Is the alpha-beta ratio of prostate cancer really low? A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing standard and hyperfractionated conformal radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objectives of the current study were to compare genito-urinary (GU) and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicities as well as biochemical control (bRFS) in prostate cancer, utilizing conventional (2.0 Gy daily) (STD) or hyperfractionated (HFX) conformal irradiation (CRT). HFX (1.2 Gy BID) was chosen as a radiobiological method to try to reduce long term sequelae without compromising local control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three-hundred-and-seventy consecutive patients (pts) entered this prospective, non-randomized trial in the period January 1993-January 2003; 209 were treated with STD and 161 with HFX CRT. All were evaluable for acute toxicity analysis, 179 (STD) and 151 pts (HFX) being evaluable for late sequelae and bRFS analyses. Pt characteristics were not statistically different in the two groups. CRT consisted of a 4-field technique for prostate and/or pelvic nodes and a 5-field boost with rectal shielding. Median doses were 74 and 79.2 Gy for STD and HFX patients respectively, the latter dose being isoeffective for tumour control assuming alpha/beta=10 (EQD(2)=73.9 Gy). Median follow-up was 29.4 months (25.2 mos for STD; 37.7 mos for HFX; P<0.01). The two regimens were compared in terms of acute and late GU and GI toxicities and 5-year bRFS by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Acute grade> or =2 GU toxicity was higher in the STD group (48.6% versus 37.3% in HFX, P=0.03), while no significant difference was found for acute GI toxicity. Late grade> or =2 GU and GI toxicities were lower in the HFX group (5-year actuarial rate: GU: 10.1% versus 20.3%, P=0.05; GI: 6.0% versus 10.6%, P=0.18). Five-year bRFS were 70% (+/-13.8%, 95% CI) and 82.6% (+/-7.2%) for STD and HFX, respectively (P=0.44); a trend favouring HFX was found in the subgroup of pts who did not receive hormonal therapy (5-year bRFS: 85.9%+/-12.4% versus 63.9%+/-23.8%, P=0.15). Multivariate analysis revealed only risk groups and age statistically related to bRFS but not fractionation regimen. Using the Nahum-Chapman TLCP model and prostate parameter set, which includes hypoxia, the TLCPs are approximately equal for the two regimens, whereas assuming alpha/beta=1.5 and no hypoxia we obtain 73% for the STD group but only 36% for the HFX group. CONCLUSIONS: As expected from radiobiological considerations, HFX reduces GI and GU late toxicities. Concerning early bRFS, our clinical findings suggest that HFX is no less effective than STD when delivering an isoeffective (alpha/beta=10) dose. Despite the relatively short follow-up, this result appears to be inconsistent with a low alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer.     

Mapping molecular networks using proteomics: a vision for patient-tailored combination therapy.

Mapping tumor cell protein networks in vivo will be critical for realizing the promise of patient-tailored molecular therapy. Cancer can be defined as a dysregulation or hyperactivity in the network of intracellular and extracellular signaling cascades. These protein signaling circuits are the ultimate targets of molecular therapy. Each patient's tumor may be driven by a distinct series of molecular pathogenic defects. Thus, for any single molecular targeted therapy, only a subset of cancer patients may respond. Individualization of therapy, which tailors a therapeutic regimen to a tumor molecular portrait, may be the solution to this dilemma. Until recently, the field lacked the technology for molecular profiling at the genomic and proteomic level. Emerging proteomic technology, used concomitantly with genomic analysis, promises to meet this need and bring to reality the clinical adoption of molecular stratification. The activation state of kinase-driven signal networks contains important information relative to cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic target selection. Proteomic technology offers a means to quantify the state of kinase pathways, and provides post-translational phosphorylation data not obtainable by gene arrays. Case studies using clinical research specimens are provided to show the feasibility of generating the critical information needed to individualize therapy. Such technology can reveal potential new pathway interconnections, including differences between primary and metastatic lesions. We provide a vision for individualized combinatorial therapy based on proteomic mapping of phosphorylation end points in clinical tissue material.     

Anti-ischaemic effect of ivabradine.

Ivabradine, the first representative of a new class of exclusive heart rate-reducing agents, selectively inhibits the I(f) current in the sinoatrial node. The direct electrophysiological consequence of this inhibition is a reduction in the slope of the diastolic depolarisation curve and a decrease in heart rate. Pharmacological inhibition of the I(f) current with ivabradine has been shown to preserve coronary vasodilatation upon exercise, i.e., myocardial perfusion, with no negative inotropic effects and maintenance of cardiac contractility. Ivabradine protects the myocardium during ischaemia, improves left ventricular function in congestive heart failure, and reduces remodelling subsequent to myocardial infarction. Pure heart rate reduction by specific and selective I(f) inhibition decreases oxygen demand, improves myocardial energetics and improves perfusion of the ischaemic myocardium. We can expect distinct clinical benefits from long-term heart rate reduction in patients with chronic ischaemic disease.