Separation of aceclofenac and diclofenac in human plasma by free zone capillary electrophoresis using N-methyl-D-glucamine as an effective electrolyte additive.

Aceclofenac (A) and diclofenac (D) are effective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) derived from the phenylacetic acid with pronounced antirheumatic, anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic properties. Our work proposes a new, fast-free zone capillary electrophoresis method for the simultaneous determination of aceclofenac and diclofenac in human plasma. The effect of increasing concentrations of N-methyl-D-glucamine organic base on borate run buffer was investigated. A good separation was achieved using a 40 cm x 75 microm uncoated silica capillary, 300 mmol/l sodium borate buffer, 200 mmol/l N-methyl-D-glucamine, pH 8.9, in about 3 min. Moreover, the plasma sample pre-treatment procedure was examined: acidic precipitants such as trichloroacetic acid (TCA), metaphosphoric acid (MPA), perchloric acid (PCA) or 5-sulphosalicylic acid (SSA) cause a total loss of analytes while acetonitrile allows a recovery of 97-98% of both compounds. Its simplicity and rapidity and the low analysis costs demonstrate that our method is a reliable and efficient mean for the comprehensive determination of aceclofenac and diclofenac in human plasma when pharmacokinetics studies are required.     

Endovascular repair for concomitant multilevel aortic disease.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with multilevel aortic disease represent a small subgroup with the need for extensive surgical treatment at considerable risk. We present our experience of endovascular exclusion for simultaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic disease in four patients. METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2005, four patients underwent endovascular repair for simultaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic disease. Mean age was 69+/-10 years (range, 60-81). Thoracic lesions included penetrating aortic ulcer (n=2, ruptured=1), atherosclerotic aneurysm (n=1), and chronic type B dissection (n=1). Abdominal aortic disease included atherosclerotic infrarenal (n=3) and juxtarenal (n=1) aortic aneurysms. Thoracic aortic stent-grafts had been the following: Excluder/TAG (n=3) or Talent (n=1) straight tube devices. Abdominal aortic stent-grafts used were as following: Excluder (n=3) or Zenith (n=1). All patients were followed-up with CT-angiography and chest X-rays 1, 4, 12 months after the procedure, and once per year thereafter. RESULTS: Stent-graft deployment was technically successful in all cases. Intraoperative mortality was not observed. Mean procedure time was 94+/-34 min (range, 70-145). Early postoperative complications occurred in one patient that developed acute renal failure but dialysis was not required. Mean hospitalisation was 8+/-5 days (range, 4-15). Late death occurred in one patient for an undetected ruptured thoracic type 1 endoleak. All three survivors are currently well 16.5 months (range, 3-36) after surgery. No neurological complications developed. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous abdominal and thoracic endovascular repair for multilevel aortic disease is feasible and could be a viable alternative in high-risk patients, who otherwise may not be suitable candidates for conventional repair.     

Reply to 'Olfactometric and rhinomanometric outcomes in post-menopausal women treated with hormone therapy: a prospective study'

Sir, The comment of Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo et al. was very interesting.They reported the results of their studies on the effects ofintranasal and transdermal     

Stable preference for high ethanol concentrations after ethanol deprivation in Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) rats.

Results of a recent study have demonstrated that exposure to multiple ethanol concentrations and repeated ethanol deprivation periods in Indiana ethanol-preferring (P) rats resulted in the development of an alcohol deprivation effect (ADE; the temporary increase in voluntary ethanol intake after a period of deprivation from ethanol) characterized by consumption of intoxicating amounts of ethanol. The current study was designed to possibly extend these results to Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) rats, generated with the same selective program previously used for P rats. To this aim, ethanol-naive sP rats were exposed initially to the home cage four-bottle choice [10%, 20%, and 30% (vol./vol.) ethanol solutions and water] for eight consecutive weeks. Subsequently, rats were divided into two groups: The first group had continuous access to the four-bottle regimen (nondeprived rats), and the second group was exposed to five cycles of 14-day periods of deprivation from ethanol and 14-day periods of reexposure to the four-bottle regimen. An ADE developed after each deprivation period. However, the extra intake of ethanol was limited to the first hour of each reaccess period. Magnitude of ADE did not change with repeated periods of deprivation. However, a shift in preference toward the two highest concentrations of ethanol solutions was evident from the first reexposure to ethanol and was maintained throughout the study. These results provide further evidence on the heterogeneity of ethanol-drinking behavior among rat lines selectively bred for high ethanol preference and consumption.     

Sodium removal and sodium concentration during peritoneal dialysis: effects of three methods of sodium measurement.

BACKGROUND: Sodium removal (NaR) may have a major impact on the survival of peritoneal dialysis patients. The dialysate/plasma sodium concentration ratio (D/P(Na)) is an indirect index of transcellular water transport by aquaporin channels, and thus of ultrafiltration. Sodium concentration can be assessed by means of flame photometry (F), and direct (D-ISE) or indirect ion-selective electrodes (I-ISE), but these methods have different properties. I-ISE is being used increasingly in clinical laboratories. The aim of this study was to evaluate NaR and D/P(Na) using the three different measurement methods. METHODS: We performed peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) in 44 peritoneal dialysis patients and calculated the NaR. We also calculated D/P(Na) during the test; plasma and dialysate sodium concentrations were measured by F, D-ISE and I-ISE. RESULTS: NaR was lower (P<0.001) with D-ISE (69+/-29 mmol) than with F (81+/-29 mmol) or I-ISE (79+/-28 mmol). D/P(Na) was also lower at baseline (0.92+/-0.02 vs 0.95+/-0.02 and 0.95+/-0.02; P<0.001), after 60 min (0.87+/-0.03 vs 0.90+/-0.03 and 0.90+/-0.03; P<0.001) and at the end of PET (0.88+/-0.04 vs 0.92+/-0.04 and 0.92+/-0.04; P<0.001) when measured by D-ISE in comparison with F and I-ISE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NaR and D/P(Na) were lower when measured by the D-ISE method compared with the F and I-ISE methods. NaR and D/P(Na) were similar when measured by F or I-ISE. I-ISE can be used reliably in the evaluation of NaR and D/P(Na) in everyday clinical practice of peritoneal dialysis.