Time on previous renal replacement therapy is associated with worse outcomes of COVID-19 in a regional cohort of kidney transplant and dialysis patients

Chronic renal replacement therapy by either a kidney transplant (KTX) or hemodialysis (HD) predisposes patients to an increased risk for adverse outcomes of COVID-19. However, details on this interaction remain incomplete. To provide further characterization, we undertook a retrospective observational cohort analysis of the majority of the hemodialysis and renal transplant population affected by the first regional outbreak of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Germany. In a region of 250,000 inhabitants we identified a total of 21 cases with SARS-CoV-2 among 100 KTX and 260 HD patients, that is, 7 KTX with COVID-19, 14 HD with COVID-19, and 3 HD with asymptomatic carrier status. As a first observation, KTX recipients exhibited trends for a higher mortality (43 vs 18%) and a higher proportion of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (57 vs 27%) when compared to their HD counterparts. As a novel finding, development of ARDS was significantly associated with the time spent on previous renal replacement therapy (RRT), defined as the composite of dialysis time and time on the transplant (non-ARDS 4.3 vs ARDS 10.6 years, P = .016). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an OR of 1.7 per year of RRT. The association remained robust when analysis was confined to KTX patients (5.1 vs 13.2 years, P = .002) or when correlating the time spent on a renal transplant alone (P = .038). Similarly, longer RRT correlated with death vs survival (P = .0002). In conclusion our data suggest renal replacement vintage as a novel risk factor for COVID-19-associated ARDS and death. The findings should be validated by larger cohorts.     

Acute Nicotine Administration Increases BOLD fMRI Signal in Brain Regions Involved in Reward Signaling and Compulsive Drug Intake in Rats

Background:

Acute nicotine administration potentiates brain reward function and enhances motor and cognitive function. These studies investigated which brain areas are being activated by a wide range of doses of nicotine, and if this is diminished by pretreatment with the nonselective nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine.

Methods:

Drug-induced changes in brain activity were assessed by measuring changes in the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal using an 11.1-Tesla magnetic resonance scanner. In the first experiment, nicotine naïve rats were mildly anesthetized and the effect of nicotine (0.03–0.6mg/kg) on the BOLD signal was investigated for 10min. In the second experiment, the effect of mecamylamine on nicotine-induced brain activity was investigated.

Results:

A high dose of nicotine increased the BOLD signal in brain areas implicated in reward signaling, such as the nucleus accumbens shell and the prelimbic area. Nicotine also induced a dose-dependent increase in the BOLD signal in the striato-thalamo-orbitofrontal circuit, which plays a role in compulsive drug intake, and in the insular cortex, which contributes to nicotine craving and relapse. In addition, nicotine induced a large increase in the BOLD signal in motor and somatosensory cortices. Mecamylamine alone did not affect the BOLD signal in most brain areas, but induced a negative BOLD response in cortical areas, including insular, motor, and somatosensory cortices. Pretreatment with mecamylamine completely blocked the nicotine-induced increase in the BOLD signal.

Conclusions:

These studies demonstrate that acute nicotine administration activates brain areas that play a role in reward signaling, compulsive behavior, and motor and cognitive function.     

Predictors of Abnormal Functional Luminal Impedance Planimetry Findings in Non-mechanical Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction

Digestive Diseases and Sciences - Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a common but nonspecific motility pattern identified by esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM)....     

A Case of Benign Hepatic Cyst with Supra-elevated Cyst Fluid Tumor Markers

Digestive Diseases and Sciences -     

Difficulty in distinguishing malignant gastric lymphoma from advanced gastric cancer: Focusing on endoscopic findings of the Borrmann type

Malignant gastric lymphoma (MGL) accounts for a small proportion (upto 5%) of gastric malignancies. However, unlike for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that requires surgical treatment, the standard treatments for MGL are chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Hence, the initial impression of the endoscopist is critical for the differential diagnosis and for planning future treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the endoscopic diagnostic accuracy and the possibility of distinguishing between AGC and MGL depending on the endoscopist''s experience.A total of 48 patients who had MGL, and 48 age and sex-matched patients who had AGC were assessed by endoscopic review at a tertiary referral hospital between June 2008 and February 2017. Two endoscopic specialists reviewed the endoscopic findings and divided these diagnoses into 5 groups: Borrmann type (1, 2, 3, and 4) and early gastric cancer-like type. After this, 7 experts and 8 trainees were asked to complete a quiz that was comprised of 6 images for each of the 96 cases and to provide an endoscopic diagnosis for each case. The test results were analyzed to assess the diagnostic accuracy according to the pathologic results, endoscopic subgroups, and endoscopists’ experience. For inter-observer agreement was calculated with Fleiss kappa values.The overall diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic findings by the experts was 0.604 and that by the trainees was 0.493 (P = .050). There was no significant difference in the diagnosis according to the final pathology (lymphoma cases, 0.518 vs 0.440, P = .378; AGC cases, 0.690 vs 0.547, P = .089, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, the experts showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for the endoscopic Borrmann type 4 subgroup, including lymphoma or AGC cases, than the trainees (P = .001). Inter-observer agreement of final diagnosis (Fleiss kappa, 0.174) and endoscopic classification groups (Fleiss kappa, 0.123–0.271) was slightly and fair agreement.The experts tended to have a higher endoscopic diagnostic accuracy. Distinguishing MGL from AGC based on endoscopic findings is difficult, especially for the beginners. Even if the endoscopic impression is AGC, it is important to consider MGL in the differential diagnosis.     

Proximal improvement and higher-order resting state network change after multidomain cognitive training intervention in healthy older adults

GeroScience - Prior randomized control trials have shown that cognitive training interventions resulted in improved proximal task performance, improved functioning of activities of daily living,...