High prevalence of hepatic steatosis and vascular thrombosis in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of autopsy data

BACKGROUNDCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease can frequently affect the liver. Data on hepatic histopathological findings in COVID-19 is scarce.AIMTo characterize hepatic pathological findings in patients with COVID-19.METHODSWe conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020192813), following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible trials were those including patients of any age and COVID-19 diagnosis based on a molecular test. Histopathological reports from deceased COVID-19 patients undergoing autopsy or liver biopsy were reviewed. Articles including less than ten patients were excluded. Proportions were pooled using random-effects models. Q statistic and I² were used to assess heterogeneity and levels of evidence, respectively.RESULTSWe identified 18 studies from 7 countries; all were case reports and case series from autopsies. All the patients were over 15 years old, and 67.2% were male. We performed a meta-analysis of 5 studies, including 116 patients. Pooled prevalence estimates of liver histopathological findings were hepatic steatosis 55.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 46.2-63.8], congestion of hepatic sinuses 34.7% (95%CI: 7.9-68.4), vascular thrombosis 29.4% (95%CI: 0.4-87.2), fibrosis 20.5% (95%CI: 0.6-57.9), Kupffer cell hyperplasia 13.5% (95%CI: 0.6-54.3), portal inflammation 13.2% (95%CI: 0.1-48.8), and lobular inflammation 11.6% (95%CI: 0.3-35.7). We also identified the presence of venous outflow obstruction, phlebosclerosis of the portal vein, herniated portal vein, periportal abnormal vessels, hemophagocytosis, and necrosis.CONCLUSIONWe found a high prevalence of hepatic steatosis and vascular thrombosis as major histological liver features. Other frequent findings included portal and lobular inflammation and Kupffer cell hyperplasia or proliferation. Further studies are needed to establish the mechanisms and implications of these findings.     

Design,Development, and Evaluation of a Novel Microneedle Array-based Continuous Glucose Monitor

The development of accurate, minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices has been the subject of much work by several groups, as it is believed that a less invasive and more user-friendly device will result in greater adoption of CGM by persons with insulin-dependent diabetes. This article presents the results of preliminary clinical studies in subjects with diabetes of a novel prototype microneedle-based continuous glucose monitor. In this device, an array of tiny hollow microneedles is applied into the epidermis from where glucose in interstitial fluid (ISF) is transported via passive diffusion to an amperometric glucose sensor external to the body. Comparison of 1396 paired device glucose measurements and fingerstick blood glucose readings for up to 72-hour wear in 10 diabetic subjects shows the device to be accurate and well tolerated by the subjects. Overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) is 15% with 98.4% of paired points in the A+B region of the Clarke error grid. The prototype device has demonstrated clinically accurate glucose readings over 72 hours, the first time a microneedle-based device has achieved such performance.     

A Study of Patient Experience Using a Blood Glucose Meter With an In-Built Insulin Dose Calculator

Background:Accurate calculation and adjustment of insulin doses is integral to maintaining glycemic control in insulin treated patients. Difficulties with insulin dose calculations may lead to poor adherence to blood glucose monitoring and insulin treatment regimes, resulting in poor metabolic control. The main objective of this study was to evaluate ease of use and user preference of a high specification touch screen blood glucose meter, which has an in-built insulin calculator, compared to patients’ usual method of testing blood glucose and deciding insulin doses.Methods:Patients with diabetes on a multiple daily injection insulin regime used the Test Meter without the insulin calculator and 1 of 3 comparator meters, each for a 7-day period. They then used the Test Meter with the in-built calculator for 10 days. Patients completed an ease of use questionnaire after each 7-day period, a preference questionnaire after the second 7-day period, and a questionnaire comparing the Test Meter with their usual method after the final 10-day period.Results:Of 164 patients who completed the study, 76% stated a preference for the Test Meter as a diabetes management tool compared to their usual method. A small number of patients preferred familiar methods and/or calculating insulin doses themselves. The log book function of meters was important to most patients.Conclusions:The Test Meter system with in-built insulin calculator supports people to better manage their diabetes and increases their confidence. Patients have different needs and preferences which should be acknowledged and supported in a patient centered health service.     

