Physician knowledge of herbal toxicities and adverse herb-drug interactions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how knowledgeable physicians are regarding the toxic effects and drug interactions of herbal remedies. METHODS: An anonymous voluntary demographic survey and 16-question, multiple-choice quiz was distributed at educational meetings of emergency medicine and internal medicine physicians. The primary outcome measures were to determine whether significant associations existed between quiz scores and the amount of clinical experience, or between quiz scores and self-assessed familiarity with the topic of herbal toxicities and adverse herb-drug interactions. RESULTS: A total of 142 surveys and quizzes were completed by 59 attending physicians, 57 resident physicians, and 26 medical students. The mean subject score on the quiz was only slightly higher than would have occurred from random guessing. Neither the amount of the subjects' clinical experience, nor their self-assessed familiarity with herbal toxicities and drug interactions correlated significantly with the score on the quiz. CONCLUSION: The physicians and medical students surveyed had little training in herbal toxicities and drug interactions. They generally rated their familiarity with these topics as 'poor', and their scores on the quiz bore out this assessment as correct. Educational efforts might improve physician knowledge of the adverse effects of herbal remedies.     

Emergency Medicine Practitioner Knowledge and Use of Decision Rules for the Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Variations by Practice Setting and Training Level

Background Several clinical decision rules (CDRs) have been validated for pretest probability assessment of pulmonary embolism (PE), but the authors are unaware of any data quantifying and characterizing their use in emergency departments. Objectives To characterize clinicians' knowledge of and attitudes toward two commonly used CDRs for PE. Methods By using a modified Delphi approach, the authors developed a two‐page paper survey including 15 multiple‐choice questions. The questions were designed to determine the respondents' familiarity, frequency of use, and comprehension of the Canadian and Charlotte rules. The survey also queried the frequency of use of unstructured (gestalt) pretest probability assessment and reasons why physicians choose not to use decision rules. The surveys were sent to physicians, physician assistants, and medical students at 32 academic and community hospitals in the United States and the United Kingdom. Results Respondents included 555 clinicians; 443 (80%) work in academic practice, and 112 (20%) are community based. Significantly more academic practitioners (73%) than community practitioners (49%) indicated familiarity with at least one of the two decision rules. Among all respondents familiar with a rule, 50% reported using it in more than half of applicable cases. A significant number of these respondents could not correctly identify a key component of the rule (23% for the Charlotte rule and 43% for the Canadian rule). Fifty‐seven percent of all respondents indicated use of gestalt rather than a decision rule in more than half of cases. Conclusions Academic clinicians were more likely to report familiarity with either of these two specific decision rules. Only one half of all clinicians reporting familiarity with the rules use them in more than 50% of applicable cases. Spontaneous recall of the specific elements of the rules was low to moderate. Future work should consider clinical gestalt in the evaluation of patients with possible PE.     

Decrements in vigilance and cognitive functioning associated with ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The adverse effects of untreated seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR) on performance in the workplace, school, and home are poorly understood. To delineate more clearly the impact and consequences of the disease on performance, the effect of symptomatic AR on vigilance and a wide range of cognitive functions was investigated. METHODS: A battery of automated neuropsychological tests was administered to asymptomatic adult subjects with histories of AR. Subjects were randomized to either a symptomatic or to an asymptomatic group. Subjects in the symptomatic group were exposed to ragweed pollen in a controlled exposure setting until they demonstrated predetermined severities of AR symptoms. Subjects in the asymptomatic group were not exposed to ragweed pollen in the environmental unit and retained a minimum symptom profile. The battery of cognitive measures was re-administered to both groups. RESULTS: AR had major adverse impacts on measures of vigilance. Further, AR adversely affected a broad range of cognitive functions. Specifically, subjects with AR symptoms demonstrated longer response times and decreased efficiency on measures of working memory, psychomotor speed, reasoning/computation, and divided attention as compared with asymptomatic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to decreased vigilance, AR was associated with decrements in speed and efficiency across several cognitive domains. This is similar to findings in research on medications and medical conditions that cause sedation. Findings may represent a link between AR and poor productivity/personal safety among AR sufferers. This suggests that these results have implications with regard to public health.     

Eliminating Intensive Postoperative Care in Same-day Surgery Patients Using Short-acting Anesthetics

Background: A multidisciplinary effort was undertaken to determine whether patients could safely bypass the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) after same-day surgery by moving to an earlier time point evaluation of recovery criteria.

Methods: A prospective, outcomes research study with a baseline month, an intervention month, and a follow-up month was designed. Five surgical centers (three community-based hospitals and two freestanding ambulatory surgical centers) were utilized. Two thousand five hundred eight patients were involved in the baseline period, and 2,354 were involved in the follow-up period. Outcome measures included PACU bypass rates and adverse events. Intervention consisted of a multidisciplinary educational program and routine feedback reports.

Results: The overall PACU bypass rate (58%) was significantly different from baseline (15.9%, P < 0.001), for patients to whom a general anesthetic was administered (0.4-31.8%, P < 0.001), and for those given other anesthetic techniques (monitored anesthesia care, regional or local anesthetics; 29.1-84.2%, P < 0.001). During the follow-up period, the average (SD) recovery duration for patients who bypassed the PACU was significantly shorter compared to that for patients who did not bypass, 84.6 (61.5) versus 175.1 (98.8) min, P < 0.001, with no change in patient outcome. Patients receiving only short-acting anesthetics were 78% more likely (P < 0.002) to bypass the PACU after adjusting for various surgical procedures.     

Eligible Veterans'' Choice Between VA-covered and Non-VA-covered Dental Care

Veterans who were eligible for dental care in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities at no monetary cost responded to a mailed questionnaire. Seventy-one percent were aware that they were actually eligible for VA dental care. However, only 48 percent reported the VA as their only or primary source of dental care. Eligibility status, perceived quality of VA dental care, use of VA medical care, perception that one's income meets expenses, and perceived need for dental care were significant correlates of using the VA as one's current source of dental care. Level of formal education, perception that one's income meets expenses, transportation pattern, geographic distance from a VA facility, and eligibility status were significant correlates of using the VA as one's current medical care source. Research on VA utilization offers the opportunity to study issues of access to, and use of, a large public health care system whose patients largely receive care at no monetary cost. Veterans' use of VA dental and medical care is apparently influenced by a wide variety of factors, ranging from barriers to access to non-VA systems, to characteristics of the VA delivery system itself, to need for treatment.