Characterization and quantitation of the circulating forms of serum transferrin receptor using domain-specific antibodies

To characterize the nature of the immunoreactive transferrin receptor in human serum, antisera were developed to peptide sequences of the extracellular domain of human transferrin receptor between amino acids 107 and 120 and the intracellular domain between amino acids 40 and 54. Antisera against the extracellular domain exhibited reactivity against both purified intact receptor and immunopurified circulating receptor, whereas antisera against the intracellular domain reacted only with intact receptor. Using competitive binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, transferrin receptor in ultracentrifuged sera from normal subjects and patients with sickle cell anemia could be detected with antisera against the extracellular but not the intracellular domain. When the pellet obtained by ultracentrifugation of these sera was assayed after solubilization in 1% teric (polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether), only 0.6% of total serum receptor was detected in normal subjects and 3.8% in subjects with sickle cell disease. Roughly equal amounts of this pelleted immunoactivity were detected with antibodies against the extracellular and intracellular domains. These results indicate that less than 1% of transferrin receptor in normal human sera is intact receptor consistent with an exosomal origin and that virtually all circulating transferrin receptor is in the form of a truncated extracellular domain.     

Rationing Limited Healthcare Resources in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond: Ethical Considerations Regarding Older Adults

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to impact older adults disproportionately with respect to serious consequences ranging from severe illness and hospitalization to increased mortality risk. Concurrently, concerns about potential shortages of healthcare professionals and health supplies to address these issues have focused attention on how these resources are ultimately allocated and used. Some strategies, for example, misguidedly use age as an arbitrary criterion that disfavors older adults in resource allocation decisions. This is a companion article to the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) position statement, “Resource Allocation Strategies and Age-Related Considerations in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.” It is intended to inform stakeholders including hospitals, health systems, and policymakers about ethical considerations that should be considered when developing strategies for allocation of scarce resources during an emergency involving older adults. This review presents the legal and ethical background for the position statement and discusses these issues that informed the development of the AGS positions: (1) age as a determining factor, (2) age as a tiebreaker, (3) criteria with a differential impact on older adults, (4) individual choices and advance directives, (5) racial/ethnic disparities and resource allocation, and (6) scoring systems and their impact on older adults. It also considers the role of advance directives as expressions of individual preferences in pandemics. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1143–1149, 2020.