Novel azapeptide inhibitors of cathepsins B and K. Structural background to increased specificity for cathepsin B

Abstract: We have designed and synthesized a new series of azapeptides which act as potential inhibitors of cathepsin B and/or cathepsin K. Their structures are based upon the inhibitory sites of natural cysteine protease inhibitors, cystatins. For the synthesized azapeptides, the equilibrium constants for dissociation of inhibitor–enzyme complex, K_i, were determined. Comparison of these values indicated that all of the azainhibitors act much stronger toward cathepsin B. Z‐Arg‐Leu‐His‐Agly‐Ile‐Val‐OMe ( 7 ) proved to be approximately 500 times more potent for cathepsin B than for cathepsin K. To be able to explain the obtained experimental values we used the molecular dynamics procedures to analyze the interactions between cathepsin B and compound 7 . We also determined the structure of the most potent and selective cathepsin B azainhibitor by means of NMR studies and theoretical calculations. In this report, we describe SAR studies of azapeptide inhibitors indicating the influence of the conformational flexibility of the examined compounds on inhibition of cathepsins B and K.     

Prostate Risk Index (PRIX) as a New Method of Risk Classification for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is (1) to develop a new method of risk classification for clinically localized prostate cancer; (2) to examine it in terms of compatibility with existing data such as nomograms; and (3) to compare it with existing risk-grouping methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The new grading system introduced here consists of three factors. The first is a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 4.1-10.0 ng/ml (score 0), 10.1-20.0 ng/ml (score 1), and >20.0 ng/ml (score 2). The second is a Gleason score (GS) of 6 (score 0), 7 (score 1), and 8-10 (score 2). The third is T classifications (UICC 2002) of T1c-T2a (score 0), T2b-T2c (score 1), and T3a (score 2). The sum of the three scores was named Prostate Risk Index (PRIX). Then, the compatibility of PRIX with the Partin Table, Kattan Nomogram, and Roach's formula was examined. At the same time, PRIX was compared with D'Amico, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and Seattle classifications. RESULTS: PRIX 0 corresponded to 1-2% of pathologic lymph node involvement (pLN+) according to the Partin Table; PRIX 1 to 3-4%; PRIX 2 to 7-10%; PRIX 3 to 14-18%; PRIX 4 to 24-29%; PRIX 5 to 32-37%; and PRIX 6 to 42%. PRIX well separated the risks with relatively narrow ranges of probability, while D'Amico, NCCN, and Seattle classifications generally gave wide ranges especially for high-risk groups, both in the Partin Table and Kattan Nomogram. Roach's formula sometimes overestimated the risk compared to the Partin Table. CONCLUSION: PRIX fully corresponded to the Partin Table in terms of pLN+, and corresponded to the other nomograms better than any existing risk-grouping method. PRIX may thus function as a prognostic factor or contribute to patient selection in clinically localized prostate cancer.     

Alice in Wonderland syndrome as a presenting symptom of EBV infection

Four Chinese patients (2 boys, 2 girls), ages 4–9 years, who had episodes of perception error of body schema and objects are reported. The metamorphopsia, which had been named Alice in Wonderland syndrome, is the major presentation. All of them were proved to have acute Epstein-Barr virus infection, as documented by positive heterophil antibody test and/or positive IgM antibody to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen. The duration of the perception disorder ranged from 1 week to 3 months. We believe that any young child presenting with Alice in Wonderland syndrome should undergo examination for Epstein-Barr virus infection; complete recovery from the disorder can be expected.