Comprehensive Biomarker Testing of Glycemia,Insulin Resistance,and Beta Cell Function Has Greater Sensitivity to Detect Diabetes Risk Than Fasting Glucose and HbA1c and Is Associated with Improved Glycemic Control in Clinical Practice

Blood-based biomarker testing of insulin resistance (IR) and beta cell dysfunction may identify diabetes risk earlier than current glycemia-based approaches. This retrospective cohort study assessed 1,687 US patients at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) under routine clinical care with a comprehensive panel of 19 biomarkers and derived factors related to IR, beta cell function, and glycemic control. The mean age was 53?±?15, 42 % were male, and 25 % had glycemic indicators consistent with prediabetes. An additional 45 % of the patients who had normal glycemic indicators were identified with IR or beta cell abnormalities. After 5.3 months of median follow-up, significantly more patients had improved than worsened their glycemic status in the prediabetic category (35 vs. 9 %; P?HbA1c values of 5.5–5.6; 56 vs. 18 %, p?相似文献   

Regulation of photosystem I light harvesting by zeaxanthin

In oxygenic photosynthetic eukaryotes, the hydroxylated carotenoid zeaxanthin is produced from preexisting violaxanthin upon exposure to excess light conditions. Zeaxanthin binding to components of the photosystem II (PSII) antenna system has been investigated thoroughly and shown to help in the dissipation of excess chlorophyll-excited states and scavenging of oxygen radicals. However, the functional consequences of the accumulation of the light-harvesting complex I (LHCI) proteins in the photosystem I (PSI) antenna have remained unclarified so far. In this work we investigated the effect of zeaxanthin binding on photoprotection of PSI–LHCI by comparing preparations isolated from wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (i.e., with violaxanthin) and those isolated from the A. thaliana nonphotochemical quenching 2 mutant, in which violaxanthin is replaced by zeaxanthin. Time-resolved fluorescence measurements showed that zeaxanthin binding leads to a previously unrecognized quenching effect on PSI–LHCI fluorescence. The efficiency of energy transfer from the LHCI moiety of the complex to the PSI reaction center was down-regulated, and an enhanced PSI resistance to photoinhibition was observed both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, zeaxanthin was shown to be effective in inducing dissipative states in PSI, similar to its well-known effect on PSII. We propose that, upon acclimation to high light, PSI–LHCI changes its light-harvesting efficiency by a zeaxanthin-dependent quenching of the absorbed excitation energy, whereas in PSII the stoichiometry of LHC antenna proteins per reaction center is reduced directly.In eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms, photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII) comprise a core complex hosting cofactors involved in electron transport and an outer antenna system made of light-harvesting complexes (LHCs): Lhcas for PSI and Lhcbs for PSII. The core complexes bind chlorophyll a (Chl a) and β-carotene, whereas the outer antenna system, in addition to Chl a, binds chlorophyll b (Chl b) and xanthophylls. Despite their overall similarity, PSI and PSII differ in the rate at which they trap excitation energy at the reaction center (RC), with PSI being faster than PSII (1–9). They also differ in their structure (10–12). PSI is monomeric and carries its antenna moiety on only one side as a half-moon–shaped structure whose size is not modulated by growth conditions (13, 14). PSII, on the other hand, is found mainly as a dimeric core surrounded by an inner layer of antenna proteins (Lhcb4–6) and an outer layer of heterotrimeric LHCII complexes (Lhcb 1–3) whose stoichiometry varies