Factors influencing epidural catheter migration

The incidence and amount of migration of epidural catheters was investigated in a prospective randomised study of 153 women who required analgesia in labour. Inward or outward migration occurred in 36% of patients. Inward migration by 1-3 cm occurred in 21 (13.7%) patients and outward migration by 1 cm or more occurred in 34 (22.2%); three (2%) catheters migrated out through the skin. There were significant positive correlations between outward migration and weight, body mass index, and depth of the epidural space. There was no relationship between migration and height, age, intervertebral space used or duration of catheterisation. Problems with epidural block were no more likely in patients in whom migration of 1 cm or more occurred compared with those in whom migration was limited to a maximum of +/- 0.5 cm. However, the pattern of problems was different. All cases of failed epidural block occurred in patients whose epidural catheter migrated outward by 2.5 cm or more. Unilateral blockade was not more likely if migration of 1 cm or more occurred.     

盐酸放线瑞香宁的紫外二阶导数光谱法测定及在兔体内的药代动力学

盐酸放线瑞香宁(actinodaphine-HCl)系从莲叶桐科青藤属植物黑吹风(Illigera khasiana C.B Clarke)中分离提取而得的有效成分,结构式如图1。药理试验证明有解热、镇痛、解痉等作用。本文报告用紫外二阶导数光谱法研究盐酸放线瑞香宁在兔体内的药代动力学结果。家兔4只,体重2.8±0.6kg。盐酸放线瑞香宁由本所植化室提供。氯仿、乙醇均为A.R。Perkin-Elmer型紫外—可见光分光光度计系美国产品。     

A randomized controlled trial of sedation in the critically ill

A randomized controlled trial comparing: a) a combination of oral chloral hydrate and promethazine to b) a continuous intravenous midazolam infusion, for maintenance sedation in critically ill children, was carried out. The level of sedation was assessed four hourly using a specifically devized sedation scale. Forty-four children entered the study of whom two were subsequently excluded. The number of satisfactory assessments (desired and actual levels of sedation equal) was significantly greater in the chloral hydrate and promethazine group (Chi-squared P <0.01; confidence intervals of the difference 0.06 to 0.20). The number of assessments at level 5 on the sedation scale (patient restless/distressed) was significantly greater in the midazolam group (Chi-squared P <0.05). The total number of satisfactory assessments in the two groups were only 61 and 48% respectively, suggesting that sedation can be considerably improved. Chloral hydrate and promethazine are more effective than midazolam as maintenance sedation in critically ill children. It is possible to prospectively study the efficacy of sedative drugs in critically ill children.     

Efficacy, Dose-Response, and Safety of Ondansetron in Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Quantitative Systematic Review of Randomized Placebo-controlled Trials

Objective: The authors reviewed efficacy and safety data for ondansetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Methods: Systematically searched, randomized, controlled trials (obtained through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts, manufacturer's database, manual searching of journals, and article reference lists) were analyzed. Relevant end points were prevention of early PONV (within 6 h after surgery) and late PONV (within 48 h) and adverse effects. Relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat were calculated. The number-needed-to-treat indicated how many patients had to be exposed to ondansetron to prevent PONV in one of them who would have vomited or been nauseated had he or she received placebo.

Results: Fifty-three trials were found that had data from 7,177 patients receiving 24 different ondansetron regimens and from 5,712 controls receiving placebo or no treatment. Average early and late PONV incidences without ondansetron were 40% and 60%, respectively. There was a dose response for oral and intravenous ondansetron. Best number-needed-to-treat to prevent PONV with the best documented regimens was between 5 and 6. This was achieved with an intravenous dose of 8 mg and an oral dose of 16 mg. Antivomiting efficacy was consistently better than antinausea efficacy. Efficacy in children was poorly documented. Ondansetron significantly increased the risk for elevated liver enzymes (number-needed-to-harm was 31) and headache (number-needed-to-harm was 36).     

Observing decision‐making in the general practice consultation: who makes which decisions?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate opportunities for, and types of decision making in the general practice (primary care) consultation, and examine differences in skills of those doctors who are successful at meeting their patients' preferences and those who are less successful. DESIGN: Observation study of doctor-patient consultations in general practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending for routine appointments in 12 general practice surgeries across Oxfordshire. METHODS: A total of 212 doctor-patient consultations were video-recorded. The patients involved completed a questionnaire to elicit their perceptions of how decisions were made. The video-taped recordings were coded with a new instrument, the Evidence Based Patient Choice Instrument (EBPCI), to classify the number and type of decision-making opportunities arising during each consultation. A total of 149 recordings were coded using the Oxbridge Rating Scale to assess the doctors' consultation styles. RESULTS: There was a range of decision-making opportunities in addition to those involving medical treatment. With the exception of 'fitness for work', decisions were generally 'doctor led'. There was only moderate agreement between patient perceptions of their level of involvement in decision making and the objective ratings using the EBPCI. There was wide variation in the ability of doctors to meet their patients' preferences for involvement. CONCLUSIONS: There are many decisions made in primary care consultations, in addition to those about medical treatments, in which patients could be involved to a greater extent than they currently are. Some doctors are significantly better than others at meeting different patients' preferences for their decision-making role. Patients' perceptions of shared decision making appears to be influenced by the doctors' general consultation skills.     

Patient-controlled analgesia in children. A comparison of two infusion techniques

The effectiveness of patient-controlled intravenous morphine with and without a supplementary fixed rate infusion was studied in 40 children after orthopaedic surgery and 40 children after abdominal surgery. The use of a background infusion after orthopaedic surgery, where the majority of children received intra-operative regional blockade, resulted in a higher total dose of morphine (P < 0.05) without evidence of improved analgesia, compared to PCA alone. Children receiving a background infusion after abdominal surgery showed evidence of improved sleeping patterns post-operatively compared with those receiving PCA alone, despite similar overall morphine consumption. There were no episodes of excessive sedation, or respiratory depression with the use of either regimen, and over 90% of the children studied were assessed as experiencing either no pain or mild pain. The suitability and efficacy of patient controlled analgesia for management of post-operative pain for children aged between 5 and 17 years appears to be confirmed. The use of a supplementary background infusion may be of value in children.     

What is the difference between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix? A matched case–control study

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of treatment strategies in patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) of the cervix and compare it with those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix. Women with FIGO (1994) stage IB1 AC, especially pathologic tumor size of 2-4 cm, treated with class III hysterectomy, were compared with those with SCC treated with comparable strategy in a case-controlled study. Eighty patients (20 cases, 60 controls) were analyzed. Lymphvascular space invasion (P = 0.01) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.07) were more frequent in patients with SCC than in those with AC. However, there was no significant difference in depth of stromal invasion (P = 0.51) and invasion of the parametrium (P = 0.44) between two groups. And there was also no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.86) and overall survival (P = 0.89) between two groups. Primary radical surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, same as for SCC, would be acceptable for AC with pathologic tumor size of 2-4 cm. Although it was difficult to determine whether AC recurred more systemically, more effective treatment strategies than those currently available for AC should be considered to reduce the systemic recurrence.