体外膜肺氧合技术支持治疗期间患者血乳酸浓度及其预后

目的:探讨体外膜肺氧合支持治疗患者血乳酸浓度的变化和预后。方法:于2004-12/2006-09在中国医学科学院阜外心血管病医院因脱离体外循环困难的心脏外科术后患者、扩张性心肌病和冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病发生心源性休克的患者共40例进行了体外膜肺氧合支持治疗,按年龄和存活预后分为4组:成人存活组、成人死亡组、儿童存活组、儿童死亡组。分析4组的治疗效果,分别抽取各组患者体外膜肺氧合建立时、体外膜肺氧合运转6h、运转中间时点、停机前6h、停机时的血乳酸浓度。结果:①体外膜肺氧合支持治疗患者40例,成人组26例,20例脱机,16例生存,10例死亡,脱机率76.9%,生存率61.5%;儿童组14例,7例脱机,5例生存,9例死亡,脱机率50.0%,生存率35.0%。②成人或儿童存活组的乳酸浓度都与死亡组有明显差别,存活组血乳酸浓度明显低于死亡组,其中建立和运转6h、中间时点的差异有显著性意义(P<0.05),其余2个时点的差异有非常显著性意义(P<0.001)。组内与建立时比较,中间时点、停止前6h、停止时差异均有显著性意义(P<0.001),血乳酸浓度逐渐降低。结论:经体外膜肺氧合支持治疗的患者,血乳酸浓度明显下降,脱机时血乳酸仍高的患者预后不良。     

Donor screening for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and hepatitis B virus infection in transfusion recipients

BACKGROUND: Testing for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) as a surrogate for hepatitis C viremia is no longer needed for blood donor screening. Currently, the important question is how much its use supplements hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) donor screening in preventing transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a study conducted in the 1970s, 64 blood donors were associated with 15 cases of HBV (1.0%) in 1533 transfusion recipients. Sera from 61 donors at donation and 29 follow-up visits were available for present-day assays for HBsAg, HBV DNA, anti-HBc, and antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). RESULTS: HBsAg was found in four previously negative blood donors; HBV DNA was limited to three of these four. Anti-HBc was detected in six HBsAg-negative donors. Two other donors were negative in all assays at donation, but positive for anti- HBc and anti-HBs 2 to 4 months later. The remaining donors were negative for all HBV markers, which left five recipient cases unexplained. No HBV transmission was observed when anti-HBs sample-to- negative control values were > or = 10. CONCLUSION: Some 33 to 50 percent of cases of hepatitis B that could be transmitted by transfusion of blood from HBsAg-negative donors are prevented by anti- HBc screening. Anti-HBc-positive donors unequivocally positive for anti- HBs should be considered noninfectious for HBV and should be allowed to donate. Anti-HBc screening of paid plasmapheresis donors, supplemented by anti-HBs testing, would reduce the amount of HBV to be processed by virus inactivation and increase the content of anti-HBs in plasma pools.     

Carrier-directed anti-hapten responses by b-cell subsets

The capacity of the trinitrophenyl (TNP) haptenic group, coupled to a series of chemically dissimilar carriers, to cross-stimulate putative T- dependent and T-independent murine B-cell subpepulations was determined by using an in vitro limiting dilution technique to generate primary IgM responses. It was found that TNP-Ficoll and TNP-dextran, two T- independent antigens with little or no polyclonal mitogenicity, stimulate the same population of anti-TNP precursors, which is distinct from the precursor population activated by TNP-bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a T-independent polyclonal mitogen, or TNP-horse erythrocytes (HRBC), a T-dependent antigen. On the other hand, TNP-LPS and TNP-HRBC activate the same precursor population, indicating that LPS can substitute for the T- cell signal in T-dependent B-cell responses, whereas nonmitogenic T- independent antigens cannot. However, the cumulative evidence from this and other laboratories strongly indicates that LPS and T-dependent antigens activate B cells by different mechanisms. Of particular interest, LPS is incapable of activating B cells responsive to weakly- or nonmitogenic T-independent antigens. Based on clonal burst size, T-dependent antigens are capable of inducing greater antigen-specific B-cell proliferation than T-independent antigens. However, TNP conjugates of Ficoll and dextran, which are relatively poor inducers of polyclonal B-cell activation, induced larger anti-TNP clones than did TNP-LPS, a strong polyclonal mitogen. The findings reinforce the evidence favoring existence of multiple B- cell subpopulations with distinctive activation pathways. They also strengthen the proposition that a given B-cell subset can be activated by more than one mechanism.     