depending on the growth conditions (7, 12, 13, 15). Acclimation to high irradiance leads to a lower number of trimers per PSII RC accompanied by loss of the monomeric Lhcb6. These slow acclimative responses regulate the excitation pressure on the PSII RC, preventing saturation of the electron transport chain (16) and the oxidative stress in high light (HL), leading to photoinhibition. The response to rapid changes in light level is managed by turning on some photoprotective mechanisms, such as the nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) of the excess energy absorbed by PSII (16), which is activated by the acidification of the thylakoid lumen and protonation of the trigger protein PsbS or LhcSR. Low luminal pH also activates violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE), catalyzing the de-epoxidation of the xanthophyll violaxanthin to zeaxanthin (17, 18), a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by excess light (9, 13). Zeaxanthin also enhances NPQ, as observed in vivo by a decrease of PSII fluorescence (19). The short-term effects of exposure to HL on PSI have been disregarded thus far. Because of its rapid photochemistry, PSI shows low fluorescence emission, implying a low ¹Chl* concentration and a low probability that chlorophyll triplet states will be formed by intersystem crossing. This characteristic suggests that the formation of oxygen singlet excited states (¹O*₂) is reduced and that NPQ phenomena in photoprotection are less relevant in PSI (20, 21). Nevertheless, several reports have shown that, especially in the cold (22–29), PSI can exhibit photo-inhibition, with its Lhca proteins being the primary target (24, 30). Upon synthesis in HL, zeaxanthin binding could be traced to two different types of binding site. One, designated “V1,” is located in the periphery of LHCII trimers (31–33). The second, designated “L2,” has an inner location in the dimeric Lhca1–4 and the monomeric Lhcb4–6 members of the LHC family (34–37). Experimental determination of the efficiency of the violaxanthin-to-zeaxanthin exchange yielded a maximal score in the Lhca3 and Lhca4 subunits (24, 25). Interestingly, Lhca1/4 and Lhca2/3 are bound to the PSI core as dimers that can be isolated in fractions identified as “LHCI-730” and “LHCI-680,” respectively, both accumulating zeaxanthin to a de-epoxidation index of ∼0.2 (20, 38). Lhca3 and Lhca4 carry low-absorption-energy chlorophyll forms known as “red forms” (39, 40) that are responsible for the red-shifted PSI emission peak at 730–740 nm at 77 K. The molecular basis for red forms is an excitonic interaction of two chromophores: chlorophylls 603 and 609 located a few angstroms from the xanthophyll in site L2, which can be either violaxanthin or zeaxanthin depending on light conditions (41, 42). It is unclear whether the binding of zeaxanthin to the PSI–LHCI complex has specific physiological function(s) or is simply a result of its common origin with Lhcb proteins.The goal of this study was to understand whether zeaxanthin plays a role in PSI–LHCI photoprotection. To investigate the role of zeaxanthin bound to Lhca proteins, we analyzed the changes in antenna size and Chl a fluorescence dynamics in PSI supercomplexes binding either violaxanthin or zeaxanthin. We found a zeaxanthin-dependent regulation of PSI antenna size and an enhanced resistance to excess light upon zeaxanthin binding. These results show that dynamic changes in the efficiency of light use and in photoprotection capacity are not exclusive to PSII, as previously thought; instead, eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms modulate the function of both photosystems in a coordinated manner.     

Distinct roles of the photosystem II protein PsbS and zeaxanthin in the regulation of light harvesting in plants revealed by fluorescence lifetime snapshots

