Enhanced terminal room disinfection and acquisition and infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium diffcile(the Benefits of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection study):a cluster-randomised,multicentre,crossover study

中文:背景患者入院后可从不当消毒的环境表面获得多药耐药菌和艰难梭菌。本文确定了3种强化的终末消毒(入住同一病房的两名患者之间的消毒)策略,对感染耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)、艰难梭菌(CD)和多重耐药不动杆菌的影响。方法本文在美国东南部的9家医院开展了一项务实的、集群-随机、交叉研究。凡曾有感染或定植目标细菌感染患者居住过的病房,患者出院后随机采取4种消毒策略中的一种方法进行终末消毒:对照(季胺盐类消毒剂消毒,但凡遇到CD采用含氯消毒剂);UV(季胺盐类+UV-C消毒,但凡遇到CD采用含氯消毒剂+UV-C);含氯消毒剂;含氯消毒剂+UV-C。凡入住目标病房的患者被列为暴露人群。这4种终末消毒方法分别在每家医院连续实施7个月的周期。本文随机设计这几种消毒策略在每家医院内的实施顺序(1:1:1:1)。主要产出的结果是,观察暴露患者中目标细菌的感染的发生或定植情况,以及ITT人群中暴露患者CD感染发生率。本研究ClinicalTrials.gov注册编号:NCT01579370。结果共有31 226名患者暴露,其中21 395(69%)符合标准,包括4 916名对照组,5 178名UV组,5 438名含氯消毒剂组,以及5 863名含氯消毒剂+UV组。在对照组中,22 426个暴露日中有115名患者发生目标细菌的感染(51.3/10000暴露日)。在标准清洁策略的基础上增加UV消毒的暴露患者,其目标细菌感染的发生率明显较低(n=76;33.9/10 000暴露日;RR:0.70,95%CI:0.50～0.988;P=0.036)。含氯消毒剂组(n=101;41.6/10 000暴露日;RR:0.85,95%CI:0.69～1.04;P=0.116),或含氯消毒剂+UV组患者(n=131;45.6/10 000暴露日;RR:0.91,95%CI:0.76～1.09;P=0.303)的目标细菌的感染率,其差异无统计学意义。同样,在含氯消毒剂的基础上增加UV消毒,暴露患者中CD感染率也没有发生改变((n=38 vs 36;30.4 vs 31.6/10 000暴露日;RR:1.0,95%CI:0.57-1.75;P=0.997)。解释污染的医疗机构环境是获得病原微生物的重要来源;强化终末消毒可以降低这一风险。     

Ensuring content validity of patient-reported outcomes: a shadow-test approach to their adaptive measurement

Purpose

Most computerized adaptive testing (CAT) applications in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measurement to date are reliability-centric, with a primary objective of maximizing measurement efficiency. A key concern and a potential threat to validity is that, when left unconstrained, individual CAT administrations could have items with systematically different attributes, e.g., sub-domain coverage. This paper aims to provide a solution to the problem from an optimal test design framework using the shadow-test approach to CAT.

Methods

Following the approach, a case study was conducted using the PROMIS^® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) fatigue item bank both with empirical and simulated response data. Comparisons between CAT administrations without and with the enforcement of content and item pool usage constraints were examined.

Results

The unconstrained CAT exhibited a high degree of variation in items selected from different substrata of the item bank. Contrastingly, the shadow-test approach delivered CAT administrations conforming to all specifications with a minimal loss in measurement efficiency.

Conclusions

The optimal test design and shadow-test approach to CAT provide a flexible framework for solving complex test-assembly problems with better control of their domain coverage than for the conventional use of CAT in PRO measurement. Applications in a wide array of PRO domains are expected to lead to more controlled and balanced use of CAT in the field.

     

Motives for Filing a False Allegation of Rape

The list of motives by Kanin (1994) is the most cited list of motives to file a false allegation of rape. Kanin posited that complainants file a false allegation out of revenge, to produce an alibi or to get sympathy. A new list of motives is proposed in which gain is the predominant factor. In the proposed list, complainants file a false allegation out of material gain, emotional gain, or a disturbed mental state. The list can be subdivided into eight different categories: material gain, alibi, revenge, sympathy, attention, a disturbed mental state, relabeling, or regret. To test the validity of the list, a sample of 57 proven false allegations were studied at and provided by the National Unit of the Dutch National Police (NU). The complete files were studied to ensure correct classification by the NU and to identify the motives of the complainants. The results support the overall validity of the list. Complainants were primarily motivated by emotional gain. Most false allegations were used to cover up other behavior such as adultery or skipping school. Some complainants, however, reported more than one motive. A large proportion, 20% of complainants, said that they did not know why they filed a false allegation. The results confirm the complexity of motivations for filing false allegations and the difficulties associated with archival studies. In conclusion, the list of Kanin is, based on the current results, valid but insufficient to explain all the different motives of complainants to file a false allegation.