Common genetic variants do not associate with CAD in familial hypercholesterolemia

In recent years, multiple loci dispersed on the genome have been shown to be associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated whether these common genetic variants also hold value for CAD prediction in a large cohort of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We genotyped a total of 41 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 1701 FH patients, of whom 482 patients (28.3%) had at least one coronary event during an average follow up of 66 years. The association of each SNP with event-free survival time was calculated with a Cox proportional hazard model. In the cardiovascular disease risk factor adjusted analysis, the most significant SNP was rs1122608:G>T in the SMARCA4 gene near the LDL-receptor (LDLR) gene, with a hazard ratio for CAD risk of 0.74 (95% CI 0.49–0.99; P-value 0.021). However, none of the SNPs reached the Bonferroni threshold. Of all the known CAD loci analyzed, the SMARCA4 locus near the LDLR had the strongest negative association with CAD in this high-risk FH cohort. The effect is contrary to what was expected. None of the other loci showed association with CAD.     

Clinical approaches to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)ranges from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH),leading to fibrosis and potentially cirrhosis,and it is one of the most common causes of liver disease worldwide.NAFLD is associated with other medical conditions such as metabolic syndrome,obesity,cardiovascular disease and diabetes.NASH can only be diagnosed through liver biopsy,but noninvasive techniques have been developed to identify patients who are most likely to have NASH or fibrosis,reducing the need for liver biopsy and risk to patients.Disease progression varies between individuals and is linked to a number of risk factors.Mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis are associated with diet and lifestyle,influx of free fatty acids to the liver from adipose tissue due to insulin resistance,hepatic oxidative stress,cytokines production,reduced very low-density lipoprotein secretion and intestinal microbiome.Weight loss through improved diet and increased physical activity has been the cornerstone therapy of NAFLD.Recent therapies such as pioglitazone and vitamin E have been shown to be beneficial.Omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and statins may offer additional benefits.Bariatric surgery should be considered in morbidly obese patients.More research is needed to assess the impact of these treatments on a long-term basis.The objective of this article is to briefly review the diagnosis,management and treatment of this disease in order to aid clinicians in managing these patients.     

Comparing human and mouse salivary glands: A practice guide for salivary researchers

Mice are a widely utilized in vivo model for translational salivary gland research but must be used with caution. Specifically, mouse salivary glands are similar in many ways to human salivary glands (i.e., in terms of their anatomy, histology, and physiology) and are both readily available and relatively easy and affordable to maintain. However, there are some significant differences between the two organisms, and by extension, the salivary glands derived from them must be taken into account for translational studies. The current review details pertinent similarities and differences between human and mouse salivary glands and offers practical guidelines for using both for research purposes.     

Relationship Between Neurological Injury and Patterns of Upright Mobility in Children With Spinal Cord Injury

Background:

The predictors and patterns of upright mobility in children with a spinal cord injury (SCI) are poorly understood.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to develop a classification system that measures children’s ability to integrate ambulation into activities of daily living (ADLs) and to examine upright mobility patterns as a function of their score and classification on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) exam.

Methods:

This is a cross-sectional, multicenter study that used a convenience sample of subjects who were participating in a larger study on the reliability of the ISNCSCI. A total of 183 patients between 5 and 21 years old were included in this study. Patients were asked if they had participated in upright mobility in the last month and, if so, in what environment and with what type of bracing. Patients were then categorized into 4 groups: primary ambulators (PrimA), unplanned ambulators (UnPA), planned ambulators (PlanA), and nonambulators.

Results:

Multivariate analyses found that only lower extremity strength predicted being a PrimA, whereas being an UnPA was predicted by both lower extremity strength and lack of preservation of S45 pinprick sensation. PlanA was only associated with upper extremity strength.

