Patient education in Western European hospitals: a comparison of the Netherlands, Flanders and England

OBJECTIVE: This research describes the organization of patient education in hospitals and the conditions that influence this in the Netherlands, Flanders and England. METHODS: The research consists of document analysis and interviews. RESULTS: On the organizational level, there can be a patient information desk (England and the Netherlands) and/or a specialized officer on patient education (the Netherlands and England). In the three countries/regions, the organization of patient education on the program level, for patient groups, is characterized by consultations of specialized nurses, patient information materials and patient education policy. Expert centers stimulate patient education through training and quality projects. Lobbying by patient organizations is important for the setting up of patient education. Both expert centers and patient organizations are financially dependent on and respond to policy of the government. CONCLUSION: Patient education is mostly organized on the organizational level or the program level, or both. Patient organizations and expert centers are conditions that are dependent on the government. Government policy and subsidies are considered as the most important conditions for the organization of patient education in hospitals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Commitment of officers working in patient education to the Health Promoting Hospital project and the European Association for Communication in Healthcare could stimulate patient education.     

Judging surface slant for placing objects: a role for motion parallax

People have a variety of sources of information (cues) about surface slant at their disposal. We used a simple placing task to evaluate the relative importance of three such cues (motion parallax, binocular disparity and texture) within the space in which people normally manipulate objects. To do so, we projected a stimulus onto a rotatable screen. This allowed us to manipulate texture cues independently of binocular disparity and motion parallax. We asked people to stand in front of the screen and place a cylinder on the screen. We analysed the cylinder’s orientation just before contact. Participants mainly relied on binocular cues (weight between 50 and 90%), in accordance with binocular cues being known to be reliable when the stimulus surface is nearby and almost frontal. Texture cues contributed between 2 and 18% to the estimated slant. Motion parallax was given a weight between 1 and 9%, despite the fact that it only provided information when the head began to move, which was just before the arm did. Thus motion parallax is used to judge surface slant, even when one is under the impression of standing still.