure.

A prospective multicenter pilot study of HIV-positive deceased donor to HIV-positive recipient kidney transplantation: HOPE in action

HIV-positive donor to HIV-positive recipient (HIV D+/R+) transplantation is permitted in the United States under the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act. To explore safety and the risk attributable to an HIV+ donor, we performed a prospective multicenter pilot study comparing HIV D+/R+ vs HIV-negative donor to HIV+ recipient (HIV D−/R+) kidney transplantation (KT). From 3/2016 to 7/2019 at 14 centers, there were 75 HIV+ KTs: 25 D+ and 50 D− (22 recipients from D− with false positive HIV tests). Median follow-up was 1.7 years. There were no deaths nor differences in 1-year graft survival (91% D+ vs 92% D−, P = .9), 1-year mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (63 mL/min D+ vs 57 mL/min D−, P = .31), HIV breakthrough (4% D+ vs 6% D−, P > .99), infectious hospitalizations (28% vs 26%, P = .85), or opportunistic infections (16% vs 12%, P = .72). One-year rejection was higher for D+ recipients (50% vs 29%, HR: 1.83, 95% CI 0.84-3.95, P = .13) but did not reach statistical significance; rejection was lower with lymphocyte-depleting induction (21% vs 44%, HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.87, P = .03). In this multicenter pilot study directly comparing HIV D+/R+ with HIV D−/R+ KT, overall transplant and HIV outcomes were excellent; a trend toward higher rejection with D+ raises concerns that merit further investigation.