Modified anthropometry in prepubertal Israeli children while excluding the head’s weight and height

Aim: A methodological inadequacy in anthropometric measurements of children exists because of an age‐dependent decelerating contribution of the head to body weight (Wt) and height (Ht). Hence, we aimed to assess the contribution of head measurements to anthropometry (Ht, Wt and BMI) in healthy prepubertal children. Methods: This prospective study was conducted in 300 2‐ to 9‐year‐old typically growing children. Head‐excluded (HE) Ht was determined by a stadiometer that measured the distance from the foot plate to the lower margin of protuberance occipitalis externa. Head’s weight was calculated from the head volume using three different measurements of the head circumference. Results: In the typically growing children, the HE/standard (STD) ratios for Wt and Ht increased significantly with age (p < 0.001 for both), but the HE/STD ratio for BMI did not increase with age. Conclusion: Measurement of body Wt and Ht while excluding the head’s Wt and Ht provides a new dimension to standard anthropometry by eliminating the age‐dependent head bias with its unique pattern of growth and minimal adipose tissue.     

Biological evaluation of intervertebral disc cells in different formulations of gellan gum‐based hydrogels

Gellan gum (GG)‐based hydrogels are advantageous in tissue engineering not only due to their ability to retain large quantities of water and provide a similar environment to that of natural extracellular matrix (ECM), but also because they can gelify in situ in seconds. Their mechanical properties can be fine‐tuned to mimic natural tissues such as the nucleus pulposus (NP). This study produced different formulations of GG hydrogels by mixing varying amounts of methacrylated (GG‐MA) and high‐acyl gellan gums (HA‐GG) for applications as acellular and cellular NP substitutes. The hydrogels were physicochemically characterized by dynamic mechanical analysis. Degradation and swelling abilities were assessed by soaking in a phosphate buffered saline solution for up to 170 h. Results showed that as HA‐GG content increased, the modulus of the hydrogels decreased. Moreover, increases in HA‐GG content induced greater weight loss in the GG‐MA/HA‐GG formulation compared to GG‐MA hydrogel. Potential cytotoxicity of the hydrogel was assessed by culturing rabbit NP cells up to 7 days. An MTS assay was performed by seeding rabbit NP cells onto the surface of 3D hydrogel disc formulations. Viability of rabbit NP cells encapsulated within the different hydrogel formulations was also evaluated by Calcein‐AM and ATP assays. Results showed that tunable GG‐MA/HA‐GG hydrogels were non‐cytotoxic and supported viability of rabbit NP cells. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effects of dexpanthenol with or without Aloe vera extract on radiation-induced oral mucositis: Preclinical studies

Purpose: To define the effect of dexpanthenol with or without Aloe vera extract on radiation-induced oral mucositis.

Materials and methods: Mouse tongue mucosal ulceration was analysed as the clinically relevant endpoint. Graded single or fractionated dose irradiation (10 x 3?Gy/2 weeks, graded test doses on day 14) were combined with topical administration of dexpanthenol or a base, with or without Aloe vera extract. The formulations were applied for 14 days (single dose) or 24 days after the first fraction.

Results: Single dose irradiation resulted in an ED₅₀ (dose at which a positive mucosal response was expected in 50% of the animals irradiated) of 11.9?±?1.2?Gy. None of the formulations yielded a significant change in incidence or time course of ulceration. Test irradiation after 10 x 3?Gy gave an ED₅₀ of 9.0?±?0.1?Gy. Base treatment increased the ED₅₀-values to 10.5?±?0.8?Gy (p?=?0.0095) and 9.9?±?0.7?Gy (p?=?0.0445) without or with Aloe vera. Dexpanthenol resulted in ED₅₀ values of 9.5?±?0.1?Gy without Aloe vera (p?>?0.05), and of 10.9?±?0.9?Gy (p?=?0.0035) with Aloe vera. The latent time to ulceration was prolonged, compared to the control (6.3 days) without Aloe vera (8.0?–?8.2 days, p?<?0.001) and with dexpanthenol and Aloe vera (7.3 days, p?=?0.0239).

Conclusions: With single dose irradiation, neither dexpanthenol nor Aloe vera extract significantly changed the oral mucosal radiation response. With fractionated irradiation, drug administration significantly increased the isoeffective radiation doses, independent of dexpanthenol or Aloe vera content. Neither dexpanthenol nor Aloe vera display a prophylactic potential.