Adverse reactions in blood donors with a history of seizures or epilepsy

BACKGROUND: Individuals with epilepsy or seizure disorders are restricted from donating blood because of concern that they are prone to adverse donor reactions such as syncope and convulsions. A study evaluating whether that concern is warranted is reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: During a 2-year period beginning in 1987, blood donors in Maryland with a history of seizures were actively recruited by the American Red Cross. Adverse donor reactions were classified as "slight", indicating dizziness and nausea without loss of consciousness; "moderate," denoting syncope; and "severe," indicating convulsive syncope. RESULTS: There were 329,143 satisfactory blood donations; 613 individuals reporting a history of seizures donated blood a total of 723 times. Among donors with seizures, 186 (35.7%) were taking antiepileptic medication, and 61 (8.4%) had had one or more seizures in the preceding year. Individuals with seizures had a low incidence of adverse reactions (3.34%). Although this incidence was slightly higher than that in the entire population (2.24%), the difference was not significant. In particular, the risk of syncope with or without convulsive activity was low for people with seizures (0.21%) and not significantly greater than that in other donors (0.28%). CONCLUSION: Individuals with seizures or epilepsy are not at greater risk for adverse reactions after blood donation, and major restrictions on their participation as blood donors are not warranted.     

The use of a recombinant immunoblot assay in the interpretation of anti- hepatitis C virus reactivity among prospectively followed patients, implicated donors, and random donors

Samples from prospectively followed recipients, their respective donors, and a cohort of random donors were used to evaluate the specificity and efficacy of a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) as an adjunct to anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). RIBA reacted (RIBA+) in 100 percent of patients who developed hepatitis associated with anti-HCV seroconversion documented by EIA and in 100 percent of the EIA-positive (EIA+) donors implicated in these cases. In contrast, RIBA reacted in none of 10 recipients who were EIA+ but did not develop hepatitis, in none of 7 EIA+ patients with hepatitis B or cytomegalovirus infection, in 33 percent of EIA+ donors who were not implicated in hepatitis transmission, and in 37 percent of EIA+ random donors. Hence, the vast majority of EIA+ individuals who have ancillary evidence of HCV infection react on RIBA, whereas the majority of EIA+ individuals in low-risk settings do not react (RIBA-negative, or RIBA-). There was a strong association between RIBA reactivity and the presence of a surrogate marker (elevated alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and/or antibody to hepatitis B core antigen); 43 percent of RIBA+ implicated donors had a surrogate marker as compared to none of 14 EIA+, RIBA- donors. Among EIA+ random donors, 77 percent of those with a surrogate marker were RIBA+, as compared with 29 percent of those without a surrogate marker. In addition, in EIA+ donors, RIBA reactivity correlated with the extent of ALT elevation; 86 percent of those with an ALT greater than 135 IU per L were RIBA+ compared with 18 percent of those with an ALT less than 30 IU per L.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A search for hepatitis C virus polymerase chain reaction-positive but seronegative subjects among blood donors with elevated alanine aminotransferase

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported the existence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive but seronegative sera. This is not surprising in the case of window-phase specimens, because PCR can detect HCV RNA many weeks before the appearance of antibody. To determine whether such sera can also be found in chronically infected subjects, a high-risk population of blood donors with elevated alanine aminotransferase was studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Freshly frozen plasma from 301 donors with alanine aminotransferase > 100 IU per L was tested with PCR assays that were rigidly controlled for specificity and contamination, and with current and newer versions of assays for anti-HCV. Sera were classified as seropositive if positive in two screening assays and one supplemental assay or if positive in two screening assays and PCR. RESULTS: New versions of screening assays detected 100 percent of seropositive samples. A second-generation immunoblot assay detected 98 percent of seropositive sera, a second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay detected 96 percent, and an enzyme immunoassay for antibody to the envelope protein of HCV detected 98 percent. Fifty-one of 54 seropositive sera were PCR positive. None of the 247 seronegative samples was reproducibly positive on PCR. CONCLUSION: No PCR-positive but seronegative donors were found in this high-risk donor population. The possible benefit of PCR screening of blood donors can be determined only by large-scale comparative testing of donor populations and may be limited to the detection of window-phase infections.     

Characteristics of a donor population in western Venezuela

To determine the characteristics of blood donors in western Venezuela, we collected data from 1983 to 1985 on 31,320 volunteer donors at the Blood Bank of the State of Zulia in Maracaibo. Fifty-nine percent of the donors were blood group O, 30 percent were group A, 9 percent were group B, and 2 percent were group AB. Most of the donors (93%) were Rh positive. One percent of donors had positive reactions to hepatitis B surface antigen, 3.15 percent for syphilis, 1.43 percent for antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi, and 0.32 percent to human immunodeficiency virus antibodies. About one-half of the donors were between 18 and 30 years old, and only 10 percent were women. To determine if iron deficiency anemia was a cause for the small size of the female donor pool, we measured serum ferritin in 50 first-time female donors. Ten of these (20%) had serum ferritin values below normal, and the distribution of serum ferritin levels of all 50 was very similar to that reported for frequent donors in Europe and the United States, with a clustering of ferritin values between 10 and 70 ng per ml. The data indicate that blood donors in western Venezuela are markedly different from those in the United States and that iron supplementation may be indicated for female Venezuelan donors.     

