Mayo's Older Americans Normative Studies: Visual Form Discrimination and copy trial of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure

Age-adjusted normative data are presented for persons age 70-89 years for the Visual Form Discrimination Test and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (copy trial only). Adjustment for the effect of education on test performance is also provided. These data were collected as part of Mayo's Older Americans Normative Studies (MOANS). The normative information provided here should prove useful for characterizing performance on these measures as well as comparing the person's performance against his or her functioning on any other test with MOANS norms. Limitations and unique features of the MOANS normative data are also discussed.     

Egg sharing and egg donation: attitudes of British egg donors and recipients

The question of payment to egg donors has recently focused the attention of both the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) and licensed clinics. An acute shortage of egg donors and the rising costs of assisted conception treatment are matters of grave concern to many patients. To understand the emotional and social effects of egg sharing and egg donation, we conducted a survey of attitudes in a group of women who had some knowledge or experience of egg donation. A total of 750 questionnaires were sent out of which 217 were returned within the specified time limit. From these, 107 respondents had experience of egg donation and 110 had made enquiries about donation. The data from these questionnaires were collated and tabulated by the National Opinion Polls (NOP) Research Group. An analysis of the data produced the following key findings: (i) donating or sharing eggs is a social issue, 94% discuss it with partners/family/friends; (ii) altruistic motives are not the prerogative of non-patient volunteers-egg share donors felt that helping the childless was as important as having a chance of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) for themselves; (iii) the treatment procedure causes the most anxiety for egg donors. The recipients were most concerned about delays, donor characteristics and how the eggs were allocated; (iv) most respondents (65%) with prior experience of egg sharing would do it again - 63% of egg share donors, 72% of egg share recipients; (v) cash rewards to egg donors and outright advertising for donors were rejected by 64 and 62% of the sample respectively; and (vi) counselling was highly valued and there were no instances of 'shattered lives' after treatment. The findings do not support the recently announced intentions of the HFEA to disallow payment to gamete donors on the grounds of devalued consent. There is no precedent in modern medicine for egg sharing. The patients surveyed drew a clear distinction between egg sharing and financial rewards. As long as egg donation is not covered by the National Health Service, it is fairer to offer egg sharing than to refuse treatment to those unable to pay.      

Taking tissue seriously means taking communities seriously

Background  

Health research is increasingly being conducted on a global scale, particularly in the developing world to address leading causes of morbidity and mortality. While research interest has increased, building scientific capacity in the developing world has not kept pace. This often leads to the export of human tissue (defined broadly) from the developing to the developed world for analysis. These practices raise a number of important ethical issues that require attention.     

Pregnancy following intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment with dead husband's spermatozoa: ethical and policy considerations

This paper describes the first pregnancy in a childless widow after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment with her deceased husband's spermatozoa which had been stored for nearly 3 years before use. Before his death the husband had received treatment for testicular cancer and he had given the appropriate written consent for the future use of his spermatozoa. Of the 10 eggs injected, six resulted in normal embryos. Three embryos were transferred and the remaining three embryos are currently stored for possible future use. The treatment resulted in a continuing singleton pregnancy. The case demonstrated the suitability of ICSI in those difficult cases where the sperm quality is extremely poor. This success is also compared with a widely debated case of another widow who was refused permission to use her deceased husband's spermatozoa. It is concluded that in the case of posthumous use of frozen spermatozoa, the current laws are conveniently applicable in a chronic illness but not so in an acute illness leading to death. In the light of the wide public debate on the issues raised by this legal case, the UK Government has also decided to conduct a review of consent procedures involving the storage and use of genetic material.