The Relationship of Plasma Glucose and HbA1c Levels among Emergency Department Patients with No Prior History of Diabetes Mellitus

Objectives: Patients without a history of diabetes mellitus may be incidentally found to be hyperglycemic in the emergency department (ED). If the hyperglycemia is due to undiagnosed diabetes, then an opportunity for detection exists. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) provides a weighted average of blood glucose levels over the past several months; high HbA1c levels could indicate diabetes. The objective of this study was to determine whether hyperglycemia in ED patients without a history of diabetes was associated with higher HbA1c levels.
Methods: This was a prospective nonconsecutive case series of adults aged 18 years or older presenting to the ED with acute illness for whom a plasma glucose sample was drawn for clinical management. A history of diabetes/hyperglycemia or current symptoms of diabetes excluded patients. HbA1c levels were analyzed for a glucose cutoff of 110 mg/dL; the data were further analyzed using additional glucose cutoffs. Based on the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey outpatient screening data, an HbA1c level ≥6.2% was considered elevated (sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 97% for identifying diabetes).
Results: There were 541 patients enrolled; the glucose level correlated with the HbA1c level ( r = 0.60, p < 0.001). Among the 331 patients with a glucose level ≥110 mg/dL, 22.4% had an elevated HbA1c level; among the 210 patients with a glucose level < 110 mg/dL, 7.6% had an elevated HbA1c level. There were few patients ( n = 13) with a glucose level ≥200 mg/dL, but most (85%) had an elevated HbA1c level. Among the 140 patients with a mildly elevated glucose level (110–125 mg/dL), 16.4% had an elevated HbA1c level.
Conclusions: Elevated HbA1c levels are found in ED patients with elevated random plasma glucose values. ED patients with hyperglycemia may warrant referral for diabetes testing.     

The internal consistency and intra-rater reliability of an assessment practice grid for community nurses

The development of instruments to measure clinical competence in nursing shows little evidence of a systematic approach and studies of reliability and validity are absent. The present study was carried out using data on practice assessment collected in the course of a post-registration nursing programme. The data were analysed for internal consistency and intra-rater reliability. The instrument used to assess practice in the present study is highly internally consistent and there is evidence to support intra-rater reliability. However, further development and testing of the instrument is required.     

HYPERVENTILATION AND DIZZINESS: CASE REPORTS AND MANAGEMENT

SUMMARY Dizziness is a common symptom in patients presenting to an otorhinolaryngologist. Hyperventilation accounts for up to 5% of cases with dizziness and is a contributory factor in a further 20% of cases. Six cases of dizziness due to hyperventilation are presented to illustrate the authors' simple management policy. A high index of suspicion in the absence of an organic cause of dizziness and a simple provocation test will identify these cases. Management is aimed at demonstrating resting hypocapnia, investigations to exclude organic causes of hyperventilation and rehabilitation in collaboration with a clinical psychologist ensures the appropriate treatment for the dizziness and can avoid the development of chronic somatisation behaviours.     

Survey of carer satisfaction with the quality of care delivered to in-patients suffering from dementia

Quality assurance in British National Health Service provision stresses the importance of taking account of the consumer's viewpoint Elderly patients with dementia are not always able to contribute usefully to satisfaction surveys Therefore, their carers' views were sought in order to assess the quality of services offered to this client group Forty-one carers of patients discharged from the eight wards for the elderly mentally ill in Leicestershire, England, were randomly selected Individual focused interviews were conducted in carers' own homes Both quantitative and qualitative data were obtained by use of a questionnaire designed to tap the patients'/carers' experiences from preadmission, through hospital stay to post-discharge Interviewees were asked to describe their favourable/unfavourable impressions of, and reactions to, all aspects of hospital care These interviews were tape-recorded Analysis of the data included quantitative measurements of scale ratings Grounded theory was used to analyse qualitative data A wealth of information was uncovered using this research technique Much that was positive about the service was elicited However, carers highlighted areas where they felt the quality of care could be improved within all the foci discussed Twenty-two recommendations for quality improvements in service provision were made in the report as a result of this survey     

Is Consent “Informed” When Patients Receive Care from Medical Trainees?

