Reproducibility of Two Four-Point Clinical Severity Scores for Lateral Canthal Lines (Crow''s Feet)

BACKGROUND: Several clinical scoring systems have been used to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of hyperkinetic wrinkles. So far very few have been investigated for their reproducibility. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of two clinical four-point scales for lateral canthal lines (crow's feet), at rest and at maximum smile. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on standardized photographs, a consensus atlas depicting the different severity grades [from 0 (none) to 3 (severe)] was developed. After training based on the atlas, 49 photographs at rest and 48 at maximum smile were graded by the same group of investigators on 2 consecutive days (n=9 on Day 1; n=8 on Day 2). The scores were compared for reproducibility using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Overall, reproducibility was good for both scales. Interobserver reproducibility showed an agreement of 0.6 at rest and 0.58 at maximum smile (unweighted kappa). Intraobserver reproducibility showed an agreement between 0.47 and 0.86 at rest and between 0.62 and 0.81 at maximum smile (unweighted kappa). Using weighted kappa analysis, the agreement ranged between 0.63 and 0.91 at rest and between 0.71 and 0.85 at maximum smile. CONCLUSION: The clinical scales using scores of 0 to 3 for crow's feet, both at rest and at maximum smile, show a good inter- and intraobserver reproducibility. The use of these scores in clinical trials can be recommended.     

Why culture and language matter: the clinical consequences of providing culturally and linguistically appropriate services to children in the emergency department

As the proportion of racial, ethnic, and cultural minorities in the United States continues to expand, pediatric emergency medicine providers are increasingly likely to encounter cultural and language barriers in practice. This paper reviews a conceptual framework encompassing the decision to seek emergency care, the process of providing such care, and the adherence to treatment plans and follow-up. The ways in which cultural and language barriers can negatively impact each element of this model are discussed in detail. Specific examples include provider ignorance of dangerous folk beliefs, communication barriers secondary to inappropriate interpreter use, and discriminatory assumptions regarding child abuse, pain management, and sexual activity. The practitioner is then provided with concrete recommendations to reduce these negative effects.