Nationales Reanimationsregister

Within the scope of the symposium “Rescue Medicine in Germany” (held at the Reisensburg near Ulm in 2002), the need for a standardized data acquisition set for prehospital cardiac arrest patients was identified. Therefore, the working group “Emergency Medicine” of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) created a nationwide data acquisition system for primary medical care in prehospital cardiac arrest patients treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation procedures. The system is in full accordance with the “Utstein style.” Integration of this data acquisition system, for example into the “Dortmund protocol,” is providing a standardized data web base of all acquired prehospital data analyze and to compare processing and structural quality. As additional modules for this nationwide data web base system, an inhospital module “further clinical treatment” and a “long-term follow-up” module are currently in the developmental process.     

Computerised and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty

Abstract The objective of the study was to evaluate the precision, concordance, practicability and the early clinical outcome of the use of a computerised navigation system in a comparative study with a group of 100 patients. Two groups of 50 patients each underwent implantation of a bicondylar knee prosthesis either by means of the freehand navigation system or by means of technical instrumentation. We found that the computerised navigation system provided a higher precision than the technically instrumented implantation: 94% of the prostheses implanted with the navigation system have an alignment within a range of -3° to 3° on of the Mikulicz line. Only 46% of the patients operated by means of the technical instrumentation reached this aspired result. Furthermore, the navigation system showed smaller ranges in the deviation of the aspired alignment. The radiological and computer-modeled alignment values differed both pre- and postoperatively, but to a larger extent before surgery. The varus or valgus deviations of the axis were more distinct radiologically under the weight of the patient’s body than in the computer model. The clinical outcome examined by the use of the HSS score after a mean followup of 7 months is good in both groups, and without significant differences. On average, the duration of surgery was 13 minutes longer in the computerised navigation group. We conclude that the benefit of the computerised navigation system is represented by the high improvement of precision. Achieving early clinical results identical to those in the technical instrumentation group, we expect a reduction of aseptic loosening in the computerised navigation group.