Application of the “risk of ambulatory disability” (RoAD) score in a “real‐world” single‐center multiple sclerosis cohort

Survival analysis of reaching EDSS ≥4.0 based on RoAD score ≥4 (dashed line) and <4 (solid line) by Cox regression analysis. (A) Unadjusted regression analysis. (B) Regression controlled for sex and immunotherapy groups, and the trajectory of treatment changes during follow‐up.     

Postnatal confirmation of prenatally diagnosed trisomy 20 mosaicism in a patient with linear and whorled nevoid hypermelanosis

Linear and whorled nevoid hypermelanosis (LWNH) is characterized by hyperpigmented reticulate macules in a Blaschko linear arrangement without atrophy or preceding inflammation. Underlying chromosomal mosaicism was often assumed, but has been verified in only a few published cases. We report a 7-year-old boy with LWNH associated with congenital ventricular septal defect and psychomotor retardation. Prenatal chromosomal analysis of amniocytes revealed trisomy 20 mosaicism, which was not confirmed in peripheral blood lymphocytes after birth. Histologic sections of skin biopsy specimens taken at age 6 years showed hyperpigmentation of the basal epidermal layer with prominent melanocytes and isolated melanophages in the upper dermis. Cytogenetic analysis of cultured skin fibroblasts revealed an extra chromosome 20 in 5 of the 30 metaphases studied (17%). Mosaic trisomy 20 is one of the most common autosomal mosaicisms identified in amniocytes and is, as a rule, compatible with normal pregnancy outcome. In postnatal analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes, an extra chromosome 20 could never be detected. However, when confirmed in skin fibroblasts, trisomy 20 mosaicism may be associated with systemic anomalies. The present case shows for the first time an association of LWNH with trisomy 20 mosaicism and emphasizes the importance of analyzing skin fibroblasts in cases of prenatally diagnosed trisomy 20.     

Successful Treatment with Atomoxetine of an Adolescent Boy with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder,Extreme Obesity,and Reduced Melanocortin 4 Receptor Function

ObjectiveRecent case reports suggest a link between reduced melanocortinergic tone and both obesity and attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We present the case of a 13-year-old, male, obese MC4R mutation carrier with ADHD.Case ReportThe boy carries a heterozygous mutation in the melanocortin 4 receptor gene (MC4R; Met281Val), that leads to a reduced receptor function. Dominant mutations of this type represent major gene effects for obesity. He participated in a lifestyle intervention program for obesity and received treatment with the selective norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitor atomoxetine for 31 months. The boy markedly reduced his BMI from 47.2 to 29.6 kg/m².ConclusionAtomoxetine proved to efficiently reduce weight in a severely obese MC4R mutation carrier with ADHD. We briefly discuss possible mechanisms for our observation, including evidence for the functional connectivity between melanocortinergic, dopaminergic, and norepinephrinergic brain circuitries.Key Words: Pharmacogenetics, Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Weight loss, Appetite control, Methylphenidate     

Mapping Different Intra-Hemispheric Parietal-Motor Networks Using Twin Coil TMS

BackgroundAccumulating evidence suggests anatomical and functional differences in connectivity between the anterior and posterior parts of the inferior-parietal lobule (IPL) and the frontal motor areas.Objective/HypothesisThis study investigates whether different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor interactions can be observed along the anterior–posterior axis of the IPL in the resting human brain.MethodsWe use a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to test intra-hemispheric interactions between three points adjacent to the intra-parietal sulcus (anterior, central, posterior) and the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1) at rest in both hemispheres.ResultsWe found that stimulation of the anterior IPL resulted in an inhibition of the ipsilateral M1 in both hemispheres. Stimulation of the central and posterior IPL resulted in a facilitatory effect on ipsilateral M1 in the left but not for the right hemisphere. Additionally we show that there is considerable inter-subject variability concerning the optimal parietal facilitatory and inhibitory position.ConclusionsThe IPL has distinct inhibitory and facilitatory connections to the ipsilateral M1. Whereas inhibitory connections are observed in both hemispheres, facilitatory connections are asymmetric. These parietal-motor networks may represent the basis for the functional differences between these regions in reaching and grasping tasks and mirror the functional asymmetry observed in the motor system. From a practical point of view, we note that the inter-subject variability means that future TMS studies of the parietal area might consider a hot-spot localization similar to the procedures commonly used for M1.