Combined finasteride and flutamide therapy in men with advanced prostate cancer

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of combined finasteride and flutamide therapy in men with advanced prostate cancer by determining (1 ) the short-term tolerability of finasteride monotherapy and its effect on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and hormone (testosterone, dihydrotestosterone) levels, and (2) the effects of the addition of flutamide on tolerability and on serum PSA and hormone levels.

Methods

Thirteen hormone-naive men with advanced prostate cancer (4 with Stage D2, 1 with Stage D1, 1 with Stage DO, 7 with rising PSA levels after radical prostatectomy [n = 2]or definitive radiation therapy [n = 5]) were initially treated with 5 mg finasteride daily. Flutamide (250 mg three times a day) was added after serum PSA levels stabilized.

Results

Finasteride alone (median 5 weeks) had no significant effect on serum PSA levels (P>0.05). Combined finasteride and flutamide resulted in a mean 91% reduction in serum PSA levels, with 85% of men achieving a nadir serum PSA level of less than 4.0 ng/mL and 46% achieving undetectable levels (0.2 ng/mL or less). Finasteride alone had no significant effect on serum testosterone levels (P>0.05) but did result in a mean 74% reduction in serum dihydrotestosterone levels. Combined finasteride and flutamide resulted in a mean 56% increase in serum testosterone levels but had no additional effect on serum dihydrotestosterone levels (P>0.05). Side effects occurred in 85% (gynecomastia or breast tenderness in 62% [8 of 13]and diarrhea in 23% [3 of 13]) of men on combined therapy. Potency was preserved in 66%. Combined finasteride and flutamide therapy was withdrawn from 15% (2 of 13) because of flutamide-induced diarrhea and from 23% (3 of 13) because of disease progression. All remaining patients (8 of 13) have serum PSA levels below 4.0 ng/mL and 4 of these 8 have undetectable levels. These men have received combined finasteride and flutamide for a median 11 months (range 6 to 19).

Conclusions

Finasteride monotherapy is inadequate therapy for advanced prostate cancer, but combined finasteride and flutamide may be a reasonable alternative for men with advanced prostate cancer who refuse conventional hormone therapy.     

Magnetic resonance imaging accurately tracks kidney pathology and heterogeneity in the transition from acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease

1. Download : Download high-res image (366KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Nephron number and its determinants in early life: a primer

Although there is wide variation, humans possess on average 900,000 nephrons per kidney. So far as is known, nephrons cannot regenerate; therefore, an individual’s nephron endowment has profound implications in determining his or her long-term risk of developing chronic kidney disease. Most of the variability in human nephron number is determined early in life. Nephrogenesis is a complex and carefully orchestrated process that occurs during a narrow time window until 36 weeks gestation in humans, and disruption of any part of this sequence may lead to reduced nephron number. In utero, genetic abnormalities, toxic insults, and nutritional deficiencies can each alter final nephron number. Infants born prematurely must continue nephrogenesis in an ex utero environment where there may be multiple threats to successful nephrogenesis. Once the nephron endowment is determined, postnatal factors (such as acute kidney injury or chronic illnesses) can only decrease nephron number. Current techniques for estimating nephron number require an invasive procedure or complete destruction of the tissue, making noninvasive means for counting nephron surgently needed. A better understanding of nephron number and its determinants, particularly during growth and maturation, could allow the development of therapies to support, prolong, or resume nephrogenesis.     

A lowered salt intake does not compromise iodine status in Cape Town,South Africa,where salt iodization is mandatory

ObjectiveUniversal salt iodization is an effective strategy to optimize population-level iodine. At the same time as salt-lowering initiatives are encouraged globally, there is concern about compromised iodine intakes. This study investigated whether salt intakes at recommended levels resulted in a suboptimal iodine status in a country where salt is the vehicle for iodine fortification.MethodsThree 24-h urine samples were collected for the assessment of urinary sodium and one sample was taken for urinary iodine concentrations (UICs) in a convenience sample of 262 adult men and women in Cape Town, South Africa. Median UIC was compared across categories of sodium excretion equivalent to salt intakes lower than 5, 5 to 9, and greater than or equal to 9 g/d.ResultsThe median UIC was 120 μg/L (interquartile range 75.3–196.3), indicating iodine sufficiency. Less one-fourth (23.2%) of subjects had urinary sodium excretion values within the desirable range (salt <5 g/d), 50.7% had high values (5–9 g/d), and 22.8% had very high values (≥9 g/d). No association between urinary iodine and mean 3 × 24-h urinary sodium concentration was found (r = 0.087, P = 0.198) and UIC status did not differ according to urinary sodium categories (P = 0.804).ConclusionIn a country with mandatory universal salt iodization, consumers with salt intakes within the recommended range (<5 g/d) are iodine replete, and median UIC does not differ across categories of salt intake. This indicates that much of the dietary salt is provided from non-iodinated sources, presumably added to processed foods.