The photosystem II (PSII) protein PsbS and the enzyme violaxanthin deepoxidase (VDE) are known to influence the dynamics of energy-dependent quenching (qE), the component of nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) that allows plants to respond to fast fluctuations in light intensity. Although the absence of PsbS and VDE has been shown to change the amount of quenching, there have not been any measurements that can detect whether the presence of these proteins alters the type of quenching that occurs. The chlorophyll fluorescence lifetime probes the excited-state chlorophyll relaxation dynamics and can be used to determine the amount of quenching as well as whether two different genotypes with the same amount of NPQ have similar dynamics of excited-state chlorophyll relaxation. We measured the fluorescence lifetimes on whole leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana throughout the induction and relaxation of NPQ for wild type and the qE mutants, npq4, which lacks PsbS; npq1, which lacks VDE and cannot convert violaxanthin to zeaxanthin; and npq1 npq4, which lacks both VDE and PsbS. These measurements show that although PsbS changes the amount of quenching and the rate at which quenching turns on, it does not affect the relaxation dynamics of excited chlorophyll during quenching. In addition, the data suggest that PsbS responds not only to ΔpH but also to the Δψ across the thylakoid membrane. In contrast, the presence of VDE, which is necessary for the accumulation of zeaxanthin, affects the excited-state chlorophyll relaxation dynamics.Plants regulate light harvesting by photosystem II (PSII) in response to changes in light intensity. One way that plants are able to regulate light harvesting is through turning on and off mechanisms that dissipate excess energy. This energy dissipation is assessed via nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence. Energy-dependent quenching (qE) is the NPQ process with the fastest kinetics. It turns on and off in seconds to minutes, allowing plants to respond to rapid fluctuations in light intensity, which is thought to reduce photodamage (1, 2).Illumination causes the formation of gradients of electrical potential (Δψ) and of proton concentration (ΔpH) across the thylakoid membrane. Although it has been suggested that Δψ may play a role in qE (3), only ΔpH is thought to trigger different proteins and enzymes to induce qE (4). The major known factors involved in induction of qE are the enzyme violaxanthin deepoxidase (VDE) (5) and the PSII protein PsbS (6). The mutant npq1, which lacks VDE and cannot convert violaxanthin to zeaxanthin, has a phenotype with lower qE compared with the wild type (7). Transient absorption measurements suggest that zeaxanthin may quench excited chlorophyll (8). The npq4 mutant, which lacks PsbS, shows no rapidly reversible quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence, suggesting that PsbS is required for qE in vivo (6). PsbS is pH sensitive (9) but is not thought to bind pigments, and thus is likely not the site of quenching (10). It has therefore been hypothesized that PsbS plays an indirect role in quenching, perhaps facilitating a rearrangement of proteins within the grana (11–13). In this paper, we examine the fluorescence lifetime of chlorophyll throughout the induction and relaxation of quenching in intact leaves with and without PsbS and zeaxanthin to examine whether PsbS and zeaxanthin change the type of quenching that occurs in plants.The amount and dynamics of qE are generally measured by changes in the chlorophyll fluorescence yield. One limitation of the chlorophyll fluorescence yield is that it can only inform on the amount of quenching, not on excited-state chlorophyll relaxation dynamics, which reflect how chlorophyll is quenched. Despite this issue, the amount of quenching is commonly used as a proxy for the type of quenching by separating components of quenching based on kinetics, mutants, and the effects of chemical inhibitors. By artificially increasing ΔpH in isolated chloroplasts from npq4, Johnson and Ruban (14, 15) have been able to increase the amount of quenching in npq4 plants to levels observed in wild type plants, suggesting that PsbS may catalyze qE. One potential complication with these studies is that the use of the chemical mediators of cyclic electron transport often necessitates studying isolated chloroplasts rather than intact leaves. In addition, the observation of equivalent amounts of quenching still does not prove that the type of quenching in npq4 is the same as in wild type.In contrast with fluorescence yield measurements, fluorescence lifetime measurements can be used to determine whether the relaxation dynamics of excited chlorophyll are modified by different mutations, informing on the role of a protein or molecule during quenching. The relaxation dynamics of excited chlorophyll during NPQ depends on many variables, including the distance to a quencher, the interactions between the orbitals of chlorophyll and the quencher, and the number of quenchers (16). The shape of the fluorescence lifetime decay curve can be used to determine whether two samples have similar excited chlorophyll relaxation dynamics. Our results show that, although the presence of PsbS does not alter excited chlorophyll relaxation dynamics, the absence of VDE does. These measurements are performed in intact leaves without any chemical treatments, and the data strongly suggest that PsbS plays a catalytic role in vivo.     

