收费全文 | 1555篇 |
免费 | 104篇 |
国内免费 | 2篇 |
耳鼻咽喉 | 23篇 |
儿科学 | 39篇 |
妇产科学 | 44篇 |
基础医学 | 188篇 |
口腔科学 | 15篇 |
临床医学 | 104篇 |
内科学 | 271篇 |
皮肤病学 | 47篇 |
神经病学 | 97篇 |
特种医学 | 69篇 |
外科学 | 292篇 |
综合类 | 109篇 |
一般理论 | 3篇 |
预防医学 | 120篇 |
眼科学 | 30篇 |
药学 | 119篇 |
中国医学 | 5篇 |
肿瘤学 | 86篇 |
2023年 | 13篇 |
2022年 | 26篇 |
2021年 | 67篇 |
2020年 | 38篇 |
2019年 | 44篇 |
2018年 | 60篇 |
2017年 | 36篇 |
2016年 | 40篇 |
2015年 | 57篇 |
2014年 | 48篇 |
2013年 | 77篇 |
2012年 | 143篇 |
2011年 | 126篇 |
2010年 | 71篇 |
2009年 | 58篇 |
2008年 | 96篇 |
2007年 | 92篇 |
2006年 | 59篇 |
2005年 | 67篇 |
2004年 | 61篇 |
2003年 | 67篇 |
2002年 | 56篇 |
2001年 | 41篇 |
2000年 | 26篇 |
1999年 | 35篇 |
1998年 | 14篇 |
1997年 | 4篇 |
1996年 | 5篇 |
1995年 | 9篇 |
1994年 | 5篇 |
1993年 | 11篇 |
1992年 | 8篇 |
1991年 | 7篇 |
1990年 | 4篇 |
1989年 | 7篇 |
1988年 | 4篇 |
1987年 | 4篇 |
1986年 | 5篇 |
1985年 | 8篇 |
1984年 | 5篇 |
1983年 | 7篇 |
1981年 | 3篇 |
1980年 | 3篇 |
1979年 | 6篇 |
1977年 | 3篇 |
1976年 | 6篇 |
1975年 | 7篇 |
1974年 | 4篇 |
1972年 | 7篇 |
1968年 | 2篇 |
Objectives
The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI) in women who have suffered anal sphincter injury in their previous pregnancy and analyse risk factors for recurrence through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources
A review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were made in Ovid MEDLINE (1996 to May 2015), PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar, including bibliographies and conference proceedings.Methods of study selection
Observational studies (cohort/case–control) evaluating rOASI and risk factors were selected by two reviewers who also analysed methodological quality of those studies. Pooled odds ratios (OR) for rOASI and individual risk factors were calculated using RevMan 5.3.Tabulation, integration and results
From the eight studies assessed, overall risk of rOASI was 6.3 % compared with a 5.7 % risk of OASI in the first pregnancy. The risk in parous women with no previous OASI was 1.5 %. Factors that increased the risk in a future pregnancy were instrumental delivery with forceps [OR 3.12, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.42–4.01) or ventouse (OR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.83–3.25), previous fourth-degree tear (OR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.24–2.36) and birth weight ≥4 kg (OR 2.29, 95 % CI 2.06–2.54). Maternal age ≥35 years marginally increased the risk (OR 1.16, 95 % CI 1–1.35).Conclusion
The overall rate of rOASI and associated risk factors for recurrence are similar to the rate and risk factors of primary OASI. Antenatal decisions could be based on assessment of foetal weight and intrapartum decisions based upon the requirement for an instrumental delivery.![点击此处可从《Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
The traditional way to tackle Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) has been flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD). Recently, the concept of per oral endoscopic myotomy has been found useful for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus and has been termed DPOEM. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-POEM in diverticular disease of the esophagus and to compare it with FESD. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, for studies reporting clinical success, technical success and adverse events in D-POEM alone or D-POEM comparing with FESD. We computed pooled prevalence for D-POEM alone and risk ratio for D-POEM vs FESD using random effect method with inverse variance approach. Subgroup analysis for ZD, non-ZD and mixed diverticulum was conducted. Totally 19 studies including 341 patients were identified reporting on D-POEM. The pooled clinical, technical success and adverse event rates for D-POEM were 87.07%, 95.19% and 10.22%, respectively. The clinical success was significantly better than FESD while the technical success, adverse event rate, procedure time and length of hospital stay were comparable with FESD. The recurrence rate was negligible for D-POEM compared to FESD. On subgroup analysis by dividing into three groups of ZD, non-ZD and mixed, there was no difference between clinical, technical success and adverse event rate among the three groups. D-POEM is an effective and safe technique among both ZD and non-ZD patients and has better clinical success than FESD.
相似文献