The provision of a time-critical elective surgical service during the COVID-19 Crisis: a UK experience

IntroductionWith the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, all elective surgery was temporarily suspended in the UK, allowing for diversion of resource to manage the anticipated surge of critically unwell patients. Continuing to deliver time-critical surgical care is important to avoid excess morbidity and mortality from pathologies unrelated to COVID-19. We describe the implementation and short-term surgical outcomes from a system to deliver time-critical elective surgical care to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.Materials and methodsA protocol for the prioritisation and safe delivery of time-critical surgery at a COVID-19 ‘clean’ site was implemented at the Nuffield Health Exeter Hospital, an independent sector hospital in the southwest of England. Outcomes to 30 days postoperatively were recorded, including unplanned admissions after daycase surgery, readmissions and complications, as well as the incidence of perioperative COVID-19 infection in patients and staff.ResultsA total of 128 surgical procedures were performed during a 31-day period by a range of specialties including breast, plastics, urology, gynaecology, vascular and cardiology. There was one unplanned admission and and two readmissions. Six complications were identified, and all were Clavien-Dindo grade 1 or 2. All 128 patients had preoperative COVID-19 swabs, one of which was positive and the patient had their surgery delayed. Ten patients were tested for COVID-19 postoperatively, with none testing positive.ConclusionThis study has demonstrated the implementation of a safe system for delivery of time-critical elective surgical care at a COVID-19 clean site. Other healthcare providers may benefit from implementation of similar methodology as hospitals plan to restart elective surgery.     

Qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings to establish the components of a skilled low-cavity non-rotational vacuum delivery

Objectives  The objectives of this study were to define the components of a skilled low-cavity non-rotational vacuum delivery (occiput anterior, vertex at station +2 or below and less than 45-degree rotation from midline) and to facilitate the transfer of skills from expert to trainee obstetricians.
Design  Qualitative study using interviews and video recordings.
Setting  Two university teaching hospitals (St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, and Ninewell's Hospital, Dundee).
Participants  Ten obstetricians and eight midwives identified as experts in conducting or supporting operative vaginal deliveries.
Methods  Semi-structured interviews were carried out using routine clinical scenarios. The experts were also video recorded conducting low-cavity vacuum deliveries in a simulation setting. The interviews and video recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic coding. The anonymised data were independently coded by three researchers and compared for consistency of interpretation. The experts reviewed the coded interviews and video data for respondent validation and clarification. The themes that emerged following the final coding were used to formulate a list of skills.
Main outcome measures  Key technical skills of a low-cavity non-rotational delivery.
Results  The final list included detailed technical skills required for conducting a low-cavity vacuum delivery. The combination of semi-structured interviews and simulation videos allowed the formulation of a comprehensive skills tool for future evaluation.
Conclusion  This explicitly defined skills list could aid trainees understanding of the technique of low-cavity vacuum delivery. This is an important first step in evaluating clinical competence in intrapartum procedures.     

Obesity Diagnosis and Care Practices in the Veterans Health Administration

BACKGROUND  

In response to dramatic increases in obesity prevalence, clinical guidelines urge health care providers to prevent and treat obesity more aggressively.     

妊娠糖尿病妇女使用门冬胰岛素或常规人胰岛素在疗效、安全性方面的比较

在一项随机、平行分组的开放试验中，27例妊娠糖尿病妇女（年龄30．7±6．3岁，HbA1c〈7％）随机分为门冬胰岛素治疗组（餐前5分钟注射）和常规人胰岛素治疗组（餐前30分钟注射）。试验时间为从诊断妊娠糖尿病（18～28周）至产后6周。研究期间两组的总体血糖水平均控制良好（试验开始和结束时HbA1c≤6％）。进餐试验时，试验6周时的平均血糖水平（门冬胰岛素组4．2±0．57mmol／L，常规人胰岛素组4．8±0．86mmol／L）略低于试验0周时（门冬胰岛素组4．9±0．59mmol／L，常规人胰岛素组5．1±0．36mmol／L）。