Industrial back belts and low back pain: Mechanisms and outcomes

The recent increased utilization of industrial back belts as personal protective equipment in the workplace has generated considerable controversy among occupational health and safety professionals in the United States. The purpose of this article is to review the literature regarding proposed mechanisms of action of these devices and studies related to outcome of belt utilization in the prevention of low back pain and disability in the workplace. At the present time, neither the suspected mechanisms of action nor the efficacy of these devices in the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of work-related low back pain has been adequately demonstrated in clinical trials. As a result, generally accepted guidelines regarding the safe use of belts in the occupational setting have not been established. Based on this review it is recommended that further well-controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of these devices as personal protective equipment. During the interim, the decision to prescribe belts to employees in the workplace should be at the discretion of an adequately trained occupational health care provider. These devices should not be provided as an alternative to appropriate administrative and/or engineering controls.     

Ethical dilemmas in today's nuclear medicine and radiology practice.

Throughout history, societies have developed their own codes of ethics, including those pertaining to the practice of medicine. In the United States, physicians have adopted a set of ethics based on religious values and historical teachings. We, as physicians, have been presented several codes of ethics, including the American Medical Association Code of Ethics and the American College of Radiology Code of Ethics. Over time, we have learned to appropriately apply these codes to our daily practice. With the advent of new technologies in imaging, we may lose sight as to the transfer of these principles to reflect current conditions. Recent history has shown a trend of new technology leading to potential misuse of this technology and further leading to stricter governmental regulations. It is the purpose of this review to give guidelines for dealing with new technologies, such as PET imaging, and we describe a radiologist's ethical responsibility in a doctor-patient relationship. A historical review of medical ethics will lead to discussions about various issues affecting radiologists and nuclear physicians. To be sure, not all ethical situations are black and white, and therefore there are many gray areas. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are based on extension of already established rules of ethical conduct.     

Phosphorylation of neurofilament proteins and chromatolysis following transection of rat sciatic nerve

States of phosphorylation of neurofilament proteins were examined in the perikarya of rat sensory and motor neurons between 3 and 28 d following either a distal transection [6-7 cm from the L4-L5 dorsal root ganglia (DRG)] or a proximal transection (1-2 cm from the L4-L5 DRG) of the sciatic nerve. Paraffin sections of the right (experimental) and left (control) L4 and L5 DRG from animals with unilateral transection of the right distal sciatic nerve were stained immunocytochemically with monoclonal antibodies to phosphorylation-dependent (NF-P), dephosphorylation-dependent (NF-dP), or phosphorylation-independent (NF-ind) epitopes on the largest (NF200), mid-sized (NF150), or smallest (NF68) neurofilament protein subunits. Increased immunoreactivity to NF-P on NF200 and NF150 was detected in experimental DRC at 10 d, peaking by 20 d, and declining to near control levels by 28 d. Conversely, immunoreactivity to NF-dP declined in experimental DRG beginning at 6 d, reaching a maximum decline at 10-16 d, and returning to near control levels by 28 d. Immunocytochemical changes were confirmed with biochemical studies on tissue homogenates that demonstrated an increase of immunoreactivity to NF-P and a decrease of reactivity to NF-dP in the experimental DRG. Changes in immunoreactivities to NF-P and NF-dP were observed only in the perikarya of large neurons and were closely associated with chromatolytic changes in these neurons. Marked enhancement of chromatolysis, as well as the immunoreactivities to NF-P and NF-dP, occurred following a proximal (left side) versus distal (right side) transection in the same animal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Technical Note: A comparison of a novel direct ophthalmoscope, the OptyseTM, to conventional direct ophthalmoscopes

Despite the current popularity of binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, direct ophthalmoscopes are still commonly used by clinicians for fundus examination. They are considered to be expensive, however, and it has been suggested that this cost can prevent their use by healthcare professionals in developing countries. The Optyse Lens Free Ophthalmoscope is a novel direct ophthalmoscope, without a lens focus system, that allows for comparatively inexpensive manufacture and supply. We compared the clarity of view with the Optyse to that with standard direct ophthalmoscopes, over a sequential cohort of patients with a variety of refractive errors and ocular conditions. The grade of clarity of view with the Optyse Lens Free Ophthalmoscope was less than conventional ophthalmoscopes (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.0001). This grade of clarity of view was not associated with the ametropia of the ophthalmoscopic observation (Spearman r < or = 0.03, p > or = 0.28) but was with the presence of cataracts (chi2 test, p < 0.0001) with both the Optyse and the conventional ophthalmoscopes. Despite its limitations, the retinal view with Optyse was often within acceptable clinical limits suggesting that this relatively inexpensive ophthalmoscope may have a place when cost prohibits any other type of ophthalmoscope use.     

Histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi's disease)

Histiocytic necrotizing lymphadenitis (Kikuchi's disease) is a benign disorder predominantly of young women who present with cervical adenopathy. It has, on occasion, been misdiagnosed as a malignant neoplasm. Little mention of this condition has appeared in the otolaryngologic literature. A patient with Kikuchi's disease is reported and the pertinent literature is reviewed. Because both the clinical and pathological aspects of Kikuchi's disease are important in establishing the diagnosis, effective consultation between the head and neck surgeon and the pathologist is crucial.