Eosinophilic cholangitis coexisted with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: Report of a case

Eosinophilic cholangitis is a rare disease of which only 31 cases have been reported. Eosinophilic infiltration causes stricture of the bile duct diffusely or locally, and the imaging of eosinophilic cholangitis resembles primary sclerosing cholangitis or cancer of the bile tract. For eosinophilic cholangitis, treatment with steroid is effective and the prognosis is good. Therefore, its accurate diagnosis is very important. Here, we describe a patient with eosinophilic cholangitis who was also diagnosed with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). He was treated for ITP using prednisolone, the unexpected sudden interruption of which caused severe deterioration of eosinophilic cholangitis and acute cholecystitis. Cholecystectomy and choledochojejunostomy were performed, and the addition of treatment by prednisolone resulted in a good clinical course. This is the first report on eosinophilic cholangitis coexisting with ITP.     

Dual role of vascular endothelial growth factor in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a major angiogenic factor, mediates a variety of disease conditions through promotion of angiogenesis. It also plays a critical role as a potent proinflammatory cytokine in a variety of physiologic and pathologic immune responses. In the present study, we evaluated the expression of VEGF in hepatic warm ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and examined the effect of recombinant human (rh)VEGF administration in an established murine model. METHOD: The expression of VEGF in the liver was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry during I/R injury using 70% partial hepatic ischemia model. The effect of rhVEGF administration on I/R injury was evaluated by measuring liver function and histology. In addition, local inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and endothelial NO synthase expressions were examined to address the underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: The local expression of VEGF was significantly up-regulated at 2 hours after reperfusion after 60 minutes of ischemia compared with that in the naive liver. VEGF was expressed predominantly in CD11b+ cells infiltrating into the ischemic liver. The administration of rhVEGF had a significant protective effect on ischemic injury in the liver. This effect was associated with the up-regulation of iNOS expression in the rhVEGF-treated liver. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate a dual role of VEGF in hepatic warm I/R injury. Although endogenous VEGF is expressed and functional to initiate hepatic I/R injury, exogenous rhVEGF has a beneficial effect on the ischemic liver. These data may provide new insights into the role of VEGF as well as pathophysiology of hepatic I/R injury.     

Two cases of methicillin-resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Staphylococcus aureus</Emphasis> keratitis after Epi-LASIK

Background  We describe two severe cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis following Epi-LASIK surgery. Cases  One patient was a 23-year-old man who underwent Epi-LASIK surgery in both eyes. He developed an infectious corneal ulcer in one eye 2 days after surgery and was referred to us 7 days post-surgery with corneal perforation, for which we performed therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. The other patient was a 32-year-old man who developed infectious keratitis in one eye 4 days after bilateral Epi-LASIK and was referred to us 2 days later. Observations  Microbial testing revealed MRSA infection as the cause of the keratitis in both patients which was successfully treated with vancomycin eyedrops. Conclusion  Infectious keratitis after refractive surgery is uncommon; it is important to diagnose this condition, identify the causative agent, and initiate treatment with appropriate antibiotics as soon as possible.     

Active specific immunotherapy with antiidiotypic antibodies in patients with solid tumors

Tumor-associated antigens (TAA) provide appropriate targets for selective manipulation of the patient's immune response in the immunotherapy of cancer. Active specific immunotherapy utilizing antiidiotypic antibodies to anti-TAA antibodies has been implemented in phase I clinical trials both in patients with colorectal carcinoma and in those with melanoma. The theoretical basis for immunotherapy with antiidiotypic antibodies, the results of these clinical trials, and an evaluation of appropriate parameters for future clinical trials of active specific immunotherapy with antiidiotypic antibodies in patients with solid tumors are reviewed.     

Splenectomy in Felty's syndrome

The syndrome of rheumatoid arthritis, splenomegaly, leukopenia, and neutropenia is rare. When it occurs, it could become complicated by infection that does not respond to antibiotics and steroid therapy. We feel that splenectomy should be carried out once the diagnosis of Felty's syndrome is made. In the presence of infection, prompt splenectomy should be done, even if the patient shows signs of systemic toxicity. Splenectomy is the most beneficial treatment and may prevent a fatal outcome in these cases. Splenectomy is usually followed by immediate hematologic response. Steroid therapy may alter the arthritic symptoms but has no effect in altering or controlling the infection in these cases, even if accompanied by antibiotic therapy. Radiation of the spleen may reduce its size, but does not prevent or control the infections in patients with Felty's syndrome.     