Loss of Miro1-directed mitochondrial movement results in a novel murine model for neuron disease

Defective mitochondrial distribution in neurons is proposed to cause ATP depletion and calcium-buffering deficiencies that compromise cell function. However, it is unclear whether aberrant mitochondrial motility and distribution alone are sufficient to cause neurological disease. Calcium-binding mitochondrial Rho (Miro) GTPases attach mitochondria to motor proteins for anterograde and retrograde transport in neurons. Using two new KO mouse models, we demonstrate that Miro1 is essential for development of cranial motor nuclei required for respiratory control and maintenance of upper motor neurons required for ambulation. Neuron-specific loss of Miro1 causes depletion of mitochondria from corticospinal tract axons and progressive neurological deficits mirroring human upper motor neuron disease. Although Miro1-deficient neurons exhibit defects in retrograde axonal mitochondrial transport, mitochondrial respiratory function continues. Moreover, Miro1 is not essential for calcium-mediated inhibition of mitochondrial movement or mitochondrial calcium buffering. Our findings indicate that defects in mitochondrial motility and distribution are sufficient to cause neurological disease.Motor neuron diseases (MNDs), including ALS and spastic paraplegia (SP), are characterized by the progressive, length-dependent degeneration of motor neurons, leading to muscle atrophy, paralysis, and, in some cases, premature death. There are both inherited and sporadic forms of MNDs, which can affect upper motor neurons, lower motor neurons, or both. Although the molecular and cellular causes of most MNDs are unknown, many are associated with defects in axonal transport of cellular components required for neuron function and maintenance (1–6).A subset of MNDs is associated with impaired mitochondrial respiration and mitochondrial distribution. This observation has led to the hypothesis that neurodegeneration results from defects in mitochondrial motility and distribution, which, in turn, cause subcellular ATP depletion and interfere with mitochondrial calcium ([Ca²⁺]_m) buffering at sites of high synaptic activity (reviewed in ref. 7). It is not known, however, whether mitochondrial motility defects are a primary cause or a secondary consequence of MND progression. In addition, it has been difficult to isolate the primary effect of mitochondrial motility defects in MNDs because most mutations that impair mitochondrial motility in neurons also affect transport of other organelles and vesicles (1, 8–11).In mammals, the movement of neuronal mitochondria between the cell body and the synapse is controlled by adaptors called trafficking kinesin proteins (Trak1 and Trak2) and molecular motors (kinesin heavy chain and dynein), which transport the organelle in the anterograde or retrograde direction along axonal microtubule tracks (7, 12–24). Mitochondrial Rho (Miro) GTPase proteins are critical for transport because they are the only known surface receptors that attach mitochondria to these adaptors and motors (12–15, 18, 25, 26). Miro proteins are tail-anchored in the outer mitochondrial membrane with two GTPase domains and two predicted calcium-binding embryonic fibroblast (EF) hand motifs facing the cytoplasm (12, 13, 25, 27, 28). A recent Miro structure revealed two additional EF hands that were not predicted from the primary sequence (29). Studies in cultured cells suggest that Miro proteins also function as calcium sensors (via their EF hands) to regulate kinesin-mediated mitochondrial “stopping” in axons (15, 16, 26). Miro-mediated movement appears to be inhibited when cytoplasmic calcium is elevated in active synapses, effectively recruiting mitochondria to regions where calcium buffering and energy are needed. Despite this progress, the physiological relevance of these findings has not yet been tested in a mammalian animal model. In addition, mammals ubiquitously express two Miro orthologs, Miro1 and Miro2, which are 60% identical (12, 13). However, the individual roles of Miro1 and Miro2 in neuronal development, maintenance, and survival have no been evaluated.We describe two new mouse models that establish the importance of Miro1-mediated mitochondrial motility and distribution in mammalian neuronal function and maintenance. We show that Miro1 is essential for development/maintenance of specific cranial neurons, function of postmitotic motor neurons, and retrograde mitochondrial motility in axons. Loss of Miro1-directed retrograde mitochondrial transport is sufficient to cause MND phenotypes in mice without abrogating mitochondrial respiratory function. Furthermore, Miro1 is not essential for calcium-mediated inhibition of mitochondrial movement or [Ca²⁺]_m buffering. These findings have an impact on current models for Miro1 function and introduce a specific and rapidly progressing mouse model for MND.