Application of perineometer in the assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance: a reliability study

Despite different studies on the reliability of pelvic floor muscle assessment, there is still no general consensus on the most valid and reliable method. The purpose of this study was to investigate the intra-rater (within-day and between-days) reliability of perineometer in the assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance. Following ethical approval, 15 healthy women aged from 22 to 50-years old, with no history of low back pain were recruited. The Peritron perineometer instrument was used to measure pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance. Two measurements were taken on the same day with an hour interval to assess within-day reliability and the third measurement was taken five days later to determine between-days reliability. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) and the level of agreement between measurements were used for data analysis. The high ICC values (0.95 for strength and 0.94 for endurance) and high level of agreement between measurements indicated high within-day reliability for pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance. The perineometer was also shown to be reliable for between-days measurements with high ICC (0.88 for strength and 0.83 for endurance) and high level of agreement between measurements. The results demonstrated that the perineometer appears to be a highly reliable method of measuring pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance when measurements are taken in healthy subject by the same investigator.     

Comparing the results of Pap smear and Direct Visual Inspection (DVI) with 5% acetic acid in cervical cancer screening

Background:

Cervical cancer is the most second common cancer among Iranian women. This study was carried out to compare the results of Pap smear method and Direct Visual Inspection (DVI) with 5% acetic acid in cervical cancer screening in Tabriz, Iran.

Material and Methods:

This cross-sectional study was carried out in Alzahra Therapeutic-Educational Centre, Tabriz, Iran in 2013 on 1000 women. First, Pap smear was done for all women, and then the cervix exposed with 5% acetic acid by cotton swab for 30 seconds and observed under adequate light. At the end, women with abnormal results in Pap smear or DVI method were referred to colposcopy and biopsy. Test''s sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), LR+, LR- and confidence interval (CI) were determined (P < 0.05).

Results:

Nine-hundred and seventy-four (94.7%) cases were normal and had no abnormal findings and 26 (2.6%) participants had positive results in Pap smear or DVI test. Twelve women had abnormal Pap smear (nine women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, ASCUS, three women with dysplasia, atypical endocervical, and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, LSIL results) and 14 women had positive DVI (four women with human papillomavirus, HPV or koilocyte,) and one women with abnormality in both method had carcinoma in biopsy that referred to oncologist. In this study the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for DVI were 71.4%, 50%, 35.7%, and 81.8% respectively in comparison with 14.3%, 50%, 10%, and 60% for Pap smear.

Conclusion:

As the DVI method has higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than Pap smear, it could be used as a useful method beside the Pap smear.