Objectives: Medical care requires consent and consent requires information. Prior studies have shown that patients are poorly informed about the medical training hierarchy. The authors assessed the impact of “informed” on “consent,” by assessing willingness to be seen by trainees before and after information about trainee’s credentials. Methods: A convenience sample of patients in an urban emergency department (ED) waiting room was surveyed, ascertaining willingness to be seen before and after information about trainees credentials, using Likert scales. McNemar’s test, linear regression, and mixed models were used to assess statistical significance of information in changing preferences and patient characteristics predicting knowledge, willingness, and change in willingness to be seen with more information. Results: The authors approached 397 patients, and 199 (50%) English speakers participated. Initially, 45% of subjects knew the meaning of “medical student,” and 35%“intern” and “resident.” In a controlled multivariate linear regression, educational attainment (p < 0.0001) predicted more knowledge, Hispanic ethnicity predicted less (p = 0.03). Subjects were less willing to be seen by lower‐ranking trainees (p < 0.001). Information about trainees caused a significant increase in unwillingness to be seen by medical students (17% to 28%, p = 0.004) and interns (8% to 13%, p = 0.029). Conclusions: Substantial numbers of ED patients would prefer not to be seen by trainees. When patients are informed about trainees’ credentials, they become less willing to be seen by more junior trainees. Further research should clarify informed consent for care among non–English speakers and should address these issues in other medical settings.     

Brief Motivational Intervention to Increase Self-reported Safety Belt Use among Emergency Department Patients

Objectives:  Brief motivational interventions have shown promise in reducing harmful behaviors. The authors tested an intervention to increase safety belt use (SBU) among emergency department (ED) patients.
Methods:  From February 2006 to May 2006, the authors conducted a randomized trial of adult ED patients at a teaching hospital in Boston. ED patients were systematically sampled for self-reported SBU. Those with SBU other than "always" were asked to participate. At baseline, participants answered a 9-item series of situational SBU questions, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale. SBU was defined as a continuous variable (9-item average) and as a dichotomous variable (response of "always" across all items). Participants were randomized to an intervention or a control group. The intervention group received a 5- to 7-minute intervention, adapted from classic motivational interviewing techniques, by a trained interventionist. Participants completed a 3-month follow-up phone survey to determine changes from baseline SBU. Continuous and dichotomous SBU were analyzed via analysis of covariance and chi-square testing.
Results:  Of 432 eligible patients, 292 enrolled (mean age 35 years, standard deviation [SD] ±11 years; 61% male). At baseline, the intervention and control groups had similar mean (±SD) SBU scores (2.8 [±1.1] vs. 2.6 [±1.1], p = 0.31) and SBU prevalence (each 0%). At 3 months, 81% completed follow-up. The intervention group had significantly greater improvement in mean (±SD) SBU scores than controls (0.76 [±0.91] vs. 0.34 [±0.88], p < 0.001). Also, SBU prevalence of "always" was higher for the intervention group than controls (14.4% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.03).
Conclusions:  Participants receiving a brief motivational intervention reported higher SBU at follow-up compared to controls. An ED-based intervention may be useful to increase SBU.     

Clinical evaluation of continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring: Accuracy and tracking capabilities

A continuous, noninvasive device for blood pressure measurement using pulse transit time has been recently introduced. We compared blood pressure measurements determined using this device with simultaneous invasive blood pressure measurements in 35 patients undergoing general endotracheal anesthesia. Data were analyzed for accuracy and tracking ability of the noninvasive technique, and for frequency of unavailable pressure measurements by each method. A total of 25, 133 measurements of systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) by each method were collected for comparison from 35 patients. Accuracy was expressed by reporting mean bias (invasive pressure minus noninvasive pressure) and limits of agreement between the two measurements. After correction for the offset found when measuring invasive and oscillometric methods of arterial pressure measurement, the mean biases for systolic, diastolic, and mean pressures by the pulse wave method were ?0.37 mm Hg, ?0.01 mm Hg, and ?0.05 mm Hg, respectively (p<0.001). The limits of agreement were: ?29.0 to 28.2 mm Hg, ?14.9 to 14.8 mm Hg, and ?19.1 to 19.0 mm Hg, respectively (95% confidence intervals). When blood pressure measured invasively changed over time by more than 10 mm Hg, the noninvasive technique accurately tracked the direction of change 67% of the time. During the entire study, 3.2% of the invasive measurements were unavailable and 12.9% of the noninvasive measurements were unavailable. The continuous noninvasive monitoring technique is not of sufficient accuracy to replace direct invasive measurement of arterial blood pressure, owing to relatively wide limits of agreement between the two methods. The continuous noninvasive method may serve as an intermediate technology between intermittent noninvasive and continuous invasive measurement of blood pressure if tracking capabilities can be improved; but, further refinement is needed before it can be recommended for routine intraoperative use.