Role of the ICOS-B7h costimulatory pathway in the pathophysiology of chronic allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Inducible costimulator (ICOS) is the third member of the CD28 superfamily and has a unique role in T cell activation and function. Recent studies indicated that the ICOS-B7h pathway plays an important role in alloimmune responses. We further investigated the role of the ICOS pathway in the pathologic process of chronic rejection in vivo. METHODS: An established major histocompatibility complex class II disparate cardiac transplantation model was used. We treated mice with a blocking anti-B7h monoclonal antibody (mAb) either in the initiation phase (early blockade) or in the progression phase (delayed blockade) of disease. In addition, some mice received mAb in the entire period (whole blockade). At 6 weeks after transplantation, cardiac grafts were evaluated by histopathologic analysis in terms of vasculopathy, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration. The intragraft expressions of cytokines and chemokines were also examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. RESULTS: Early blockade of the ICOS-B7h pathway did not show any protective effect on chronic allograft rejection compared with untreated controls. In contrast, delayed blockade significantly inhibited the development of vasculopathy, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration (P=0.043, P=0.004, and P=0.03 vs. untreated control, respectively). Interestingly, whole blockade did not prevent the chronic rejection process. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of delayed ICOS blockade on chronic rejection was associated with down-regulation of local intragraft expression of several cytokines and chemokines. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the ICOS-B7h pathway is critical in the activation of effector/memory T cells that are necessary for the progression of chronic rejection and provide the rationale to develop novel and specific therapies to prevent this process.     

Function of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors Flt-1 and Flk-1/KDR in the alloimmune response in vivo

BACKGROUND: We have recently reported that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) functions as a proinflammatory cytokine to regulate the trafficking of leukocytes into allografts in the early posttransplant period. VEGF binds two major VEGF receptors: VEGFR-1 (flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (flk-1/KDR). Here, we wished to investigate the expression and function of VEGF receptors in the process of acute allograft rejection in vivo. METHODS: We performed fully MHC-mismatched C57BL/6 (H-2b) into BALB/c (H-2d) vascularized heterotopic murine cardiac transplants and we examined the expression of VEGF and VEGF receptors by immunohistochemistry during acute allograft rejection. Next, we treated mice with specific neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against murine VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 and examined their effect on the development of acute allograft rejection by histology and by analysis of graft survival. The intragraft expression of cytokines and chemokines were also evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. RESULTS: The expression of VEGF, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 were significantly up-regulated during allograft rejection as compared to isografts. Administration of either anti-VEGFR-1 or anti-VEGFR-2 alone failed to inhibit allograft rejection. However, coadministration of both antibodies together inhibited leukocyte infiltration of allografts and prolonged allograft survival. Furthermore, the effect of VEGFR blockade was associated with the downregulation of intragraft cytokine and chemokine expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that VEGF-VEGFR interactions function in the alloimmune response in vivo. Targeting VEGFRs may represent a novel therapy to protect allografts following clinical transplantation.     

Combination chemotherapy containing semustine (MeCCNU) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu)

Two hundred thirty-two patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer previously treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) were randomized to one of the following treatments: A) semustine (MeCCNU) plus vincristine (VCR); B) MeCCNU plus dacarbazine (DTIC); C) MeCCNU plus DTIC plus VCR; D) MeCCNU plus beta-2'-deoxythioguanosine (beta-TGdR). Platelet nadirs less than 50,000/mm3 were noted in 9% (Treatment A) to 19% (D) of the patients while WBC nadirs less than 2,000/mm3 were noted in 7% (B) to 12% (C,D) of the patients. Severe vomiting was noted in 2% (D) to 14% (B) of the patients. The partial response rates and median survival times from date of randomization were as follows: Treatment A: 3/54 (6%), 19 weeks; B: 9/59 (16%), 28 weeks; C: 3/60 (5%), 25 weeks; D: 2/59 (4%), 19 weeks. Differences in response rate and median survival are not statistically significant.