The influence of stimulus size on measured visual field extent in infants.

PURPOSE: To compare measured visual field extent for a 6 degrees stimulus (typical size used in studies of infants) with a 1.5 degrees stimulus (similar to the largest size used in Goldmann perimetry) in young infants. METHODS: A total of 120 infants (60 each at 3.5 months and 7 months of age) and 24 adults were tested monocularly with a kinetic perimetry procedure using a black double-arc perimeter. Each subject was tested with either a 6 degrees or 1.5 degrees white sphere, which was mounted on a black wand and moved smoothly toward the intersection of the perimeter arms at 3.4 degrees /s. Visual field extent along each perimeter arm was defined as the median of 2 to 3 measurements of the position of the leading edge of the stimulus when the subject made an eye movement toward the stimulus. RESULTS: The 6 degrees stimulus produced larger measured visual field extent than the 1.5 degrees stimulus in 3.5-month olds (temporal field only) and in 7-month olds (nasal and temporal field), but not in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Using the testing conditions of the present study, increasing stimulus size beyond the largest used in a Goldmann perimeter (approximately 2 degrees) increases measured visual field extent in young infants, but not in adults. This may relate to differences in peripheral summation areas or to differences in attentional factors between infants and adults.     

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia; a cause of cardiac arrest

Glossopharyngeal tic douloureux or neuralgia is a comparatively rare but well-recognized syndrome. In respect to the stabbing paroxysmal nature of the pain and its relation to specific trigger zones, it is exactly comparable to the commoner trigeminal tic douloureux. In neurosurgical clinics the two types of neuralgia occur in a ratio of about one to forty.The significance of cardiac arrest and syncope associated with glossopharyngeal neuralgia was first emphasized by Riley and associates,¹ in a brief report of two cases in 1942. This report called attention to the afferent pathway of the carotid sinus reflex through the glossopharyngeal nerve and suggested the correlation of the simultaneous neuralgia and excessive stimuli to the sinus reflex. Neither of the two cases was reported to have been subjected to operation. Since then, no other reports of similar cases have come to light in medical literature. However, one of us (Ray) had the opportunity of examining such a case with Dr. Jefferson Browder in 1943 and this patient was relieved of all symptoms by intracranial section of the glossopharyngeal nerve.Because of the importance of further establishing the authenticity of the syndrome and calling wider attention to the importance of its recognition, there is justification for reporting another comparable case.     

The use of the Impact on Sibling scale with families of children with chronic illness and developmental disability

Objective   This study evaluated the Impact on Sibling scale, a six-item measure of parents' perception of the effects of a child's illness on healthy siblings.
Methods   Participants were 122 parents of a child with chronic illness, developmental disability, or autism spectrum disorder, and a well sibling aged 4–13 years. Parents completed the Impact on Sibling scale and the Child Behavior Checklist about the sibling, and completed the revised Impact on Family scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory about themselves.
Results   The Impact on Sibling score was correlated with measures of sibling, parent and family functioning. The internal consistency of the Impact on Sibling scale was higher for families with children with chronic illness compared with the other two diagnostic groups.
Conclusion   The Impact on Sibling scale is a brief set of items that can help identify siblings who are negatively affected by a brother/sister's illness. Findings support further research on the Impact on Sibling scale, particularly with families of children with chronic illnesses.