鸡胚胎素对小鼠红细胞数量及免疫器官质量的影响

目的:建立血虚和免疫抑制动物模型,观察鸡胚胎低温提取物对其红细胞造血以及免疫器官质量的影响。方法:实验于2001-04/2002-09在新乡医学院药物研究室完成。①实验材料:健康昆明种小鼠50只,雌雄各半。鸡胚胎素[中国发明专利公开(公告)号:CN1748713],符合研究者申报专利时提出的质量检验标准。②鸡胚胎素对血虚模型小鼠红细胞数值及血红蛋白含量的影响:取20只小鼠,随机排列表法分为鸡胚胎素组、模型对照组,10只/组,建立失血性血虚动物模型。失血后24h当红细胞数<3.2×1012L-1、血红蛋白含量<84g/L,且小鼠外观出现皮色苍白、食欲不振等现象时,代表造模成功。次日,鸡胚胎素组给予鸡胚胎素5g/(kg·d)灌胃,模型对照组给予生理盐水20mL/(kg·d)灌胃,连续14d。分别于失血前、失血后24h、末次给鸡胚胎素后2h尾部采血测定两组红细胞数量及血红蛋白含量的变化。③鸡胚胎素对免疫抑制模型小鼠免疫器官质量的影响:取30只小鼠,随机排列表法分为鸡胚胎素组、模型对照组、正常对照组,10只/组。鸡胚胎素组给予鸡胚胎素5g/(kg·d)灌胃,模型对照组和正常对照组均灌服等量生理盐水,连续14d。在第11天上午鸡胚胎素灌胃2h后,鸡胚胎素组、模型对照组腹腔注射环磷酰胺60mg/(kg·d),连续4d,复制免疫抑制动物模型。末次给予环磷酰胺2h后颈椎脱位法处死小鼠,计算胸腺、脾脏质量指数。结果:50只小鼠均进入结果分析。①失血前及失血后24h鸡胚胎素组与模型对照组的红细胞数值、血红蛋白含量基本相似(P>0.05)。末次给鸡胚胎素后2h与模型对照组比较,鸡胚胎素组红细胞数值、血红蛋白含量均明显升高(t=3.39,P<0.01;t=2.52,P<0.05)。②末次给环磷酰胺2h后与模型对照组比较,鸡胚胎素组、正常对照组的胸腺质量指数和脾脏质量指数均明显升高(t=6.62,P<0.01;t=2.47,P<0.05)。结论:鸡胚胎素灌胃对血虚小鼠具有较好的促红细胞造血功能,同时对环磷酰胺造成的免疫器官质量下降具有明显的增重作用。     

Donor levels of serum alanine aminotransferase activity and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen associated with recipient hepatitis C and non- B, non-C outcomes

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis virus(es) that are neither hepatitis B (HBV) nor hepatitis C (HCV) (non-B, non-C [NBNC]) may be transmitted by transfusion. The present study assessed donor values for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti- HBc) for their association with HCV and NBNC hepatitis outcomes among allogeneic blood recipients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on blood donors and recipients enrolled in the Transfusion- Transmitted Viruses Study in four United States cities from 1974 through 1980 were supplemented by anti-HBc testing of donors and anti-HCV evaluation of recipients. Two statistical approaches estimated the value of these indirect tests in detecting donors associated with HCV seroconversion and NBNC hepatitis in recipients. RESULTS: For HCV cases, donor ALT alone (at > or = 60 IU/L) had a sensitivity and a specificity of 30 and 96 percent, respectively, and anti-HBc alone (at > or = 60% inhibition) had a sensitivity and specificity of 53 and 86 percent, respectively. The two markers combined had a sensitivity and a specificity of 69 and 83 percent. For NBNC hepatitis cases, each measure had low sensitivity (20%) that was not improved by using both (28%) [corrected]. CONCLUSION: The indirect tests proved to be equal in sensitivity to the first-generation anti-HCV tests. The positive predictive power of these indirect tests in the 1980s was sufficient to affect HCV incidence in studies during that period. Improved anti-HCV assays, however, replaced the need for indirect tests. The sensitivity of indirect tests for NBNC hepatitis contributed little.