Conclusions:

This study introduced a classification system based on the ability of children with SCI to integrate upright mobility into their ADLs. Similar to adults, lower extremity strength was a strong predictor of independent mobility (PrimA and UnPA). Lack of pinprick predicted unplanned ambulation, but not being a PrimA. Finally, upper extremity strength was a predictor for planned ambulation.Key words: ambulation, ISNCSCI, pediatrics, spinal cord injuryAfter a spinal cord injury (SCI), learning to walk often becomes the focus of rehabilitation for children and their families.^1,2 Although the majority of children with SCI do not return to full-time functional ambulation, those who accomplish some level of walking report positive outcomes such as feeling “normal” again, being eye-to-eye with peers, and having easier social interactions.³ Although not frequently reported by patients, there is some evidence of physiological benefits as well.^3–9 Regardless of age, upright mobility has been positively associated with community participation and life satisfaction.^10–12 For children, upright mobility allows them to explore their physical environment, which facilitates independence and learning as part of the typical developmental process.^13,14With the use of standers, walkers, and other assistive devices, as well as a variety of lower extremity orthoses, it is a reasonable expectation that some children with spinal injuries achieve upright stance and mobility.^7,9,13–21 However, there are 2 main challenges for clinicians and patients: understanding the factors that either encourage or discourage upright activities, and identifying how best to determine whether upright mobility is successful and meaningful. The literature on adults suggests that upright mobility is dependent on physiological and psychosocial factors. Physiological factors include the patient’s current age, neurological level, muscle strength, and comorbidities.^14,22–27 Psychosocial factors include satisfaction with the appearance of the gait pattern, cosmesis, social support for donning/doffing braces, and assistance with transfer and during ambulation.^{3,9,19,28–32}The identification of outcome measures that provide a meaningful indication of successful upright mobility has been difficult. The World Health Organization (WHO) describes 2 constructs for considering outcomes – capacity and performance.³³ Capacity refers to maximal capability in a laboratory setting. An example of a capacity measure is the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI), which is an ordinal scale used to quantify walking capacity based on assistive device, type of orthosis, and amount of assistance required.^34,35 Other capacity measures include the Timed Up and Go test and the 6-minute walk test.^36,37 On the other hand, performance refers to actual activity during a patient’s daily activities in typical, real-life environments.³³ For example, the FIM is an observation scale that scores the patient’s typical daily performance.^36,38–40 The FIM is considered a burden of care measure that determines the amount of actual assistance provided to a patient during typical routines and environments, which may or may not reflect maximal ability or capacity. Performance measures provide an adequate clinical snap-shot of a patients’ daily function (evaluates what they do), whereas capacity measures are better research tools, as they are able to detect subtle changes in ambulation (evaluates what they can do).In children, no capacity outcome measures of ambulation have been tested for validity or reliability. Availability of reliable and valid performance measures is also lacking. The WeeFIM is a performance measure for children, but it is not SCI specific. It is scored on the child’s burden of care, that is, on the maximal assistance required rather than the child’s maximal independence or the highest capacity of performance during a typical day. For children, another commonly used scale is the Hoffer Scale, which relies on the physician’s or therapist’s subjective determination of the purpose of the upright mobility activities (for function or for exercise).^41,42 Because parents and school systems are encouraged to integrate “exercise” ambulation into daily activities, it may not be possible to distinguish between therapeutic and functional ambulation in the home, school, or community environments. In the schools, a teacher/therapist should incorporate upright mobility into the classroom setting by donning a child’s braces and then having her/him ambulate a short distance to stand at an easel in art class or to stand upright when talking to friends during recess. In this situation, walking serves the dual purpose of being functional and therapeutic.For this study, it was decided not to rely on a subjective determination of therapeutic versus functional ambulation as the main outcome measure. Instead, we were interested in the children and adolescents who have successfully integrated independent mobility into their daily activities, regardless of frequency, distance, or purpose. Recent literature in studies of children and adolescents suggests that spontaneity is important for participation in functional and social activities. For example, a survey of patients using functional electrical stimulation for hand function found a reduction in the dependence on others for donning splints, which facilitated independence with activities of daily living (ADLs) in adolescents.^43–45 In a more recent study, Mulcahey et al⁴⁶ found that a reduction of spontaneity in adolescents was a barrier for social activity; during cognitive interviews, children reported not participating in sleepovers due to planning their bowel/bladder programs.To date, there are no measures that integrate spontaneity of standing and/or upright mobility into the daily activities of children. Toward that aim, this study introduces a new scale that attempts to categorize children into 4 mutually exclusive groups: primary ambulators, unplanned ambulators, planned ambulators, and nonambulators. The purpose of this study was to examine ambulation patterns among children and adolescents with SCI as a function of neurological level, motor level, and injury severity, as defined by the motor, sensory, and anorectal examinations of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). A secondary aim of the study was to determine how performance on the ISNCSCI exam was associated with the ability of children to independently integrate ambulation into their daily routines.